Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama Turns More Cautious on Climate Change,

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-10-09 10:00 PM
Original message
Obama Turns More Cautious on Climate Change,
Edited on Fri Apr-10-09 10:01 PM by G_j
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/11/us/politics/11climate.html?_r=1&partner=rss&emc=rss

Obama, Who Vowed Rapid Action on Climate Change, Turns More Cautious

By JOHN M. BRODER
Published: April 10, 2009

WASHINGTON — President Obama came to office promising swift and comprehensive action to combat global climate change, and the topic remains a surefire applause line in his speeches here and abroad.

Yet the administration has taken a cautious and rather passive role on the issue, proclaiming broad goals while remaining aloof from details of climate legislation now in Congress.

The president’s budget initially included roughly $650 billion in revenue over 10 years from a cap-and-trade emissions plan that he wants adopted. But the administration, while insisting that its health care initiative be protected, did not fight to keep cap-and-trade in the budget resolutions that Congress passed last week, and it wound up in neither the House’s version nor the Senate’s.

Overseas, American officials are telling their counterparts that they need time to gauge the American public’s appetite for an ambitious carbon reduction scheme before leading any international effort.

Has the administration scaled back its global-warming goals, at least for this year, or is it engaged in sophisticated misdirection?

Maybe some of both. While addressing climate change appears to be slipping down the president’s list of priorities for the year, he is holding in reserve a powerful club to regulate carbon dioxide emissions through executive authority.



..more..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-10-09 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. They can focus on Health Care or Climate Change - Health Care won.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-10-09 10:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. Future Grows More Hazy For Mountaintop Mining.
EPA's Fluctuating Messages Concern W.Va. Residents.

'As Washington has become more focused on climate change, coal has become something like the new tobacco: publicly reviled, at least by some, but still deeply embedded in the economy. Coal produces dirty water when it is mined and greenhouse gases when it is burned, but it also accounts for about half of U.S. electric power, and coal mining provides about 82,000 jobs.'

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/04/10/AR2009041003414.html?hpid=moreheadlines

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HillbillyBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-10-09 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. Then why did we elect him?
first retreads from previous crooked admins now is he gonna wuss out on this most important objective too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
natrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-10-09 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. the planet will burn up, but the banks got paid trillions,sems a good tradeoff
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-10-09 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
5. So "change we can believe in" means change to a climate not hospitable
...to carbon-based life? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HillbillyBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-10-09 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
6. Then why did we elect him?
first retreads from previous crooked admins now is he gonna wuss out on this most important objective too?
Cap and Trade is bullshit too. Nothing short of all of us tightening up our homes and our gluttonous greed for energy will avert serious fuel shortages and even worse climate problems..
OH and Fuck the deniers, they are just fucking deluded.
I have lived in 4 different states for periods of time long enough to see the changes for my own damn self.
Yes We have made large changes, and it was not that painful either, in fact we are saving $ and are more comfortable in our home and we are not sitting in the dark.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-10-09 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
7. I don't think he wasn't gonna get this one.
My Dem Congressman and my Dem (very liberal) Senator both said that they were NOT going to agree to the current cap and trade proposals. They said that it put Ohio at a disadvantage.

I'm not educated enough on the subject to know if they (my reps) were right that this proposal put Ohio and other traditional manufacturing States at more of a disadvantage than other States, but that did seem to be their impression.

I don't think that removing the cap and trade from the budget means that he isn't serious about Global Warming tho - there are monies in the stimulus bill for alternative energy and efficiency programs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RufusTFirefly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-10-09 11:11 PM
Response to Original message
8. Clean Coal = Healthy Cigarettes
That's what radical Leftist Al Gore said

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W4-jpOq3ytU
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-11-09 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. political logic...
and war equals peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 05:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC