Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Estimate of TARP's Cost to Taxpayers Increases

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 10:29 AM
Original message
Estimate of TARP's Cost to Taxpayers Increases
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123880278764488701.html#mod=rss_whats_news_us

ARIL 4, 2009
Estimate of TARP's Cost to Taxpayers Increases

By DAVID WESSEL

WASHINGTON -- The Congressional Budget Office has quietly altered its estimate of the ultimate cost to taxpayers of the $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program, now figuring the initiative will be much more expensive in the long run than it previously figured.

Some TARP outlays eventually will be returned to the government as banks return capital the Treasury has invested in them or as the government sells loans or securities it acquires as part of the financial rescue.

In January, the CBO pegged the ultimate cost to taxpayers of the $700 billion TARP at $189 billion. When the agency issued revised numbers in late March, it revised that to $356 billion, a change that drew little attention. The larger estimate reflects, among other things, the Treasury's move to use the TARP to help avoid foreclosures, as well as the changing details of its aid to American International Group Inc., and the deterioration of financial conditions and of banks in which the Treasury has invested TARP money.

The CBO estimates the program's ultimate cost using techniques similar to those generally applied to federal loans and loan guarantees, and adjusts for market risk. More precisely, it puts the net cost to taxpayers at the difference between what Treasury pays for investments or lends to firms and "the present value, adjusted for market risk of any future earnings from holding purchased assets and the proceeds from their eventual sale."

..more..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ProdigalJunkMail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. let's hope no one finds this to be a surprise
the gov't is NEVER EVER EVER right on numbers...it is like they mean nothing at all...

sP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
2. My guess: $700B, plus interest.
:think:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hendo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. How nice of them.
I sure do love how they gave money to the problem rather than correcting it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
4. ***
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FudaFuda Donating Member (425 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-05-09 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
5. I'd just like to know why the government is refusing banks trying to pay it back, w/ interest.
There was an editorial about it in yesterday's Wall St. Journal. Yeah, I know, not a popular paper around here. But it reported that the administration had apparently refused a major bank's attempt to return their TARP funds, with interest. Guess the govt. likes having its hand on the wheel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 05:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC