|
after all this, then they're too stupid to be an organization you would want to work for...but in these days of jobs being so tough to find, that's cold comfort.
With any luck, there will be an intelligent human being somewhere in this chain who will take note of the fact that you WANT to return to Seattle and that if they weren't willing to consider candidates from outside the area, it was damn stupid of them not to explicitly say so, not to mention ask applicants whether they would have relocation issues.
Here's hoping that their ONLY (frankly questionable) reason for saying they are looking only for local candidates is that they can't afford to pay for anyone to locate. Fine, then, don't pay for people to relocate--but don't REFUSE TO EVEN CONSIDER THEM! Ask them if they are willing to relocate, then inform them that the company unfortunately cannot pay their relocation expenses, and ask them if they're still seriously interested regardless. If they say yes, take their word for it! Sheesh.
I'm sure some HR people have gotten burned in the past by hiring candidates who said "Sure, I'd be willing to relocate, no I don't mind that you won't pay for it" who then said "Nah, I'm taking a job with Company X instead who I don't have to move for" or "I chose Company Y because they said they'd pay me to move." But come on, this is not a market anymore in which the prospective hire is normally in the driver's seat. The least one can do is be willing to consider all qualified candidates.
Anyway, even if the worst happens, maybe you have learned from it. You need to put your desire to move back to the Seattle area in your cover letters as a reason you are interested in the job. Not THE reason, but "a" reason--and hope a real live thinking human being reads the letter.
Take heart. I was living two states away when I got my current job, and I think one reason I got the interview was that I said right in my cover letter that I was specifically hoping to return to the area to live.
|