Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ruined by Health Care: . . *Even with Insurance We Weren't Safe*

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-10-09 07:46 AM
Original message
Ruined by Health Care: . . *Even with Insurance We Weren't Safe*
http://www.alternet.org/healthwellness/135939/ruined_by_health_care%3A_my_family_learned_that_even_with_insurance_we_weren%27t_safe_from_financial_ruin/

excerpt:
"The insurance companies cannot answer the most vexing question my husband and I -- and so many others -- ask: if "health insurance" does not pay for healthcare when people need it, then what exactly do those words mean? And all this says nothing about the fact that my husband had the foresight to purchase long-term-care coverage. The problem is that it nominally covers long-term care but does not cover its actual cost.

I am often told there is a shocking quality to our story -- it prompts a realization that if this could happen to someone like me, it could happen to anyone. But of course there is little that ought to surprise us; political connections are bound to be of little avail in the face of a problem politics has refused to address."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-10-09 08:05 AM
Response to Original message
1. This is a sad and ugly truth
When I had full coverage, my eyes were opened to the problem of being insured but being unable to make use of it. With the deductible and out-of-pocket and copays and all the rest, anything but the most basic care was prohibitively expensive, despite paying thousands of dollars per year for our "insurance."

I suspect that my experience is not unique. The number of "unaffordably insured" is probably comparable to the number uninsured, and in many ways the two are the same; if someone has insurance but can't afford to use it, that's functionally the same as having no insurance at all.

We've been fortunate in that we haven't required longterm care, but it's disgusting that insurance is allowed to persist as a for-profit enterprise at the expense of its nominal beneficiaries.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC