Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Oops Stanford has no money for a lawyer!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 04:13 PM
Original message
Oops Stanford has no money for a lawyer!
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29989167/
<snip>
Texas billionaire R. Allen Stanford, accused by the Securities and Exchange Commission of a massive Ponzi scheme, has denied wrongdoing and asked a federal judge to free up some of his money so he can hire a lawyer.

Houston attorney Dick DeGuerin, who has talked with Stanford about representing him, told the newspaper that Stanford needed to get some response on the record in the SEC case, even if it was only a general denial.

“This is a massive case with lots of facts,” DeGuerin said. “When the injunction was signed he wasn’t present and didn’t have notice that the lawyer who made an appearance (for him) was going to withdraw.”

DeGuerin said there is a precedent for legal fees to be set aside.

“It’s simply wrong to take everything from someone and say: ’Now, defend yourself,’“’ he said.

Stanford blamed court-appointed receiver Ralph Janvey for not being able to hire an attorney because he said Janvey was responsible for the assets and money being seized. He asked that future filings involving him be sent to J.D. “Bucky” Allshouse, a Houston divorce lawyer who is representing him in his divorce.
-------------
From 'are you enjoying life as a billionaire' to 'can't pay a lawyer'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cosmik debris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. DeGuerin is Tom DeLay's lawyer FWIW n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Stanford and Delay are good buddies
Birds of a feather and all that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. When the government seizes 100% of assets this is what happens
Maybe the government should allow a person accused that isnt convicted to keep 2% to 10% of assets so they can defend themselves against prosecution?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I'm sure there are enough victims who can't pay for a lawyer
to sue Stanford.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cosmik debris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. I think he should rely on a Public Defender.
If that's justice for the poor people, it's justice for the rich people too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Innocent until proven guilty
I know its easy to hate, but those words are supposed to mean something.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikeytherat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
5. "If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be provided."
mikey_the_rat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Gideon v. Wainwright
I think a court-appointed attorney is totally called for here. After all, people go on trial for their lives with court-appointed counsel, and district attorneys and judges all over the country don't bat an eye about it. Stanford's only at risk for his liberty and allegedly ill-gotten wealth; seems a public defender should be adequate representation for that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikeytherat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Exactly. And thank goodness for Mr. Stanford that PDs are not overworked, underpaid, and stressed.
Pleasant dreams, Mr. Stanford.

mikey_the_rat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
8. Does he still have a house and a car?
Try craigslist pal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phred42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
10. Good! Let him use a SOCIALISTIC Public Defender
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC