Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I Support Repealing The 22nd Amendment

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
mudesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 01:40 PM
Original message
I Support Repealing The 22nd Amendment
Just so Obama can be president forever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. ...
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. me too, ..now...
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rcrush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yeah what could possibly go wrong?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. LULZ.
No thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
5. Thats my favorite amendment
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
6. What about the 20 second amendment?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
7. I've always hated it, but I wouldn't repeal it for one person.
I'd repeal it because it denies Americans the right to vote for a candidate of their choice.

On the other hand, I was grateful for in 88, and then again in 2000.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donald Ian Rankin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
8. Repeals of term limits are usually a symptom of a sick society.
Edited on Fri Apr-03-09 01:50 PM by Donald Ian Rankin
I'm not 100% convinced term limits are a good thing - we don't have them here in the UK, and it doesn't seem to do too much harm - but while repealing them may well not cause the decay of a democracy, it certainly seems to correlate with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Agreed -- maybe we could limit it to "two consecutive terms" ...
That way, after the guy had been out of power for at least
4 years, he could run again ... ???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buck Laser Donating Member (566 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #9
20. I don't think so...
I think amendment 22 limits a president to a total of two terms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. term limits are a definite negative for legislators here in US
especially here in California.

The net result is that by the time they figure out how things work, they are termed out, so lobbyists have even more power because they are the only ones that know the ropes--and because the legislators know that they will have to ask the lobbyists for jobs in the near future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
10. No Thanks
I don't believe in the "President for Life" mentality, regardless of what party is in the White House.

I just think of names like Idi Amin, Papa Doc Duvalier, and Baby Duvalier.

Remember this: “And remember, where you have a concentration of power in a few hands, all too frequently men with the mentality of gangsters get control. History has proven that. All power corrupts; absolute power corrupts absolutely.”

John Dalberg-Acton, 1st Baron Acton
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
11. Term limits for the WaterCarrier Class in Congress n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. .
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
the other one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
12. I wish I could un-recommend this thread
its embarrassing to thinking people.

There might be good reasons to repeal term-limits, but idol worship isn't one of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
14. somehow, I get the feeling that if we repeal it, we'll end up with President Schwarzenegger for life
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
15. Wow, you really are in a cult aren't you? /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
16. No thanks.
Repeat after me, "Ronald Reagan's third term."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cobalt1999 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
17. No way.
We are a country of 300 million people. There are many who can do the same job or better.

Those who want the same person over and over are just into personality cults.

Fuck that. I'd like term limits on all elected offices.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aikoaiko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
18. facepalm.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-03-09 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
21. Even if there was an amendment passed, there is zero chance that the wording would allow the
incumbent POTUS to benefit.

I think we should allow more than 2 non-consecutive terms.

But the modern American presidency is too powerful, I feel a president's power could become too entrenched and powerful.


After 8 years, I think its time for some new blood.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC