Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Feinstein, Who Co-Sponsored EFCA In 2007, May Not Support It This Time

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ArchieStone1 Donating Member (137 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 10:26 AM
Original message
Feinstein, Who Co-Sponsored EFCA In 2007, May Not Support It This Time
Source: Greg Sargent's blog

By Greg Sargent
Plum Line
March 27, 2009

Uh oh — this could potentially represent ather big setback for supporters of the Employee Free Choice Act. Senator Dianne Feinstein , who co-sponsored the measure in 2007, is now saying she isn’t sure whether she can back it this time around.

Feinstein spokesperson Gil Duran confirms to me that Feinstein hasn’t signed on as a co-sponsor to the current bill yet. He sends over this statement from the Senator suggesting that she’s leaning against backing it this time, at least in its current form:

“I have thought for some time that the way to approach this issue is by trying to see if there can’t be a compromise between the business community, the agriculture community and labor. This is an extraordinarily difficult economy and feelings are very strong on both sides of the issue. I would hope there is some way to find common ground that would be agreeable to both business and labor.”

Read more: http://theplumline.whorunsgov.com/labor/feinstein-who-backed-efca-in-2007-may-not-support-it-this-time



With friends like these...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
1. no wonder corporatists can be so arrogant
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
2. Fuck you, you corrupt, corporatist trash!!!
I'll bet those bribes were tasty. Yeah. Suck that corporate dick, you fucking whore!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-27-09 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
3. "An extraordinarily difficult economy"
Translation: I can't count on a presidential veto saving my overrich friends from having to pay their employees a little closer to what they're worth.

Courtesy of your friendly neighborhood gratuitous
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 05:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC