Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

3 guesses: What criminal administration allowed Perchlorate in Baby Formula?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
newmac Donating Member (727 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 10:06 AM
Original message
3 guesses: What criminal administration allowed Perchlorate in Baby Formula?

The New York Times


April 3, 2009
Perchlorate found in infant formula -- CDC
By SARA GOODMAN, Greenwire

Samples of powdered infant formula contain trace levels of a rocket fuel ingredient, a federal study has found.

Researchers at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention tested infant formula for traces of perchlorate because of concerns that the chemical can damage thyroid function. Their findings were published last month in the Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology.

Perchlorate has been found in the drinking water of at least 35 states and the District of Columbia. The chemical can inhibit the thyroid gland's iodine uptake, interfering with fetal development.

The highest levels of perchlorate were found in formulas derived from cow's milk, the researchers found. They also looked at soy-based formulas, as well as formulas from lactose-free cow's milk and synthetic amino acids. They declined to say which brands they tested, but said each one contained detectable levels.

The study does not answer questions about how traces of perchlorate affect human health. Some factors could offset the chemical, including the presence of iodine. An infant's weight and formula consumption can also influence risk.

The researchers also offered several caveats for understanding the results, including the scope of the study. The samples were all taken from one city, meaning the results might not apply nationwide.

But some groups are pointing to the findings as evidence that the government needs to set a more stringent perchlorate health advisory level.

"Infants fed cow's milk-based powdered formula could be exposed to perchlorate from two sources -- tap water and formula," said Anila Jacob, a senior scientist with the Environmental Working Group. "That suggests that millions of American babies are potentially at risk."

Jacob's group is urging U.S. EPA to regulate perchlorate in water. Last year, the agency said it saw no need for such regulations because they would offer no "meaningful opportunity for health risk reduction."

But EPA in January delayed deciding on regulation until the National Academy of Sciences studies the matter.

Senate Environment and Public Works Chairwoman Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) said in a statement that the CDC study puts further pressure on EPA to set a safe drinking water standard. Boxer introduced legislation last year aimed at limiting the amount of perchlorate in drinking water and requiring some public water systems to monitor it and inform the public of any contamination.

EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson pledged at her Senate confirmation hearing that she would address perchlorate. EPA did not respond to requests today for comment.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. Hmmm...Hoover? Warren G. Harding?
K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarge43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
2. Coolidge - the business of America is business?
Reagan - government is the enemy?

GW Bush - Uncle Dick said it was ok?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
3. But some people on DU who think of themselves as experts
think breastmilk is worse for the baby. They don't know what they are talking about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glowing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. it would depend.. If jet fuel is the cause of the problem, then anyone living
near a major city would have a problem with this in their water sources... Anyone who is in a flight path of an airline would have exposure to chemical fall out. It only makes sense that it would be found in the powder mix and the female breast of a woman. I think its Bobby kennedy Jr. that has written about the high amt of chemicals in breast milk because of a mothers exposure to so many environmentally bad things such as jet fuel and mercury toxins from coal burning electric plants... the mercury exposure of children may not be coming so much from the vaccines as it is their mother who is exposed to chemicals and is toxifying her child in the womb. Most people should have a toxicology run-out with their physicals every year.. its not common to test for these things.. if it was, then their would be a huge movement to go green.. people would not like to know that their mercury content is super high and may be causing thyroid problems and may be causing weight problems, hair loss, fatigue... But it would help in understanding what supplements a person would need to help thier body adjust to the overwhelming toxins they are exposed to everyday... There is a reason we are losing the War of Cancer... We are killing ourselves for corporate greed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Huh? Isn't breast milk made for the purpose?
Designed by both God and evolution?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krabigirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. whoever said breastmilk was worse?! it's that some women are unable to
Edited on Sat Apr-04-09 12:44 PM by krabigirl
too bad donor mlk is not cheap enough or accepted in our society. until it is, it's formula or ?? (for those unable to breastfeed...and yes, they exist.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I read a post jsut the other day that said breastmilk was too contaminated
with environmental pollutants to be better than formula. Yeah, someone on DU said that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HopeFor2006 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
5. Let me guess
<<Jacob's group is urging U.S. EPA to regulate perchlorate in water. Last year, the agency said it saw no need for such regulations because they would offer no "meaningful opportunity for health risk reduction.">>

Hmmm, what administration was in place last year????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IDemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
6. 1 - Chimpy. 2 - The Deciderer. 3 - The Commander Guy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 04:12 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. 4 - Commander Kukoobananas n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC