Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Financial Industry Paid Millions to Obama Aide (Larry Summers, others)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
chimpymustgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 08:10 AM
Original message
Financial Industry Paid Millions to Obama Aide (Larry Summers, others)
Financial Industry Paid Millions to Obama Aide

By JEFF ZELENY
Published: April 3, 2009

WASHINGTON — Lawrence H. Summers, the top economic adviser to President Obama, earned more than $5 million last year from the hedge fund D. E. Shaw and collected $2.7 million in speaking fees from Wall Street companies that received government bailout money, the White House disclosed Friday in releasing financial information about top officials.

Mr. Summers, the director of the National Economic Council, wields important influence over Mr. Obama’s policy decisions for the troubled financial industry, including firms from which he recently received payments.

Last year, he reported making 40 paid appearances, including a $135,000 speech to the investment firm Goldman Sachs, in addition to his earnings from the hedge fund, a sector the administration is trying to regulate.

The White House released hundreds of pages of financial disclosure forms, which are required of all West Wing officials. A White House spokesman, Ben LaBolt, said the compensation was not a conflict for Mr. Summers, adding it was not surprising because he was “widely recognized as one of the country’s most distinguished economists.”

Mr. Summers’s role at the White House includes advising Mr. Obama on whether — and how — to tighten regulation of hedge funds, which engage in highly sophisticated financial trading that many analysts have said contributed to the economic collapse.

Mr. Summers, a former president of Harvard University, was Treasury secretary in the Clinton administration. He appeared before large Wall Street companies like Citigroup ($45,000), J. P. Morgan ($67,500) and the now defunct Lehman Brothers ($67,500), according to his disclosure report. He reported being paid $10,000 for a speaking date at Yale and $90,000 to address an organization of Mexican banks.

-snip-

The disclosure forms also shed further light on the compensation received by a top Obama aide who previously worked for Citigroup, one of the largest recipients of taxpayer bailout money. The aide, Michael Froman, deputy national security adviser for international economic affairs, received more than $7.4 million from the company from January 2008 to when he joined the White House this year.

-snip-

Millionaires work in a variety of positions across the administration, and they include Desirée Rogers, the White House social secretary. Ms. Rogers, a close Chicago friend of the Obama family, reported income of $2.3 million last year. She earned a salary of $1.8 million from People’s Gas & North Shore Gas, along with three other sources of income from serving on insurance company boards.

Thomas E. Donilon, the deputy national security adviser, reported earning $3.9 million as a partner at the Washington law firm O’Melveny & Myers. His disclosure form says major clients included Citigroup, Goldman Sachs and Apollo Management, a private equity firm in New York that specializes in distressed assets and corporate restructuring.

Mr. Donilon is also entitled to future pension payments from Fannie Mae, where he worked from 1999 to 2005.

Reporting was contributed by Peter Baker, David Johnston, David D. Kirkpatrick, Eric Lipton and Charlie Savage.

Selected financial disclosure forms (pdf) for top appointed administration officials, released by the White House:

* David Axelrod, senior adviser
* Melody Barnes, director, Domestic Policy Council
* Carol M. Browner, climate czar
* Cassandra Quin Butts, deputy White House counsel for domestic policy and ethics
* Gregory B. Craig, White House counsel
* Thomas E. Donilon, deputy national security adviser
* Rahm Emanuel, chief of staff
* Michael Froman, deputy national security adviser
* Jason Furman, deputy director, National Economic Council
* Valerie Jarrett, senior adviser
* James L. Jones, national security adviser
* Desirée Rogers, White House social secretary
* Lawrence E. Summers, director, National Economic Council



http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/04/us/politics/04disclose.html?_r=1&hp

******

Much more at the link. Nice work. If you can get it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
theoldman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 08:20 AM
Response to Original message
1. I suppose all of the people who worked with Bush were poor?
Only the rich get government positions. That is true even in city or state governments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chimpymustgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 08:22 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. I'm sorry you missed the point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 08:21 AM
Response to Original message
2. Someone explain to me how this is NOT a conflict of interest
because I don't see how it cannot be such a conflict.

You make millions from a group of companies, and a few months later, you're giving advice on how to fix the mess they created -- deciding how to divide the stolen taxpayer dollars -- and who are you going to think of? Much like the Goldman Sachs group, you're going to remember where you came from.

Anyway you slice it, it's a conflict of interest, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 08:34 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Obama had the opportunity to move PAST the Bush-Clinton-Bush financial elites and now he's trusting
Edited on Sat Apr-04-09 08:38 AM by blm
them to try and fix their own mess - a mess they'll 'fix' by using MORE of our money to 'fix' their cooked books first.

I supported Obama to move AWAY from the economic elites protecting their own the last 30 years. He morphed into Clinton, but, I doubt there will be an economic bubble to shield him the way Clinton had with the 90s internet/housing bubble.

I have to hope that Obama is letting them fix their messes and legacies for now and then will replace them with the progressive policies that SHOULD have been put in place in the 90s.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Where do you get people who know the financial industry that have not worked in it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. academia, for one
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. You think there were NO progressive economic policies submitted by solid analysts
Edited on Sat Apr-04-09 08:58 AM by blm
and progressive lawmakers who were dismissed and ignored by Bush-Clinton-Bush administrations?

Their warnings proved accurate - did they disappear? Aren't they available any longer?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. Of course there were, but trying to find those that did not get compensation from the
financial industry for consulting, employment, speeches, etc is pretty tough to do, expecially if we want some that is experienced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. no one is asking for ultra-pure virgins, just PROGRESSIVE POLICY from those who can be TRUSTED
Edited on Sat Apr-04-09 09:23 AM by blm
based on their past warnings and solid analysis that has been proven to be accurate.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #6
16. here, watch this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Complicated, but who should any administration pick for these jobs, Joe the Plumbers?
Any noted economist will have earned money from the financial industry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. I think you could find competent people who weren't 'players' prior
There are many competent economists out there who aren't in the F.I.R.E vertical's pocket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chimpymustgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. There are plenty of smart, competent people NOT on the take from the banksters - or among the very
architects of this financial rape of the citizenry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. Besides academia, that leaves some very slim pickings. Even people from academia
get paid to make speeches at financial companies and their related events.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #12
25. Do you believe there were NO dissenting voices in Clinton Treasury Dept offering alternative
plans with more progressive goals for the financial industry in the 90s?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. there have been many progressives policy wonks - they were always put on IGNORE by DC elite
who refused to allow them the stage to be heard.

They deserve their chance to BE right and help the rest of us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Yes, but trying to find candidates who have not worked in the industry or consulted for them
is quite difficult IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #14
19. Drop the 'never worked in' strawman and it becomes alot easier. Progressives 'consulted'
for decades and were ignored. Maybe now they should be consulted and their policies implemented for a change, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chimpymustgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #14
20. Are you saying there are no HONEST, PROGRESSIVES in the financial industry who have NOT been
on the take...and who do NOT believe in rapacious (rapist) capitalism?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. No, there are some of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chimpymustgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. There are PLENTY. We don't have to have these corrupt crooks running out ecconomy and STEALING
from us.

:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #5
23. We actually have a smart, competent guy in the administrtion.
Paul Volcker. Unfortunately, he's been marginalized and ignored throughout this crisis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. exactly the point - progressive economists ARE in DC and ignored to favor the BushClintonBush crowd
desperately needing to rescue all their legacies and the financial elite they've served for decades.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
8. oh yeah, I can count on these folks to understand the plight of the working people
NOT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TWiley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
18. so what? please explain the significance of your post
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC