Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clinton lies under oath about sex. Gonzales lies under oath

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 05:00 PM
Original message
Poll question: Clinton lies under oath about sex. Gonzales lies under oath
Edited on Thu Mar-29-07 05:06 PM by cali
about official DoJ business in a Congressional Hearing. Clinton gets impeached and has his licence to practice suspended for several years.

What happens to Gonzo?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. How jaded am I that I would be surprised if he even would be let go from his job?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. No more jaded than I am.
I realized after I posted it that I forgot the option of staying on- and though I think that's unlikely- it isn't outside the realm of possibility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
3. Has a single subpoena been issued to any White House staff yet?
I remember how breathless everyone has been about that prospect. Maybe I missed it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. They will be.
Leahy, Conyers and Shumer have been setting their ducks in a row and strengthening the power of those subpoenas. And today's hearing did just that. Kyle directly implicated Harriet Myers, making the case for her testimony that much stronger. Leahy and others know that the subpoenas will be contested through the legal process. The negotiation they've been engaged in and Hearings like today's make their case for the need to subpoena that much stronger.

Don't expect subpoenas before the third week in April.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. (yawn) Wake me when it happens. Maybe tell me how many Friedman Units we have to wait.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
5. Wait a couple of months then, "I'm sorry to see Alberto go.." Rummy redux.
With the usual jabber about "faithful service to his country" and "..will be missed".

Then, yesterdays news - as revised by the RW to "for the good of the country" and "not to serve as a distraction", blecchh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
7. Please read the transcripts before you say "Clinton lies under oath about sex". n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Amen. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. It doesn't really matter.
First of all, that's the overwhelming perception in the country, and second of all, I remember those smarmy interviews where he tried to parse everything six ways from Sunday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
10. Pres. Clinton WAS NOT CONVICTED of lying under oath. This is an opinion backed
Edited on Thu Mar-29-07 06:39 PM by WinkyDink
by no legally binding evidence. And none of us was there, so why take Monica's word?

And "smarmy interviews" don't equate to "under oath".

As for "public perception": WMD's, Iraq, Saddam, and 9/11, anyone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. And I didn't say that HE WAS CONVICTED
I said he was impeached. Want to argue that for crap's sake? And what's more he goddamn well did lie, and fucking apologized for it. I certainly was against impeachment, but he behaved like a real asshole, and I blame HIM for bush, as much as I blame crooked pukes and Nader. He also completely abused the power imbalance when it came to an young intern in the WH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. You said he lied under oath..he did not nor was he ever charged with such a thing
He lost his license for misleading testimony but not for lying. He told the exact truth as to the definition of sex that was given him. He lied to the general public when he wagged his finger and said he did not have sex with that lady. America considers a blow job sex even if the special prosecuters office does not..You carry the right's water on this subject..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egalitariat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. He did it. Who cares? It wasn't important.
We look as dumb and hypocritical when we say "Lying under oath wasn't a big deal. It was just a blow job!" as the Republicans do when they say "Lying under oath wasn't a big deal. It was just a ......"

If we applied the same hypocrisy standards to ourselves as we do to the Republicans, this would be a really boring place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Right. People DIE when Republicans lie.
Or else the very fabric of justice and rule of law perishes.

When Democrats lie, a couple of people have a good time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egalitariat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. I couldn't agree more with your statement.
I was responding to the poster who has convinced himself that Clinton didn't lie under oath. That kind of intellectual dishonesty isn't necessary for us to dominate this argument. So why do it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
11. Bush lies about WMD'S and bombs the sh*t out of 100's of thousands!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC