Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rick Warren, Obama's first mistake.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
edhopper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 08:44 AM
Original message
Rick Warren, Obama's first mistake.
Maybe he should have listened to those of us on the left who warned that Warren was not a good choice for the Inauguration.
Not a big deal, but we were right about him.
A bigger issue is that maybe he should have listened to those same voice on Geithner and Summers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Raven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. Rick Warren is Rick Warren's mistake. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pepperbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #1
23. one does wonder why, after 5 minutes of "supporting" obama, he claims "I never supported prop 8."
a lie, yes. but does it bode well, or poorly? could it mean a real change of heart? I can't imagine any political gain from flip-flopping like that. I am still scratching my head from this one.

maybe he is getting ready to come out of the closet.

:shrug:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NeedleCast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
2. Inclusion
Seems to be what Obama is all about, even voices that he might personally or politically disagree with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zipplewrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. honoring is not inclusion
Honoring this serial liar during the second most significant inaugration in our history wasn't the way to be inclusive. It was a mistake. Just because the goals are laudible, doesn't mean the method is irrelevant. i.e. the ends don't justify the means.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
zipplewrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #7
15. Negotiating isn't honoring
Talking to someone isn't honoring them.
Working with someone isn't honoring them.
Including someone isn't honoring them.

He honored Mr. Warren, that was the mistake.

And pointing that out isn't hypocrisy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
edhopper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #7
25. If Obama treated him like a adversary
who needed to be negotiated with, that would be fine.
To elevate an anti-gay lying zealot to a place of honor was a mistake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
edhopper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #7
26. You obviously don't understand
the difference between talking with someone and bestowing an honor.
Perhaps you should just limit yourself to determining the difference between your a$$ and your elbow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LooseWilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #7
52. "fucking hypocrite"? What Psalm is that from?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NeedleCast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #5
13. You're entitled to your opinion of course
I disagree. Obama seems to have been very successful using this type of politics, which gives a voice to everyone, even people we disagree with. Isn't that what government is supposed to do? As long as Obama is at the helm, I don't mind there being some people who I may have political, personal or even ethical issues with being allowed to be heard. Because until I get elected President, there won't be a president who I agree with 100%. I have the pragmatism to be happy with Obama's leadership even if I don't agree with all of his decisions.

You want the perfect president, either run for office or understand that you're setting yourself up for failure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zipplewrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. He honored him.
Mr. Warren had no trouble "being heard". Obama can and should talk to all manner of people, and include them in all manner of processes. The mistake was honoring Mr. Warren.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zipplewrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
3. And correctable
The perfect president will never exist, and even presidents I support will make mistakes. My problem with the Warren thing was that it was easily correctible and he didn't do it. There were innumerable ways out of that mess and he didn't take any of them. We saw it again with Daschel. He didn't take any action until he was basically forced into it. This merely could be a sign of the "no drama" aspect of his style. But my concern really is that he doesn't have any counsel that will tell him that he is making a mistake. There are some counter indications, but mostly it appears to me that he can only react if he is positioned in advance to do so. If he wasn't prepared to have to change his mind, he finds it difficult to do so after the fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
4. how do you know he didn't listen?
just because he didn't do what some people wanted, doesn't mean he didn't listen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zipplewrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. You're getting semantic
In that context, "not to listen" means "not to heed the warning".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. the irony of someone trying to play the bogus "honor" card and then accusing someone
ELSE of playing semantics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zipplewrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 09:30 AM
Original message
Didn't know there was a "card" now.
What is bogus about calling it an honor? It was an honor. Warren called it an honor. You think the other speakers and performers didn't consider it an honor? The musicians called it an honor. What part about it wasn't an honor?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #8
20. It is ludricrious to argue that it wasn't an honor
When Rick Warren dies the fact he gave that prayer will almost certainly be in the first line of his obituary. The only way it wouldn't be is if he wrote it himself and purposely downplayed it. Obama will have, at most, two people give this prayer and only one will have done so first. If it isn't an honor to give the Inagural prayer at the first ever inaguration of an African American President then I don't know what the word honor means.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. nope. not semantics at all. Obama gets warnings and advice from
a great many sources. You think he should listen to you and people who are saying what you're saying. Others feel the same way about their viewpoints. Ultimately, whoever he listens to, he has to make a decision about whether that's advice/warnings/whatever, that he wants to heed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zipplewrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #12
17. Right
And if he doesn't heed advice from someone, then the expression is that he did not "listen" to them. It's not that he didn't let them talk, or that he didn't hear what they said, as you suggested, but that he did not heed them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
edhopper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #4
27. Implied within the
"he didn't listen" phrase is "he didn't do what we thought he should."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LooseWilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 12:45 AM
Response to Reply #4
51. Actually, it does mean he didn't listen.
It may not mean that he didn't hear, but it does mean he didn't listen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
9. Aw Jeez Not this shit again.
What did he do now? Is Warren in the news again and for what? Did he shoot his grandmother or something?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. The Opening Poster has accomplished their mission.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
edhopper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #10
29. And that was?
Since you are obviously a mind reader.

Signed,
the OP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #9
21. He's lied about his support of Prop 8 on Larry King.
Edited on Mon Apr-13-09 10:10 AM by progressoid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
11. Heh

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
edhopper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #11
30. I know you are taking a shot at me,
But I like the graphic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AirBaud Donating Member (107 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
14. How was selecting a pastor that essentially shares his religious view of gay marriage a mistake?
It was a decision made for personal reasons, not to send a political message.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #14
19. True--Warren and Obama are 100% in accord on the issue of marriage equality.
Warren was an appropriate, if unfortunate, choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
18. You should just make a list of the sins
of the Prez. Get a tattoo. Vote Republican.

Rehash the angst.


Or something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
edhopper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #18
31. Yeah
I should support the Prez in everything. Even if it means denying people their civil rights, or making what could be (and looks like to most progressive economist) a disastrous plan for the Banks.
Isn't saying your for us or against us and STFU something the Repugs do?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #31
35. I just LOVE what you just did.
Nice turn into the STFU meme.



You need to be more subtle, though, wait for the SECOND response from someone to claim they are doing 'what the repugs do'

A tried and true tactic that, while transparent in this case, work, mostly.

If you want to complain and whine about what the Prez is doing, fine. We get to snark your more disengenuous stances, and I would NEVER tell anyone to STFU.

Word of advice?? Just pick ONE thing per OP to criticize unless you are doing an epic, well written piece about the whole 90 days of the presidency and include well authored paragraphs of insight and links backing your stance and criticism. Examples are not difficult to find....

Anybody can wander through here and run a grocery list of shit they don't like about what the prez has done.

I just snark the lamest ones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #35
41. predictable crickets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
edhopper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #41
44. Sorry,
I went out. I have a life outside of DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #44
47. Ouch!!! Garsh, that was a good one!!!
THAT iteration, of course, of the argument-less poser, is to claim superiority because they "have a life outside DU..."

Which may mean they had to leave the basement long enough to get another mountain dew and dump the garbage like mom said.

Maybe get another bag of Skittles. Who can say???

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
edhopper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #47
48. And yet
you were so bothered by my failure to respond to your oh so witty canard, that you were compelled to give me the "ol' crickets".
Yes sir your so, so clever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LooseWilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 01:07 AM
Response to Reply #35
54. I'll take the bait.
STFU is pretty much how I read your post.

I mean, sure... you started out with the Strawman bit about tattooing an essay of potential qualms with Obama's choices, presumeably to be tattooed upon one's ass judging by the tone you took. Then you went on with the strawman leap to voting Republican (I guess you don't wanna suggest voting Nader or Green, as DU still seems to be touchy about suggesting such things)... and you wound up with a heartily dismissive "rehash the angst".

I hate to break it to you, but that's a pretty undisguised STFU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 01:57 AM
Response to Reply #54
57. Well, thanks for your concern!!
:hurts:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
22. You couldn't be more off base
Rick Warren is now waivering on opposition to gay marriage. That is hardly a mistake, unless one is not really being objective in one's assessment of President Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LooseWilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 01:15 AM
Response to Reply #22
55. I saw the clip on Matthews...
... I didn't read it so much as wavering, as just plain denial that he'd ever been involved. A point which Chris Matthews showed video to disprove.

My take is that his association with Prop 8 here in California, which I'm sure was heartfelt on his part, has made him such a target for shit flingers such as myself that, in order to better try to leverage his "honor" of speaking at the inauguration into a position of greater visibility/prominence, he is trying to sneak away from his "heartfelt" bigoted position.
Anyone who wants to take it as a sign of his wonderfully humanitarian nature is free to do so... but I personally am gonna continue to fling shit his way every chance I get until he actually starts speaking in favor of marriage equality. Trying to lie his way out of the association without any contrition work to undo what he's already done just ain't gonna make it for me. (Contrition is a Christian concept, isn't it?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
24. What did Rick do now? Apparently, you're keeping up with him
but I imagine that most people aren't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AirBaud Donating Member (107 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #24
28. Especially those of us that already have our civil rights.
We couldn't care less what he is doing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
32. Did the good pastor move to Somalia and become a pirate?



Dude.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
edhopper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #32
34. No, he went on Larry King
and lied about supporting Prop 8. Then he canceled at the last minute to go on ABC Sunday Morn to talk about it, knowing he would be called out.
Many of us thought this was not a man worthy of the honor that Obama gave him. Turns out, he was not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #34
36. Then he is self-destructing in public, like all those sanctimonious
holier-than-thou, money-grubbing grifters that use religion to skin the gullible.

Works for me. I despise Warren and all his ilk.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
33. right, not a big deal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryOldDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
37. I'm sorry, but is Rick Warren back in the news? I missed it.
He completely went off my radar when he sat down after the inaugural prayer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BoneDaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. What? You don't like resurrecting
the corpses of old beaten horses, just to beat them again.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 01:03 AM
Response to Reply #37
53. Yes, he is back in the news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
39. Austan Goolsbee came WAY before Warren. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hanse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
40. Which part was the mistake?
Obama's big tent approach to politics lead to an overwhelming victory, which included unprecedented numbers of white christian evangelicals switching parties. The republican base has crumbled. Gay marriage has triumphed in vermont and iowa. And as for listening to Summers and Geithners, the leading economic indicators are showing we've hit bottom and are turning around.

If that's your idea of a mistake, I say more power to Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreeState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #40
42. What did Obama have to do with Iowa or Vermont? Got a link? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
edhopper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #40
46. Yeah
drink that Kool Aid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hanse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #46
50. Will do.
Keep choking on that bile.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LooseWilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 01:27 AM
Response to Reply #50
56. You forgot to mention the wonders accomplished in California on Nov. 4th.
You know, Prop 8? You know... California did like Iowa did, and the State Supreme Court ruled separate marriage laws for same sex couples in contrast to different sex couples to be unconstitutional. Then some fuckin' "holy" alliance of Mormons and other assorted religious nutjobs (including... wait for it... Rick Warren) pushed a ballot initiative to change the state's constitution ... known as Prop 8, so as to overturn the decision of the state supreme court.

Sure, our state allowing that sort of thing is stupid as hell, and our Attorney General, good old Jerry Brown, actually not only refused to defend the proposition in court, he actively attacked it along with the opposition... but that doesn't change the fact of Rick Warren's complicity.

And this is the man that Obama chose to have do the prayer whatever it's called at his inauguration.

Choke on the bile? No thanks... I like to spit it at anyone who tries to defend Warren, or his ilk...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
edhopper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #56
58. Thanks Willy
Edited on Tue Apr-14-09 09:04 AM by edhopper
your posts are more on target than I could respond.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kip Humphrey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
43. Rick Warren's purpose driven life apparently doesn't preclude lying when it serves his purpose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
45. Geitner was the second.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pastiche423 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #45
49. Nope
rahm was the second and the start of Obama's corporatists administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #49
59. IMO Rahm was his first. He selected Rahm before Warren.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zipplewrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #59
60. I was uncomfortable
I wasn't crazy about him, but I'm willing to give Obama some more rope there.... for a while. Ultimately he may have to go but even that may not be proof that it was a mistake. Many/most of them don't last the full terms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pastiche423 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #59
61. You are absolutely right!
Warren din't enter the picture until right before the ignaugaration. Obama chose rahm on November 7, 2008.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
62. Oh yes, Hillary, Edwards, Kucinich all of 'em (Gore, Kerry) would not have made any mistakes
and would have listened to the left on everything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 27th 2024, 12:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC