Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

As an officer in the Navy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
margotb822 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 08:13 PM
Original message
As an officer in the Navy
I can assure you that there are no "extra" ships to send to the HOA region and police these pirates. In case anyone has forgotten, we still have two wars going on, a North Korea that is working on an ICBM, many nations that are operating submarines with greater effectiveness, China still denying American ships access to the straits of Taiwan, and drug runners running thousands of tons of drugs and arms in the western hemisphere.

We're fucking busy here!

And it shows...two ships have run aground in less than a year, a sailor fell overboard and dies in the gulf, a sub hit a ship in the straits of Hormuz and a plane fell out of the sky on to a house killing four people. This is battle fatigue. This will only get worse if we keep stretching our forces thin.

We can't do this on our own. There is incentive for many other nations to join in policing the pirates, but we (the world) have to recognize the fact that Somalia can't continue to be an anarchic state.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. Agreed. Obama is good at networking. I feel confident that his admin
will build a coalition to address this mess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. GWB cut the USN mercilessly. Just terrible.
Edited on Mon Apr-13-09 08:17 PM by Captain Hilts
I think the ship hit the sub.

Yeah, I hang with bubbleheads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
margotb822 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. It's not even the cuts, it's the pace
People don't think about the Navy too much with the land wars, but we're out there too, and doing a lot of other things. We don't have any wonderful new ships to show for this MIC ruling of the past 8 years either. Most ships are older than me (and I'm close to 30).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. The Navy's working harder than ever. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. And he chose to embroil the Army and Marines in Iraq.
I have confidence that our troops can handle it, but they need better leadership than what the GOP left them with.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. You can't convince folks here that the Army and Marines went to Iraq kicking and screaming.
Edited on Mon Apr-13-09 08:26 PM by Captain Hilts
They don't want to be there.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #9
26. I don't think they had much of a choice.
I know that the troops can ignore an illegal order, but the GOP-controlled media had lots of people confused about who was to blamed for the attacks and where those people might be.

I know that many DUers knew better than to trust the GOP, but knowing that Limpballs had a monopoly on Armed Forces radio, I doubt there were many in the armed forces who knew what to believe beyond their orders.

Prior to Lynndie England, I doubt any of the grunts would have considered their orders to have been inappropriate.

Now? I can't imagine what they're feeling.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. Well I appreciate the job that all of military personel perform
on behalf of our country.

You are right we have to get the world involved in trying to come up with solutions to fix those issues in countries like Somalia. Somalia has a vacuum in the government area, there is no true central government and it will be hard to get anything done until that is resolved.

Issues like other countries overfishing the Somali coast and illegally dumping toxic waste off the coast have to be resolved in order to stop piracy and other crimes.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
7. But.... but... but...
Don't you know Barack has a whole SEABAG of "spare" ships!! Why, they're like bathroom rubber duckies, you find them everywhere!

Never mind that Bush has gutted USN to the quick....

Many nations already have sent assets--Germany, Japan, India, others. It would help if they'd cobble together a multinational task force with a serious, direct, rotating mission, a plain chain of command, and precise goals and strategies-- something with a UN imprimatur on it would be especially nice...IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
8. (shrug) What's available depends almost entirely on what Obama says is available...
There's of course no doubt that help from other countries is needed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. "what Obama says is available"! Does Obama have a magic wand to create more troops and equipment? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
10. Cheer up, DoD budgets will be cut more & troops ordered to do more. Meanwhile Obama supporters will
flock away from recruiters seeking more bodies to fight Obama's wars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #10
25. which "Obama supporters"?
all of them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alarimer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 07:42 AM
Response to Reply #10
32. Yes hopefully that bloated budget will be cut.
And no more cannon fodder for stupid illegal immoral wars.

We are not the world's police. If people want to stop piracy, other countries are going to have to help. Otherwise, tough shit. Just pay them off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bridgit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
12. Appreciate your thoughts here...
Stay Safe :kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
13. What's the big deal about patrolling an area twice the size of Texas with a few 35mph vehicles??
:rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NutmegYankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
14. Shhh. People might realize we use our submarines all the time.
Edited on Mon Apr-13-09 09:06 PM by NutmegYankee
You could burst their bubble of ignorance about what Submarines do! After all, they know their only cold war weapons because they saw a movie with Sean Connery and Alec Baldwin!


On a serious note, I couldn't agree more. It's a sickening OpTempo for all branches.

On Edit: Spelling. Also to add that I have friends and family out there, both in the water and in the desert. One is going onto his third combat tour.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Okay, Nutmeger, here's another Nutmeg scene...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NutmegYankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. I take it you were a GUPPY submariner?
IA or II?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Dad was. I think the Robin was IA. The expensive version.
Not a Fleet Snorkel, the cheapo version.

The Robin was the fastest boat outta Groton on the day it was decommissioned. Sad day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NutmegYankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. I have to say, those boats had style. Much more before the GUPPY mods.
They just looked elegant versus the sleek round versions of today slipping by the waterfront.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. You could look down the pier and tell which was which because there were...
Edited on Mon Apr-13-09 09:34 PM by Captain Hilts
so many different kinds. I guess it was easy for the Soviets to do so also.

I guess it's 'progress' that they look alike, I just wish they named 'em after fish still, that way they'd have cute pictures of fish wearing sailors caps and boxing gloves as logos instead of state/city mottos.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcadian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
15. Is this the Navy's official policy? Are you with public affairs?
I take public servants using the weight behind their titles very seriously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Obamanaut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #15
22. Can't speak to "official policy" but I can read papers, use internets,
piece together bits of information. There was a never-quite-reached goal of a 600 ship Navy way back when. With draw-downs and normal attrition without replacement, I believe the current total is not quite half that. Toss a few out of service for dry-dock, overhaul, what have you and behold! you are stretched thin.

There may well be a statement or two on the Navy web site that will give you more insight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
margotb822 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #15
28. These are my opinions
as someone who works directly on ships and with ship scheduling. I know what we've got, what we can do, and what we're scheduled to do. I'm sure the Navy's position is that we'll do what we're told to the best of our ability.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
16. I think it will be very interesting..
to see what happens. I am so used to our normal goals and methods, that I have a hard time believing things will be any different this time.

http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/North_Africa/North_Africa_page.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
23. Thanks for the comments, margotb822. I keep asking why in the world WE should be
doing the police work there. Let these shipping companies pay for escorts or security teams on board. Our navy has its own duties and obligations to fulfill.

Great point about Somalia's current state of anarchy.

Thanks for your service.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
24. And yet -------- shipmates PERFORM against all odds!1 Anchors aWEIGH!1 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Obamanaut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-13-09 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
27. Stay safe. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 12:06 AM
Response to Original message
29. And Obama has said that it requires an international solution
I agree with that. The US can't be responsible for all the world's problems. So far, the piracy has affected other countries much more than it has affected the US. I don't claim to know what the answer is, it is up to those who know what is going on.

The piracy problem is yet another situation that W has left for Obama to clean up, it has been going on for several years, and W seemed to totally ignore it.

I think it was appropriate for the Navy to get involved in this case, because there was a hostage crisis in international waters. It was a job well done, and their job there is finished.

I was just chatting with a friend of mine from Singapore and she was saying that they are now shipping cargo around the Cape and taking the long way instead of going through the Suez Canal. That is going to affect Europe a lot more than it affects us.

Stay safe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
14thColony Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 06:47 AM
Response to Original message
30. Hi margotb822
Replying to your OP so it's more visible, not to try to school you or anything.

I dunno how much it's reported in the US, since I don't live there, but as a NATO-assigned US officer peripherally working this issue, folks back home are probably not aware of how many non-US warships are involved in anti-piracy ops in that area. At any given time there are 15-20 warships patrolling, of which as few as 2-3 are USN - not meaning the USN isn't doing enough, but merely pointing out other countries are stepping up too, and have been for a while.

All in all the following countries have at least one warship either there already, enroute, or recently departed: Portugal, Canada, Spain, US, Germany (1 destroyer, 1 resupply), The Netherlands, France, Sweden (2 corvettes), Denmark, Greece, Turkey, UK, Russia (3-4 destroyers/amphib asslt ships), China (2 destroyers, 1 resupply ship), Japan (2 destroyers enroute), India (1 destroyer, 1 frigate), South Korea, Malaysia, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Iran (1-2 frigates/patrol boats).

I'm probably even missing a few - might be a UAE patrol vessel enroute as well, IIRC.

Bottomline is other countries are involved, and some have been in the thick of it for a while -- the French Navy has even done 'hot pursuit' inland, chasing pirates with Marines and attack helos.

So how is it being portrayed in the US press? As 'nobody else is helping?' Just curious.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
margotb822 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #30
33. I've been in the area
I know that there are many other coalition warships out there. Rachel Maddow even did a piece last night about EU and NATO efforts in the area.

I think the problem in the US is two-fold. First, people want the US to protect US shipping specifically. People knew about the pirates, but it wasn't a big deal until it happened to us. People have been so conditioned to think that a military response is they only way of solving a crisis. No matter which way you slice it the US has more ships than any other Navy (usually by 10-fold). I think people wonder "what else" we're doing that we can't all just run over there and blast the pirates out of the water. The fact is that 2-3 ships is what we can supply due to our other missions.

Second, people are portraying this as solely about the pirates, and not as a consequence of the fact that Somalia hasn't had a government for about 20 years. People who say that piracy started because of outside events are being called "apologists." Overall, in fact, the whole world's response to crises in Africa has been deficient. Somalia is no different. But, it's something that the US can't solve on it's own, and would actually be a good example of something that we could let other countries take the lead in. We don't have to do everything, but we can't do it all on our own.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
14thColony Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #33
35. I've only hung out in West Africa
but we've got a guy from my org riding around on SNMG1's flagship right now as they do anti-piracy ops off Somalia/GoA.

I agree 100 percent with what you say. Hell, even if we could spare 20 destroyers or frigates to add to the 15 or so non-US ones out there, I seriously doubt we could put a stop to the piracy. Big chunk of ocean, and it's not like the pirate vessels are particularly obvious until they start a-piratin' someone.

As you say, there are some serious systemic root causes to this going back decades, and a military response can do little more than attempt to affect this specific syptom, not the root cause(s).

As I've noted elsewhere at DU, there is a certain irony that the one group able to effectively neutralize the pirates was the Islamic Courts government, which we assisted Ethiopia is deposing because they were, well, Islamist. The law of unintended consequences strikes again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alarimer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 07:40 AM
Response to Original message
31. It doesn't have to be us, you know.
There are other countries that can do it. Their ships get hijacked too. Seems to me that we cannot be the world's police here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
margotb822 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #31
34. Funny that we rarely hear about it
What did they say on the news last night? 64 ships have been hijacked this year? Yea, it's happening to everyone. We've all got a stake in this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ForrestGump Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
36. We don't need no steenking ships

Drop the SEALs in there with a few MREs and underwater scooters and they'll have it all cleaned up by the Third Act. I seen it in a movie.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
conscious evolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
37. When do we invade Somalia?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC