Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dismissal will erase Stevens verdict but not facts

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-06-09 06:27 PM
Original message
Dismissal will erase Stevens verdict but not facts
WASHINGTON (AP) — If, as expected Tuesday, a federal judge agrees to dismiss corruption charges against former Sen. Ted Stevens, it will wipe away the Alaska Republican's conviction and complete an embarrassing unraveling of the Justice Department's case.

But the dismissal will not declare Stevens innocent. Nor will it rewrite the facts of a case in which Stevens took thousands of dollars in favors and freebies from wealthy friends.

<snip>

Attorney General Eric Holder decided to dismiss the case after discovering that a key witness had made inconsistent statements and that the value of Stevens' renovations might have been far less than prosecutors contended in court. It was the final straw for a prosecution team that repeatedly mishandled witnesses and evidence.

<snip>

"He still had gifts he received," juror Colleen Walsh said Monday.

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5gZXmpL3-GlWbhbGKemFmCm_bPPmQD97D6BB83

Too bad the govt did not play by the rules....the SOB is guilty as all hell and now he is walking around shouting about how he has been vindicated!

:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tangerine LaBamba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-06-09 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. And, lest we forget,
just like Ken Lay, who croaked before he was sentenced (uh-huh, sure he did), without the sentence ever having been pronounced, Stevens can legitimately say that he was never a convicted felon.

Doesn't that suck?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-06-09 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. he can be retried, having NOT been found innocent nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-06-09 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I hope to hell they charge him again....
....but I doubt if they will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wielding Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-06-09 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Cool, that should happen. It's not double jeopardy. Is it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-06-09 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
5. The Stevens motion before the court is for a retrial.
That was the context of this news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC