Obama Meets the Queen Mother!

[BeFree]

On edit: changed title and some words.

Here we are talking about the "Power Behind the Throne" and the "Borg", and what do we see Obama doing? Kissing the Queens ass.

Didn't America throw off royalty? Didn't we beat the King of England and claimed that Kings and Queens are no better than any one else? So what is Obama doing over there kissing up to royalty?

Obama had to go to Europe and meet the Kings and Queens. Don't get me wrong. He doesn't want to, he HAS to. They told him to get his ass over there ASAP.

Anyway, back here at home, on the dem Underground, we are once again talking about the "Powers That Be".

Good to see some reality and deep politics being discussed on these pages.

[BeFree]

1. Geithner

Know why Geithner is the Sec of Treas? He was put there by the PTB. They told Obama Geithner was their man.

[ConcernedCanuk]

2. I wonder how many homeless could have been fed and sheltered for the cost of this trip

.
.
.

We have the internets and teleconferencing now

Transporting tons of vehicles and weaponry for a visit . .

is this really necessary?

Not to the homeless and needy it ain't. .

[BeFree]

6. They should come over here

And kiss our ass! But no, we send our President to meet the Queen. What the hell?

See, this is what Carter did, he told them to kiss his ass and he stayed home to fix America first. So the PTB made sure he was finished.

[supernova]

20. The location of the G8, now G20 meeting changes

every meeting. Sometimes it's here, sometimes it's in Europe. It was in Seattle a few years ago, remember?

But not that such practicalities matter to you. Please continue with your unfocused anger and scenery chewing.

[Beregond2]

3. Gee, you're classy.

[step up]

110. Maybe the OP doesn't want to be "classy," which, by the way,

according to my old Emily Post etiquette book, is an atrocious adjective. :rofl:

[supernova]

4. Wow, you know so little about international relations

That post is ignorance personified.

[BeFree]

8. The queen is royalty

We kicked the royalty outta here. We don't do royalty, but there he is, doing royalty. Do you realize how the royals have made slaves of millions of us? Do you?

[supernova]

11. She is the Head of State for the UK

The visit was a necessary part of the job of being President.

The Prime Minister of the UK is not the Head of State, the Queen is.

It would be very bad international manners to visit Great Britain and not visit the head of state, the Queen. She is the Head of State until the people of the UK say otherwise. Perhaps they will in the not too distant future get rid of the monarch like we did, but for now, that's the law.

And you don't have to tell me that a monarchy is not a great idea, but thanks for playing.

edit: Paying an official visit is not the same thing as supporting monarchy or even approving of it, but you do get that nuance, don't you?

[BeFree]

16. I thought I voted for Change

Not more of the same old shit that got us into this mess.

So what if Obama dissed the Queen? Would I lose my job? Any more of my freedoms? Would there be more homeless? Worse banks?

What would happen if we just told the Queen, and all that royalty crap: So sorry, you are history!! You are to be, forevermore, ignored.

Now that would be some real change, eh?

[supernova]

19. Because that is the job of the British public,

deciding whether or not to keep the monarchy, not ours. You know, self-determination for separate countries and alla dat.

The way you talk, you'd think she was still our head of state.

Dude, get a grip, it was 193 years ago.

[BeFree]

21. Hey

It isn't everyday you get to bash the mofos who have caused untold misery and grief for millions of us peons, and I'm getting it on.

Please don't tell me you're trying to protect them.

And while our running the royalty off our shores did happen so many years ago, they still make slaves of our sisters in other places. In fact, they are still our enemy. Please, cut them no slack. Be done with them. Hell, lets string 'em up. That'll show 'em who's the boss!!

[supernova]

30. So you're advocating acting like Dubya all over again.

Nice.

In case you hadn't noticed, we're trying to get people to like us, and as a consequence, take us seriously again.

[BeFree]

49. See my name here: BeFree

It means that I bow to no one. Especially a symbol of some of the worst man has done to humanity through the ages.

Bush bowed before her, I never would. Give me liberty, or give me death!

[ddeclue]

53. How about we give you an education instead?

You seem to have skipped American History entirely...

:crazy:

[BeFree]

61. Go fly a kite

And thanks for kicking this thread. It's been fun. Except for your personal attacks and your support of the royal enemies.

[ddeclue]

66. Put down the crack pipe!

:crazy:

I have NO support for the Royal Family.

I DO have support for diplomacy and having a knowledge of HISTORY and not being an ass in someone else's country however..

:crazy:

[ddeclue]

31. Umm... you need a calender it was 232+ years ago...

2009-1776=233. When July 4th comes along it will be 233.

[supernova]

35. I was counting from the war of 1812,

which was our last conflict with them.

But thanks for the math. :-)

[ddeclue]

37. OK but I don't understand the rationale for using that date...

instead of the Declaration which is the formal date of separation.

:patriot:

[supernova]

39. It was the last time we physically fought each other

I don't get why that's hard to understand.

:shrug:

:patriot:

[ddeclue]

43. Just going off your post which referred to the last time an English monarch was our head of state...

In the War of 1812, we had a President (James Madison) and our own gov't and no British monarch was our head of state.

The last time we had a British monarch as head of state was in 1776. Hence 232+ years ago not 193.

:P

[RB TexLa]

Not everyone was in America at that time, and have had to fight those pieces of shit and their

subjects after your magical date of 1812. Good for America that they felt stopping freedom was too costly here. But there are other places they still are willing to use force to prevent freedom.

[ddeclue]

52. Umm the War of 1812 was not fought over "freedom"...

Do they just not teach American History anymore in schools?

:argh:

[RB TexLa]

55. Being able to trade with who we want is not freedom? But, hey, I'm just a stupid mick, huh?

probably better off on my knees bowing to the fuckers right? Just a bunch of white monkeys aren't we?

[ddeclue]

57. Ummm no - that is TRADE.. Freedom is an individual right.

[ddeclue]

29. The Queen of England is an executive at AIG?

:crazy:

[supernova]

38. LOL!

:D

[BeFree]

42. She is a representative

Of the rich bastards that are screwing us over. And you fawn over her and protect her? Whose side are you on?

[ddeclue]

46. Umm.. NO I don't "fawn" over her... I hardly ever think about the Royal Family

and when I do it's usually because something embarassing has happened to them in the news.

I DO however believe in NOT making an ASS of myself when traveling abroad by insulting my hosts and their government.

:nuke:

Teh stupid in this thread is growing exponentially and must be stopped!

:nuke:

[BeFree]

54. So

You spend your time following me around on my thread where i am beating the crap out of the royals and instead of helping me beat on our enemies, you beat on me?

[ddeclue]

56. I beat on STUPIDD...The United Kingdom is NOT our enemy..

your stupidity is.

[BeFree]

60. Royalty is the enemy

Try to stay on the topic.

[ddeclue]

63. The topic is how stupid you are..

Royalty is NOT the "enemy" since:

1) We are NOT ruled by the British Royal family and haven't been since 1776.

2) The British Royal Family is a figurehead. They don't rule in any real way either. It's NOT up to us to tell the United Kingdom how it should conduct its affairs - do you want us to invade England and depose them? The English have a right to choose their own form of government and if they no longer want a monarchy, that's up to THEM.

:crazy:

[Bicoastal]

62. Ooooh, big man, you're doing SO much to fight our "enemies" by posting this drivel.

...I have no idea what your true motive is, but if you're really suggesting Obama should wage an all-out war on the world's monarchies because "It's all about FREEDOM, damn it!", then congrats, you've actually out-O'Reillied O'Reilly. Colbert would be proud.

[BeFree]

65. Colbert? Really?

Fantastic!!

Yes. Obama should wage war on the royals. And so should you. We all should. They are our enemies.

[Bicoastal]

67. OK--prove it. Why is Queen Elizabeth II our sworn enemy?

And I'm talking about the real world here, not the one you live in.

BTW, if this is all an elaborate April Fools Hoax, at this point you totally got me. If not, :wow:

[BeFree]

78. She is a member of the royals.

IIRC, the royals are all inbreds. From Russia, to Austria, Germany, France and England, the royals inbred with other royals, all the time raping and pillaging the serfs.

Their history is something that made America the New World for all the teeming hungry masses that yearned to be free. Free from what, you ask? Free from the royals and their raping and pillaging.

[ddeclue]

79. Ummm SOO? That was a century ago and we did a lot of the same crap

a century ago too... ask the Phillipinos, ask the Cubans... ask the Dominicans.. ask the Panamanians..ask the American Indians...

The British are entitled to whatever form of government pleases them - it's NOT your business as an American to try and force them to live under YOUR vision of government any more than it was THEIR business to tell us that 233 years ago.

If you object so much, immigrate to the U.K. and start objecting..at least THEN you'll have some right to tell them what they should do.

:crazy:

[Bicoastal]

83. BUT WHY IS *THIS* MONARCH OUR "ENEMY?"

Or are you lumping all the monarchs who ever reigned together indiscriminately? Because Ivan the Terrible was a bloodthirsty tyrant, so is Elizabeth Windsor?

How very Bushian of you.

[ddeclue]

85. Posting While Intoxicated?

[Bicoastal]

86. I'm pretty convinced at this point. And I've seen so much other CRAZY shit in this one thread...

...I'm starting to wonder if bars shut down early on April Fools Day or something.

This thread =

[ddeclue]

68. Teh STOOPID is growing ... it must be stopped!!!

:crazy:

[DemBones DemBones]

5. She's the Queen. Her late mother was the Queen Mother.

I don't think Obama has taken to meeting dead royalty.

[BeFree]

7. Like I give a shit?

Sad to see someone here pays so much attention to the royalty.

[ddeclue]

58. Umm NO it's called watching the evening news...

[spoony]

94. What is it with the Ugly American ravings on DU today?

Fucking numpty.

[DemBones DemBones]

97. Like you might prefer not to be ignorant of reality.

Or not.

[slampoet]

105. Pride in your ignorance is nothing to be agressive about.

[Posteritatis]

118. Yeah, better to remain ignorant about the rest of the world. USA! USA! USA! (nt)

[gula]

9. I don't think so, she died in 2002

Before ranting and raving you might want to check some facts.

[anigbrowl]

15. XD

Gotta love it, eh?

[catzies]

50. I came in to say that. Glad someone noticed. n/t

[NYC Liberal]

10. "claimed that Kings and Queens are no better than any one else"

Not necessarily. The Founding Fathers would have been happy to remain British subjects and indeed they wanted to. They only finally declared independence because their grievances were not being heard and power was being abused. Had the king given them even some of what they were asking for, there probably would have been no revolution. They were hesitant enough to begin with.

[BeFree]

12. Uhmmm

"All men are created equal"

Remember that hugely historic change that made America the Land of the Free?

Don't even try to rewrite American history around me, bucko.

[Nye Bevan]

26. ummm... except for all those slaves

of which 223 were owned by Jefferson.

[BeFree]

36. And women!

You left out the women?

The fact of "all men are created equal" was the revolution that finally, way too many years later, allowed women the vote and even later blacks, is what we're talking about. That there would be, eventually, no more kings for us to bow too. And we're getting there. Kissing the queens ass is a step back!

[NYC Liberal]

32. Maybe Obama should say what that pro-monarch apologist John Adams said

to King George when they met after the war ended:

"I think myself more fortunate than all my fellow Citizens in having the distinguished Honor to be the first to stand in your Majesty’s royal Presence in a diplomatic Character"

[BeFree]

40. He'd a done all us a big favor

If he had stabbed the mofo. If Adams was a federalist and a pawn of the PTB, he screwed us over.

[NYC Liberal]

44. Whatever his actions after the war, before the war

he was a huge advocate for independence.

That's not to say I agree with a lot of his politics.

[ddeclue]

41. Oh..teh stupiddd!...You might want to reread American history bucko..

The Declaration took ten years to come about and even AFTER Concord and Lexington John Adams spent a year begging the Continental Congress to act for Independence and they wouldn't. They sent letters to his majesty seeking reconciliation and it was only in May of 1776 when they started to take the idea of Independence seriously.

:eyes:

[BeFree]

45. So

You dis the idea that "all men are created equal"? If not, wtf is your point?

[ddeclue]

48. Umm.. NO I dis' the idea that you know anything about American History at all.

:crazy:

[anigbrowl]

13. The Queen =/= the Queen Mother

Unsurprisngly, the rest of your OP is equally void of fact.

[Occulus]

112. When I saw the headline on the OP

I knew it was going to be a train wreck.

Good to see my instincts are still sound :D

[Canuckistanian]

14. The Queen Mother is dead

Her real name was Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon.


She died March 30th, 2002. She was the mother of Queen Elizabeth II, who is the present reigning Queen.

And it wouldn't do you any harm to acknowledge the monarch of one of America's greatest allies.

The American Revolution was in the 1770s. Things have changed.

Get over it.

[UTUSN]

17. That's what *I* would say!1 n/t

[BeFree]

23. String 'em high!

I understand you canucks still bow before the Queen. Fine. But I am an American. I bow before no one!!

[Canuckistanian]

33. Grow up n/t

[BeFree]

18. Gawd!!

London erupts with anger over the summit and what do we Americans do? Recite the royal history. Gotta get that right. Screw the fact that the royals are our enemy, we must get their lineage corrected ASAP, at all costs!

Gawd, what have we become?

[ddeclue]

25. Grown up people who don't piss all over our hosts when we are traveling abroad?

:shrug:

You are the classic ugly American. People like you make me embarassed to travel abroad - I'm all the time having to apologize for the yahoos.

The English spent two years fighting Hitler when the U.S. simply wasn't ready and suffered much more than we did to prevail over the Nazis. Who knows what might have happened had they not held out. They have been our strongest allies in the Cold War and since and are generally very nice and decent people.

I had the privilege of spending two weeks in Cambridge last November during the Presidential election and they were by and large ecstatic that Obama was elected.

:argh:

[ddeclue]

22. Tacky flamebait, and FYI the Queen Mother is dead.

:argh:

[BeFree]

24. 'betcha

Mrs. Obama didn't bow before that symbol of all that is bad about how the elites made slaves of people for centuries.

[ddeclue]

27. Betcha you're being a jackass.

FYI: The British abolished slavery 60 years before the United States. Thanks for showing what you don't know.

:argh:

[MiniMe]

59. Of course she didn't

First of all, the protocol for meeting the Queen is that men bow and women curtsey. However, since The President and First Lady are considered leaders, it is protocol for them NOT to bow and curtsey. When Prince Phillip (the asshole) met Jackie Kennedy he told her that she shouldn't curtsey as the wife of a leader of the country. And she didn't. After the JFK funeral, Prince Phillip went to visit her and she curtsied, then said to the Prince, I am no longer the wife of a leader.

The Queen is a figurehead only now, not the leader of England. However, observing protocol when visiting another country as a representative of the US is the right thing to do.

[BeFree]

69. Protocol?

All men are created equal. No one should bow to anyone. Ever.

The royals, you might have missed it, have screwed over so many people that the royals will burn in hell, if there is a hell.

I am proud to help them along their way. That's my protocol. That is a free man's protocol.

[ddeclue]

72. OK YOU try sit down when President Obama enters a room..

:crazy:

OF Course there is ceremony and protocol in international relations. It's NOT about the individual it's about showing respect to the other country. And FYI Obama did NOT bow to Queen Elizabeth NOR did she bow to him. They treated each other as EQUALS because they are both heads of state. Your ignorance is truly astounding. It's a wonder you can feed yourself without choking and bathe without drowning.

:crazy:

[BeFree]

28. Revolution!!

We sit around and talk about how this country needs a revolution, and what do we do? Nothing. But we do sit back and smile sweetly as our last great hope goes and kisses the royal's asses.

That's not revolution, that's revoltingly disgusting. Enough!

[ddeclue]

34. Hey Moran.. John Adams, the guy who instigated "Revolution" was our first ambassador to England and

bowed before King George III as ambassador.

You are an embarassment to DU. I really can't believe this thread is still around...

:argh:

[spoony]

95. Well I'm watching the news, and I don't see your lazy arse on there

with a pitchfork, so I guess you're "sitting back" with the rest of us, annoying us with your running yap full of tough guy bullshit.

[Bicoastal]

47. You've got to be kidding me. PLEASE tell me this is an April Fool's Joke.

No one can be so ignorant of International Relations, past or present, that they would suggest purposely insulting the Queen of England, or insinuate that Obama is only in Europe because "the Kings and Queens" told him to "get his ass over there."

You're either a very sly jokester or an utterly clueless dope.

[ddeclue]

51. Ohh...teh stupidddd!!!

His shipment of FAIL has arrived...

[Adelante]

64. The Queen Mother is dead nt

[bridgit]

70. The reality is that there are more 'royals' than these ones suffering this round of myopia...

Reality is that Mohammad was a slaver. As was Abraham said to be if the term was gentily put forward as: servant, Hagar being a prime spirit in that ongoing E-volution. As did ways Europeans slaughtered one another, so was the case in the Tutsi-Hutu conflict while some oppressions visited there being somehow even more violent to the last; houses within Chinese dynasties & Illuminati sweeping across landscapes painting their temples with swine's blood, and Siddhartha was just another 'well-off' kid

"deep politics"? - imo not in this thread, I'm left with being unconvinced this thread has been designed to accommodate such options; I suppose the upside is that this thread is new & childlike and as such capable of maturation but no you are right...

She's tiny, she's old, she waves like she's forever unscrewing a light bulb and you'll have a very rough go of it getting her out of Balmoral

[Name removed]

73. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[ddeclue]

75. Umm enjoy your visit from the Secret Service and FBI...

:crazy:

:hide:

[Name removed]

81. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[ddeclue]

84. Enjoy YOUR visit from the FBI and Secret Service too...

Please just save us all the time and trouble and send DU your name home address and phone number so that they can give it to the FBI.

:eyes:

[bridgit]

76. Riiiiiight!

[Bicoastal]

74. OK, I understood not a word of this.

Seriously, what's going on? Is everyone PWI tonight or what?

[bridgit]

89. PWI? No...

My pet observation about DU is, well, I suppose our ability to deliver undeniable myopia to subjects we *demand* others be pliable enough to ignore as being myopic views on a host of issues. Here...the world is not flat, I don't need to be drunk to understand that. Neither is the world merely 3-D, or even an orb...it's an elliptical spheroid. And as the OP expressed chagrin not seeing any "deep politics" being discussed well,

My thought is that to enhance the deepness-of-it one serves a function of understanding the various facets that bear upon it and there it is done: make it deep, though ask first perhaps - how deep?

Asking as to PWI posting status here at DU should be a standing thread every so, like Mandatory Malloy, or bob's impeachment check-in threads but no not me I have to be in a dentist's chair @ 8am believe me PWI posting here at DU about a subject that lends allegory the depth of a dinner plate is the least of my problems :(

[ddeclue]

90. Pat I'd like to buy some punctuation.

These sentences are incomprehensible run on sentences.

Care to rephrase in grammatically correct diagrammable sentences?

:shrug:

[bridgit]

101. Your's is the essence of my point in fact. DU is able to call for revolution against...

the queen of England...while never being able to even move Rush Limbaugh up & off his EIB radio chair...while, again *demanding*, that others use punctuation to their satisfaction; *The Queen's punctuation mind you*, Ha! Dragging then all matters so far afield as to be even more worthless than they were to begin with welcome to DU, no, I'm not sorry...

You only think you need/want punctuation. What you need is a tiny little silk hanky from a gift shop off Piccadilly so's to wipe the porridge from the corners of your drivel.

"DOGBERRY! All thy tediousness upon me, ah?"

[Bicoastal]

93. Look, simply put, I've read the first two paragraphs of both this post and the last one..

...and I have NO FRIGGIN' CLUE what you're trying to say. I don't agree or disagree, I'm just sitting here going "huh?"

"My thought is that to enhance the deepness-of-it one serves a function of understanding the various facets that bear upon it and there it is done: make it deep, though ask first perhaps - how deep?"

I mean, that's just not a sentence. That's a string of words.

[bridgit]

102. Understood. So you are in agreement with the OP: the queen of England...

is a sticky ball of black evil that needs to be torn asunder not once but twice; and that Barack Obama is an lying, back stabbing, ass-kissing usurper of world events that may in time need be treated same-wise come on...

The gist of this OP is not about me it is about a 2-D opinion filled with half baked matters. As for the rest: we read the signs we don't read them. We exit the freeway we don't...this is not my stop have a nice day

[BeFree]

103. Eh? Not quite

The queen mother IS a sticky icky ball that represents the worst of history's transgressions against the common man, but Obama was not posed as a lying, backstabber. Obama is just a pawn of the highest order on the world stage of the monarchs and the wanna be monarchs, who just happens to be our president.

As referenced in my OP the powers that be have demanded that our man come face the PTB... he didn't want to go, he had to go.

Funny the damned knee-jerk reactions my OP inspired. No, not funny, terribly sad that so many can't comprehend anything complicated with the awful truth.

[bridgit]

106. Odd, I found little 'inspiration' in your OP but that's just me

:kick:

[BeFree]

108. You

Didn't seem to be a knee jerker, but you didn't seem to comprehend the op, indeed, you misread it, totally. Or you intentionally twisted it for your own intent. What intent that may be I don't give a shit.

[bridgit]

111. Yes, my goal is to be less knee-jerk that's true, and I did read your OP...

and, well, I think I understood could be wrong; but in doing so while having read also, "(Obama) Kissing the Queens ass" I became keyed on a larger picture and I have an i.e. for that ='ing Obama, he's there gripping & grinning we all see the pics mit der evil, tiny little shrunken queen, Michelle didn't *curtsy* which clearly falls into the 'what-the-fuck-ever' bin, but this larger pic includes for me a scourge upon global corporatism as imaged within 'the royals' whomever's royals they may be, now...

Here in America we have no such concerns in that here in America, to a considered extent; money = monarchy (which is part of why Limbaugh considers his thoughts so noble & regal), and that's the end of it or is it?

American Corporate Sports Franchises being among the elite, 'royal' American personages...then to what extent has Obama fed their designs by taking felt pen to paper picking Final-4 candidates? To the extent of consternating, however subliminal, the educational budgets of schools that can always get a team recruiter on campus, but little other funding for engineering shall we say? To Leave others with the impression there are no careers in America unless & until you've been signed by a sports franchise? Or furthering the schemes of Wall Street with his insider picks from there as has been a matter of concern here at DU as well and of late.

I say the lessons are not lost but enhanced by taking a step back and viewing not just the dot in the center that others have placed there for us; but into all four corners of the paper.

Peace on'ya, I appreciate your passion :kick:

[hyphenate]

71. I guess you didn't get the memo

that Britain and the US are allies now, not combatants. We support the nations that support us, and we treat them with the respect we want them to show us.

It appears that you would be unlikely to ever hold a position as a diplomat--your answers are tacky and without taste. The United Kingdom chooses to remain a constitution monarchy with the Queen being the head of the country, but with a parliament and a prime minister.

The United States's constitution was inspired by Britain's Magna Carta, signed by King John in 1215. And it's been a very, very long time since we had any differences with the UK that would justify being at opposing poles.

There is significant protocol between different countries around the world, and no one looks at thing quite the same way. In order for other countries to respect us, we must respect these countries in return. Through your statements, it appears you have a severe lack of understanding of how government and politicking work in the rest of the world. In some countries, such disrespect would--and could--result in your head being separated from the rest of your body. Even if we don't like how a country is governed, it is not something we can change--unless your name is George Bush or Dick Cheney, and you intend to act out any one of the fantasies that kept PNAC in power for the past 8 years.

BE the CHANGE you say you want to see. Nothing WILL change if you can't be more solicitous toward members of other governments.

[ddeclue]

77. Posting while drunk?

:shrug:



I think he fell off of this the other day and hit his head..

:crazy:

[BeFree]

80. She's a damn figurehead

And show me anywhere I mentioned the UK or Britain in the OP.

She is a member of the damned royal family. Her family is who we had a revolution FROM. Fine, we're friends now, but you think the royals forget? At first chance we'd be slaves of their's again.

IIRC, the royals are all inbreds. From Russia, to Austria, Germany, France and England, the royals inbred with other royals, all the time raping and pillaging the serfs.

Their history is something that made America the New World for all the teeming hungry masses that yearned to be free. Free from what, you ask? Free from the royals and their raping and pillaging.

[ddeclue]

82. What are you drinking man?

King George III has been dead for 200 years. You really live in your own fantasy world don't you? Have you even traveled outside your home state? You really think that the good ol' democratic (small d) USA hasn't done its fair share of raping and pillaging? You really know nothing about history, government, politics, diplomacy... it's amazing you can actually turn on your computer without hurting yourself...

[supernova]

87. I nominate this thread for a DUzy!

:rofl:

It's so funny, but probably not in the way the OP thinks.

:rofl:

[ddeclue]

88. We'd need a whole new class of awards - how about the DUNCIE?

or the DRUNKIE? or the KARAZZIE?

:crazy:

[supernova]

92. The Druggies?

That might insult addicts though.

[SidDithers]

91. The Queen Mother is dead...

asshole.

Sid

[BeFree]

104. Yes

She was an asshole. The whole idea of monarchy is loved by assholes. They are all assholes. Glad to see ya Sid. Glad to know you hate the monarchs too.

[SidDithers]

109. Ah, I see your reading comprehension is just as bad...

as your understanding of international diplomacy, and your regard for accuracy in your posts.

Glad to see you're consistently stupid, anyway.

Sid

[renate]

96. Yeah, he should have kicked her in the nuts

Meeting and being polite to a head of state who is respected by the majority of her country's citizens--WTH was he thinking?

:eyes:

[ddeclue]

98. PLEASE I BEG OF YOU DON'T POST ANYMORE TO THIS THREAD LET IT SINK!

LET IT DIE!

:(

[RB TexLa]

99. Amost forgot, kick.

:kick:

[cali]

100. Wow. A sterling (pun intended) contribution to the vast vault of DU stupidity

congrats on this moronic- supremely moronic- OP.

[LeftishBrit]

107. The Queen Mother died a few years ago (aged over 100)

So that's one royal he didn't get to meet.

[SemiCharmedQuark]

113. Yes. Why isn't Obama insulting the heads of state of every other country.

He's supposed to be the president, not some loser diplomat.

[truebrit71]

114. Possibly the most dim-witted of all of the anti-Royal posts so far...

...you are a wanker of the highest order...

The Queen Mother is DEAD you stupid, ignorant twat...

[NorthernSpy]

115. She's dead, Jim!

The QM died a few years ago. They're down to just the Q now.

[PopSixSquish]

116. Dude, There are Several DeCaffinated Brands on the Market That are Just as Tasty

Don't look at the picture of the Queen and Mrs. Obama embracing, you'll give yourself a heart attack...

[NeedleCast]

117. Possibly the dumbest thread ever posted

Lots of competition, but this is a front runner.

[SoCalDem]

119. The Queen Mother passed away years ago

The queen IS a mother, but she's not the QM :).. unless she abdicates to Charles, and lives on:)