|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
The Straight Story (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-09-09 06:11 PM Original message |
Taxing soda to fight obesity? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spoony (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-09-09 06:12 PM Response to Original message |
1. Hands off my Jones! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alittlelark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-09-09 06:28 PM Response to Reply #1 |
12. I'm drinking a fufu berry right now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JI7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-09-09 06:13 PM Response to Original message |
2. or they could ban soda from schools |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elleng (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-09-09 06:15 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. That too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IDFbunny (530 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-09-09 06:20 PM Response to Reply #4 |
7. Big Sugar doesn't care about diabetes or obese children |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KamaAina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-09-09 06:23 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. That'd be Big High Fructose Corn Syrup |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SeattleGirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-09-09 06:37 PM Response to Reply #8 |
21. Yep. HFCS has replaced sugar in many things. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dora (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-10-09 04:43 PM Response to Reply #7 |
83. It's Big Corn, not Big Sugar. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Quantess (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-09-09 06:25 PM Response to Reply #2 |
10. Pepsi gives way too much money to schools for soda pop to ever be banned. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nonconformist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-09-09 06:33 PM Response to Reply #2 |
15. Our school district removed the soda vending machines a couple of years ago |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Quantess (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-09-09 08:58 PM Response to Reply #15 |
29. Good point, I forgot that Pepsi also makes juice products and water. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JI7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-09-09 11:04 PM Response to Reply #29 |
39. paying for water is stupid also |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheFarseer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-10-09 07:02 AM Response to Reply #39 |
50. I've never understood bottled water either |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rcrush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-10-09 11:48 AM Response to Reply #50 |
75. Except the water that comes out of your tap is contaminated |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JeanGrey (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-10-09 09:17 PM Response to Reply #75 |
91. Why would you want to filter it out? We grew up where |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lance_Boyle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-10-09 08:25 AM Response to Reply #15 |
55. the juices are no better than the sodas in terms of HFCS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-09-09 09:30 PM Response to Reply #2 |
34. In elementary and middle schools maybe... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JI7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-09-09 11:02 PM Response to Reply #34 |
38. no they aren't, i'm sure some might be, but many aren't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-10-09 01:13 AM Response to Reply #38 |
42. High school kids are faced with much more dangerous perils than sodas |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JI7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-10-09 01:17 AM Response to Reply #42 |
43. rather we "want" them to m ake mature decisions, but most of us know that is not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-10-09 04:38 PM Response to Reply #43 |
82. They are less than 4 years away from being legal adults, some of them less than a year |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JI7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-10-09 05:21 PM Response to Reply #82 |
85. it's not about trust as much as just helping them to start off on a better track |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JerseygirlCT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-10-09 08:43 AM Response to Reply #2 |
58. Done that here. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elleng (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-09-09 06:13 PM Response to Original message |
3. Do it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Drunken Irishman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-09-09 06:15 PM Response to Original message |
5. Nanny State here we come! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KurtNYC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-10-09 10:53 AM Response to Reply #5 |
71. so legalize everything? have no social programs, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-10-09 11:44 AM Response to Reply #71 |
74. A tax on soda would be a sales tax, which is inherently regressive. It hurts poor people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KurtNYC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-10-09 12:01 PM Response to Reply #74 |
76. but poor people can't afford diabetes and heart disease either |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-10-09 12:13 PM Response to Reply #76 |
77. Well, my "nanny state" would go after HFCS,put the companies who make/use it out of business. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Thothmes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-10-09 06:46 PM Response to Reply #77 |
86. So if people drank the same amount of soda pop |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-10-09 06:54 PM Response to Reply #86 |
87. I didn't say that. Fruit water is just that, fruit in water. No added sugar. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Thothmes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-10-09 08:32 PM Response to Reply #87 |
90. So if people drank "fruit water" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-11-09 08:31 AM Response to Reply #90 |
95. Nothing wrong with plain water. I was suggesting fruit water as a compromise |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Terry in Austin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-10-09 11:12 AM Response to Reply #5 |
72. Nanny state |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
54anickel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-09-09 06:19 PM Response to Original message |
6. Wouldn't that sort of be taxation without representation - though that has no meaning any longer.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dixiegrrrrl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-09-09 07:09 PM Response to Reply #6 |
24. Actually, it was reported recently that soda comp. are returning to sugar. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ejpoeta (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-09-09 06:24 PM Response to Original message |
9. i knew that once they got away with that with cigarettes, it wouldn't be long. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Straight Story (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-09-09 06:25 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. ANYTHING that they can tie to health care they will tax - and yet we have no real healthcare |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-09-09 06:31 PM Response to Reply #11 |
13. God forbid we build parks, bike paths, par courses, disc golf courses, hiking trails, ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Straight Story (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-09-09 06:34 PM Response to Reply #13 |
17. Yeah but with these taxes you have health care...Oh wait.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-09-09 08:54 PM Response to Reply #17 |
28. My father (and uncles) were born in Byesville ... 1910-1920. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Straight Story (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-09-09 09:26 PM Response to Reply #28 |
32. We didn't discuss I think |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-09-09 09:44 PM Response to Reply #32 |
37. There just CAN'T be many people who even KNOW the name Byesville! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ejpoeta (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-10-09 05:52 AM Response to Reply #17 |
47. they use it to prop everything else up. it would be one thing if it was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ejpoeta (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-10-09 05:51 AM Response to Reply #11 |
46. not when it's THEIR stuff that is being taxed. that's the funny thing. tax the hell out of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NeedleCast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-09-09 06:32 PM Response to Original message |
14. More six taxes, super... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ourbluenation (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-09-09 06:33 PM Response to Original message |
16. so how would diet drinks fit in this scheme? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Straight Story (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-09-09 06:36 PM Response to Reply #16 |
19. They are next, your health suffers from industry making them and adding pollution |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoCalNative (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-09-09 06:40 PM Original message |
They don't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
handmade34 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-09-09 06:34 PM Response to Original message |
18. tax it! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MercutioATC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-09-09 06:36 PM Response to Original message |
20. Stop passing laws to protect me from myself!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dysfunctional press (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-09-09 09:01 PM Response to Reply #20 |
31. actually- they're trying to save society from itself... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmmmSweetOmmm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-09-09 06:40 PM Response to Original message |
22. I love living in a nanny state... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yellowdogintexas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-09-09 07:02 PM Response to Original message |
23. hey if they just brought back the original small, medium and large cups it would |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L0oniX (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-09-09 07:15 PM Response to Original message |
25. Tax high fructose corn syrup. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bryn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-10-09 09:52 AM Response to Reply #25 |
68. Good Idea! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dora (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-10-09 04:45 PM Response to Reply #25 |
84. Yes. I think so. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wickerwoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-09-09 07:23 PM Response to Original message |
26. Sounds good. Invest the money in drinkable tap water for all Americans. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Avalux (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-09-09 07:27 PM Response to Original message |
27. If I've said this once..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burning rain (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-09-09 09:00 PM Response to Original message |
30. IF you were going to use special taxes to discourage obesity...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marrah_G (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-10-09 07:35 AM Response to Reply #30 |
52. I am over wieght and havent been to a buffet in 15 years or more. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ejpoeta (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-10-09 09:24 AM Response to Reply #52 |
63. that must be why though. there can be no other possible reason than we just sit and eat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-10-09 07:02 PM Response to Reply #63 |
88. I sounds like you are having a bad time. I hope you don't get too discouraged. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Manifestor_of_Light (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-10-09 11:14 PM Response to Reply #63 |
93. A hint: Get your thyroid checked. Don't let people tell you it's all your fault. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-09-09 09:28 PM Response to Original message |
33. It is completely impossible to fight obesity. Even if there were no food anywhere..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tabbycat31 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-10-09 08:28 AM Response to Reply #33 |
57. I can think of a few ways |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
noamnety (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-10-09 09:35 PM Response to Reply #57 |
92. "end the government subsidies for HFCS" - AMEN. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flvegan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-09-09 09:30 PM Response to Original message |
35. The best way to fight obesity, realistically, is to teach nutrition and exercise. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tabbycat31 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-09-09 09:32 PM Response to Original message |
36. end subsidies for HFCS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donheld (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-09-09 11:11 PM Response to Original message |
40. Maybe many more would drink milk |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shimmergal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-09-09 11:52 PM Response to Reply #40 |
41. If they kept drinking it from |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ejpoeta (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-10-09 05:57 AM Response to Reply #41 |
48. i have drank milk since childhood, and i find myself now having problems when i drink it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marrah_G (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-10-09 07:37 AM Response to Reply #48 |
53. I became Lac Intol after age 30. I love milk and have drank it all my life. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donheld (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-11-09 12:40 AM Response to Reply #41 |
94. Pure ignorance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davidpdx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-10-09 01:35 AM Response to Original message |
44. NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-10-09 01:43 AM Response to Original message |
45. I quit drinking beer about eight weeks ago |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vinca (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-10-09 06:36 AM Response to Original message |
49. I'm for taxing everything bad for us if it will provide money for healthcare. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
taterguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-10-09 07:59 AM Response to Reply #49 |
54. Who gets to decide what's "bad" for us? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vinca (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-10-09 10:16 AM Response to Reply #54 |
69. When in doubt, tax it. If you can afford to buy the bottle of wine |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
taterguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-10-09 11:37 AM Response to Reply #69 |
73. What happens if the tax discourages enough people from buying the "bad" product |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vinca (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-10-09 01:36 PM Response to Reply #73 |
78. How about a 1% tax on everything? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChazII (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-10-09 04:11 PM Response to Reply #73 |
80. Good point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-11-09 09:26 AM Response to Reply #54 |
96. I have to laugh when I see how wine is regarded in Italy, Spain and France |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ecstatic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-10-09 08:28 AM Response to Reply #49 |
56. me too. Besides, it's unreasonable to think |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marrah_G (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-10-09 07:33 AM Response to Original message |
51. They should tax all things that are not healthy- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bighart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-10-09 09:00 AM Response to Original message |
59. If you support high taxes on tobacco than you MUST support |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
taterguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-10-09 09:10 AM Response to Reply #59 |
60. And you MUST support significantly higher gas taxes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bighart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-10-09 09:14 AM Response to Reply #60 |
61. havent't complained about them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bighart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-10-09 09:18 AM Response to Reply #60 |
62. by the way, how about you actally respond to the point I made. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
taterguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-10-09 09:35 AM Response to Reply #62 |
64. I think taxes should be for revenue, not behaviour modification |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bighart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-10-09 09:40 AM Response to Reply #64 |
65. so you don't support tobacco taxes either? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
taterguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-10-09 09:51 AM Response to Reply #65 |
67. Gas should be taxed sufficiently to cover the government expense for road building and maintenance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-10-09 09:40 AM Response to Original message |
66. I love the hypocrisy here. Tax tobacco but not pop. LOL! For those |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
-..__... (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-10-09 10:29 AM Response to Original message |
70. How about... the more you weigh, the more you pay? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-11-09 09:32 AM Response to Reply #70 |
97. I think it's perfectly reasonable for the government to determine if a substance is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chaska (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-10-09 01:43 PM Response to Original message |
79. If they tax it, put in the law that water must be free.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-10-09 04:34 PM Response to Original message |
81. I'm convinced that the only fair tax is a toilet paper tax. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-11-09 09:34 AM Response to Reply #81 |
98. That's discriminatory!! Women will be disproportionately taxed!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Reterr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Apr-10-09 07:34 PM Response to Original message |
89. Oh God this onslaught of libertarian bullshit on DU is so annoying |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed Apr 24th 2024, 03:49 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC