Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I don't like the term "special needs".

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
lightningandsnow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-20-09 11:28 AM
Original message
I don't like the term "special needs".
Edited on Fri Mar-20-09 11:30 AM by lightningandsnow
I don't know, it just sounds condescending to me. And silly - I mean, doesn't everyone have needs that may or may not be "special".

I have a learning disability, and personally, I'd much prefer the term "person with a disability" than "special needs person/child". The latter just sounds a little condescending. And what's so wrong with having a disability? Why are we so afraid to say it?

Also, people with disabilities, including intellectual disabilities are people unto themselves, with independent thoughts, feelings, and lives. Not just somebody's children.

(This has little to do with anything, by the way. The discussion of disability issues just got me thinking.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-20-09 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. someone asked my friend what he preferred to be called and his reply was "John, dumbass"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lightningandsnow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-20-09 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I like the way he thinks.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-20-09 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. And my response to that would have been...
"Nice to meet you, John Dumbass. My name is Gregg." :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-20-09 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. whoa, were you there?
he is so hillarious. The local town had fund raisers to give his family money so they could travel to his bedside at the specialty hospital. After he got better he said he felt bad because he was afraid that they'd want their money back because he didnt kick the bucket.

He also says that people make fun only because they dont get the primo parking spaces
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-20-09 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. No offense meant; that's my usual response to rudeness
While your friend no doubt gets tired of the question, I would be surprised if it was asked in a rude way or with the intent of being offensive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-20-09 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. no offense taken. he prefers to be called by his name that a weak label
and he's a HUGE smartass too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-20-09 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
4. I think the terms of preference depend on personal taste
I've heard arguments for using "differently abled" instead of "disabled"

I just don't think there's a consensus on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lost in CT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-20-09 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. Differently abled is a lie... I'm blind in one eye tht is diffrent.. it isn't
a fucking ability...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-20-09 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
6. I believe the reasoning is the semantics
"Ability" means having competence or skill. The prefix "dis-" carries a sense of "opposite," "excluded" or "lacking." Thus "disability" and "disabled" are seen as meaning -- and often are used to mean -- "lacking ability," "without skills" or "the opposite of competence."

Sure, "special needs" sounds condescending, but it doesn't carry an inherent dismissal of ability. I have mild dyslexia and my step-father has serious mobility issues; when a label is needed, we both use "differently abled" to show that we are not "averagely abled." I think that carries less of the value judgement found in both "disabled" and "special needs."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-20-09 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
9. That's an interesting take...
Signage was changed yesterday in the building where I work, and in addition to the symbol of a person in a wheelchair, the words "disabled access" were included. Seems this caused an uproar among employees in wheelchairs; they didn't want to be referred to as "disabled." They all feel very abled. They felt it should be called what it is: Wheelchair Access. There are a lot of very able people in wheelchairs, on crutches, using prosthetic limbs, using canes, etc. It doesn't automatically make them disabled, which would mean they are unable to do things. They can't use the escalator... I hate that thing anyway and avoid it at all cost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-20-09 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. I learned recently that a lot of deaf people feel that way
especially those who are deaf from birth. Many of them feel that ASL is a superior form of communication to speech anyway, and they certainly don't feel disabled by a lack of hearing. Some are quite militant about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trudyco Donating Member (975 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-20-09 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
10. I agree with you. My child has learning differences. But not everybody
uses the same term everywhere. "Special needs" I thought came from public school. Teachers use it sometimes. So I interchange sometimes.

I don't like the term "Gifted and Talented" either. I have a kid who is advanced in academics. She is no more gifted or talented than her sibling. Just different. Needs more challenges in school. Some kids are both "Gifted" and "Special Needs" otherwise known as "twice exceptional". I don't think they are exceptional. Just different.

But you have to have some sort of language to communicate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-20-09 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Both learning differences you mention require special attention
Everyone learns differently, and education is generally pointed at the mean average. Someone outside the mean, in either direction, can easily be lost in the system and can be labeled something that they are not... literally and figuratively.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-20-09 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
13. It's going to take some time to find the right language about disabilities.
The word we have now to discuss that whole field of thought and action has a negative built into it, right up front. There are two thoughts among people with disabilities: on the one hand, they want to be seen as people first and foremost--they want the disability to fade into the background, not just for them, but for everyone. On the other hand, society's discomfort with disability has meant that people with disabilities have traditionally been pushed toward invisibility. People with disabilities want to feel proud of what society has, up to now, made them feel ashamed of.

Society clearly needs years and years of pychotherapy or intensive analysis to figure out why it's so fucked up and juvenile about variations from the norm. A change of a word is not going to substitute for that. It's just a little step toward it. "Special" will not be the last word. We can only hope that some day we actually find the right one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terisan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-20-09 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
14. Yes sometimes the terms that seemed progressive when first used are not so useful
latter. Things evolve. Maybe it is time to brainstorm new word usage.

I think Senior Citizen may have outlived its usefulness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
serrano2008 Donating Member (363 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-20-09 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
16. I just like how there are so many different terms and there are people who don't like all of them.
"Special Needs" "Mentally Challenged" "Retarded" "Mentally Disabled" "Mentally Handicapped"

Is this not the perfect topic to point out that you just can't please everybody, so some people (everyone else) are gonna have to get over it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC