Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kristol Uses Pirate Crisis To Argue For More Defense Spending

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
laststeamtrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 06:12 PM
Original message
Kristol Uses Pirate Crisis To Argue For More Defense Spending
Kristol Uses Pirate Crisis To Argue For More Defense Spending

Earlier this month, Defense Secretary Robert Gates announced a plan to reorient defense spending away from lucrative boondoggles for contractors and toward systems that are proven to work and are needed in present-day military situations. Conservatives immediately cried foul; Sen. Saxby Chambliss (R-GA) went so far as to claim that the Obama administration “is willing to sacrifice the lives of American military men and women for the sake of domestic programs.”

Right-wing pundit Bill Kristol was among the conservatives fearmongering about the supposed “cuts.” Following North Korea’s test launch of a missile, Kristol declared that “it is scary to have a president” talk about cutting the defense budget. “It is a very dangerous moment,” he said. Today on Bill Bennett’s radio show, Kristol said he hoped that the pirate crisis would make President Obama think twice before following through on the proposed budget reforms:

KRISTOL: Unfortunately, given the world we live in, this is not something we can skimp. And that’s another thing I hope the president realizes —

BENNETT: Budget cuts. The defense budget cuts, right?

KRISTOL: Well I hope he thinks about that. I mean, a lot of things that don’t look necessary — who needs the a big destroyer, the U.S.S. Bainbridge? Who needs Seals getting hours, weeks, months of training being snipers, isn’t that something that went out of fashion 70 years go? You can imagine people making these arguments. And it turns out, a lot of these things turn out to be important. … And I do hope it makes him sort of understand that there’s no substitute for having a strong and large military, honestly. ... http://thinkprogress.org/2009/04/13/kristol-pirates-spending/
*

Alright men, whatever it takes. Let's get this New American Century back on the road.

Bolton, Kristol & some of the more thoughtful people here at DU all agree.

We all say "fuck yeah".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Median Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. Pirate Episode Actually Supports Gates' Position, Not The Neocons
Edited on Mon Apr-13-09 06:28 PM by Median Democrat
More money should be spent on training of personnel and less on cold war gizmos. The F-22 and Star Wars was not going to save the Captain. Rather, the success of the mission depended on highly trained soldiers on the ground. Yet, the Neocons would rather spend the money on military contractors, who make huge campaign contributions, rather than on training.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. Well, the Navy has been cut severely under GWB in terms of hulls and people.
The USN had to get rid of 30,000 sailors in three years at one point.

The number of hulls is the lowest since before the First World War.

Norfolk's kind of empty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC