Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Latest poll has Chris Dodd down by 16 to Rob Simmons - time for him to announce he is not running

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 08:20 AM
Original message
Latest poll has Chris Dodd down by 16 to Rob Simmons - time for him to announce he is not running
Dodd is getting swamped by three Republicans in the latest poll from the respected pollsters at Quinnipiac University. It is time for him to announce he will not seek re-election in 2010 to make room for a Democrat who has a chance.

He trails Rob Simmons by an astounding 16 points at 50% to 34%. He trails little known state senator, the ultra-conservative Sam Caliguri, by 4 points, 41% to 37%, and he trails former ambassador Tom Foley by 8 points, 43% to 35%.

In no case does Dodd get over 37%. In fact, the Q-poll says that 59% will definitely not vote for Dodd.

Against Simmons, Dodd barely gets over 50% among Democrats and Dodd’s overall approval ratings among Democrats are astonishing, only 51% approve of his performance.

from the Q-Poll:



Connecticut Sen. Christopher Dodd trails former U.S. Rep. Rob Simmons, a possible Republican challenger, 50 - 34 percent in the 2010 Senate race, according to a Quinnipiac University poll released today, as voters disapprove 58 - 33 percent of the job the Democratic incumbent is doing, his lowest approval rating ever.

Matched against two other possible Republican challengers, Sen. Dodd trails both State Sen. Sam Caligiuri 41 - 37 percent and former ambassador Tom Foley 43 - 35 percent, the independent Quinnipiac (KWIN-uh-pe-ack) University poll finds.

In the Dodd-Simmons matchup, Democrats back Dodd by only 58 - 27 percent while Simmons leads 87 - 6 percent among Republicans and 56 - 25 percent among independent voters.

The incumbent's approval is down from 49 - 44 percent March 10.

A lot more at the link:
http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x1284.xml?ReleaseID=1283&What=&strArea=;&strTime=0



Dodd took a popularity hit when he moved his family to Iowa in his quixotic bid for the presidency. The move garnered him one delegate out of the 200+ awarded in the Iowa caucus.

Then, the pseudo-scandal of his getting a favorable mortgage deal from the disgraced Countrywide mortgage company. Even though it has seemingly not panned out into anything illegal, Dodd’s hemming and hawing for months on releasing information looked really bad to Connecticut voters.

The real scandal might be the cottage in Ireland, where Dodd seemingly got a below market for his property there, but that story is still developing.

The capper however, has been the fiasco related to the AIG bonuses and Dodd’s changing answers on what happened.

It is time for Chris Dodd to announce he will not seek re-election. Make way for Dick Blumenthal, Rosa DeLauro, John Larson, Susan Bysiewicz, Joe Courtney, Chris Murphy or even Ned Lamont.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. agreed. but he won't.
no way will Dodd retire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 08:24 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Then there is a good chance we'll lose the seat
and potentially have Simmons there for 6-12 years or longer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
3. Lamont?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomm2thumbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
4. maybe someone can ask him nicely to leave

like the other 50+ senators
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
5. I agree, it's a shame it couldn't have happened to Lieberman, but Dodd is our most endangered dem in
2010 and it would be better for him to make a graceful exit and let somebody else who has a decent chance to run.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. No kidding what's up with Connecticut Dems?
Do we need to start scrutinizing the party there?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
6. Geithner and Summers cost us Dodd and possibly his Senate seat, too. Why is anyone defending them?
Edited on Thu Apr-02-09 09:08 AM by w4rma
"The capper however, has been the fiasco related to the AIG bonuses and Dodd’s changing answers on what happened."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. The media tells us that it's Dodd's fault, and
his popularity was already in decline before AIG.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
8. Dodd is a very popular Democrat so this should be a dire warning to Democrats
There is no, and I mean NO reason in Hell Republicans should stand a chance at all in any election in America. That they not only stand a chance but are way out in front should set off warning bells. Democrats are screwing up Royally. They are blowing an opportunity of a lifetime. It is the people that they are supposed to represent not HUGE (to big to fail) business's. It is like they are shoving it in our face that we don't matter one tiny bit to them. Contracts for multi million dollar bonuses from an almost bankrupt company MUST be honored but Contracts made in good faith by auto workers don't matter one bit. They can be set aside for the "good" of the HUGE Corporations. Everything and it appears EVERYTHING is geared for the good of the HUGE corporations. Health Care...Everyone MUST have insurance. That is their plan. Force every person in America to buy health insurance from private insurance companies. Insurance Companies are going to make out better than Bush*'s buddies have, while the people still struggle just to get by. I am only one person but it is becoming apparent to me my vote doesn't matter so why should I even bother? I will never ever vote for a Republican but I can just not vote..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. he was popular
but, he's dug his own grave.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
9. Dodd needs to go.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
11. Double-Edge Dagger
Dodd played both ends against the middle here and could lose big. 18 months ago he was a Presidential contender and now he's the poster child of how Wall Street and the beltway are one in the same.

Connecticut has a lot of insurance and banking business that not only made money for many of Dodd's constituents but also pumped a lot of money into state coffers...and then into his own campaign as well. It's like the auto industry throwing money at their Michigan Senators or Microsoft having a lot of influence with Washington State...it's "looking after the folks back home"...or at least Dodd thought. Then when the mess collapsed, he was torn between his business interests and those of the people and made what now appears to be a major mistake. Is it fatal? It's hard to tell...there's still a long way to go until the first votes of 2010 are cast.

Surely Dodd has to be looking at how Lieberman won his re-election and can rely on his old pal Joe, no matter how wounded he may be, to put a lot of foot soldiers to help him win both a primary and the general. The fun will be how the state GOOP reacts...if Dodd were to lose in a primary and try his own third party run, would they support him or split votes for Johnson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Joe had no foot soldiers in 2006
His support came mainly from Republicans who abandoned their candidate to vote for Lieberman, as well as some Democrats & moderates that were fooled by Lieberman's words.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. He Had The AFL-CIO
http://www.thechief-leader.com/news/2006/0714/news/012.html

Mr. Lamont has gotten enough traction that Senator Lieberman announced last week that he will begin collecting signatures in order to gain ballot access as an independent.

The move would guarantee Mr. Lieberman's presence in the general election, regardless of the Democratic primary results Aug. 8. The Senator received the endorsement of the Connecticut AFL-CIO at last month's convention, though there was considerable support for Mr. Lamont during the voice-vote.



Rove and RNC money also poured in, but it was many union Democrats who crossed over that made the difference. Dodd has as strong union ties...again, would the RNC dump Johnson and support an independent Dodd? Would the unions?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC