Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Minicars perform poorly in crash tests, study says

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 04:25 PM
Original message
Minicars perform poorly in crash tests, study says
Minicars made by Toyota, Honda and Daimler AG did poorly on frontal crash tests with mid-sized automobiles, prompting an influential safety organization to suggest consumers consider buying larger cars that have comparable fuel economy.

The Toyota Yaris, Honda Fit and Smart ForTwo all collapsed upon impact into the space around the driver dummy, according to the study released today by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety.

Drivers in all three vehicles faced high risk of head and leg injuries after test collisions at 40 miles an hour, even after airbags inflated, said the non-profit group funded by auto insurers.

The study could prompt more debate on minicar safety as several automakers continue developing such vehicles for North America. Just last week, Stefan Jacoby, CEO of Volkswagen Group of America, said VW would consider bringing its European Up minicar brand to the U.S. in future years.

"Size still matters," Institute President Adrian Lund said in a statement. "Though much safer than they were a few years ago, minicars as a group do a comparatively poor job of protecting people in crashes."

Safer options recommended

The group recommended that consumers consider purchasing some larger cars that offer superior safety to the mini and micro autos.

It cited the VW Jetta diesel, the Toyota Camry hybrid and the Ford Fusion hybrid.

"Many cars just a little bit bigger get close to, or the same mpg as the mini and micro cars we tested," Institute spokesman Russ Rader said in an e-mail.

Smart called the 40 mph test and the frontal crash position "rare and extreme" in the case of the ForTwo.

The severity of the test collision "is unlikely to occur in real world crashes," Smart USA President Dave Schembri said in a statement. "Smart has a proven track record of safety with approximately one million cars on the road in 37 countries."

Customers drive small cars for reasons other than fuel economy, including value, parking convenience, and fun, he added.

Toyota, in a statement, said the real question for a "comprehensive safety assessment" is how well the vehicle's safety systems perform in real-world accidents.

"According to NHTSA data, less than 0.06 percent of all frontal crashes occur at the crash severity selected by the IIHS," the statement said.

"The coexistence of large and small vehicles and the safety implications when the two are in a collision has been discussed for several years. According to NHTSA, vehicle safety in all car classes continues to improve, in part due to the active and passive safety features developed by the automotive industry."

All three mini and micro cars had performed well in more typical crash tests with vehicles smashing into a barrier.

While these tests showed how well the small cars matched up against each other, they didn't reveal their safety performance in crashes with larger cars, Lund said.

In the latest tests, the Toyota Yaris crashed into a Toyota Camry, the Honda Fit collided with a Honda Accord, and a Smart ForTwo crashed into a Mercedes C Class.

In these collisions, the driver dummies in the smaller cars faced "intrusions" on their space from windshield pillars, instrument panels, toe boards and steering wheels, Lund said.

"While head-on collisions at 40 miles an hour are rare, it's these crashes that often cause serious injury and death," Lund said.

The medium-sized cars fared far better in the tests.

Analysis of fuel economy

A look at fuel economy confirms the Institute's claims that some larger cars get results comparable to those of the mini and micro models.

The 2009 Yaris gets fuel economy of 29 mpg in the city and 35 on the highway, according to Environmental Protection Agency results published on Department of Energy Web site www.fueleconomy.gov.

The 2009 Fit gets 28 mpg in the city and 35 on the highway, while the Smart ForTwo convertible gets 33 mpg in the city and 41 on the highway, according to the site.

Among the larger cars recommended by the Institute, the Jetta diesel gets 29 mpg in the city and 40 on the highway, while the Camry hybrid gets 33 mpg in the city and 34 on the highway.

According to a Ford spokesman, the 2010 Fusion hybrid gets 41 mpg in the city and 36 on the highway.

In 2007, the death rate for minicars was substantially higher than those for larger cars in both single-vehicle and multiple-vehicle crashes, the Institute said.

The death rate was almost twice as high for one- to-three-year-old mini cars in multiple-vehicle crashes as the rate for very large cars, it said. In single-vehicle crashes, the death rate for minis was more than three times as great as for very large cars.


(posted in total, subscription only)


I guess the guy from Smart never drove in NJ rush hour traffic.


http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20090414/ANA05/904130289/1181
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Liberal Veteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. In other news "Water found to be more moist than desert sand".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enlightenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. Well, that's really not useful.
Fuel economy is not the ONLY reason people drive the smaller cars. Price is another. And price is more likely to force a choice than fuel mileage - or safety.

The mini cars (weird category):
Yaris - $12,205 - $15,880
Fit - Starts at $14,750
Smart for Two - $12,000 - $17,000 ($14,000 is average)

The recommended replacements:
VW Jetta diesel - $18,000 to $23,000
Toyota Camry hybrid - $26,150
Ford Fusion hybrid - Starts at $27,270


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sal Minella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. One thing they're NOT considering his how much more maneuverable little cars are.
I avoided accidents several times driving a VW sedan in the 'seventies -- the stopping distance is very short and a little car is much more maneuverable -- easy to avoid having an accident.

I doubt that the quick stops and maneuverability are taken into consideration when computing safety of the smaller cars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. I would expect also the paranoia factor
I ride motorbikes, and operate on the assumption that I am invisible, yet other motorists have a homing signal and mean to run me down. :D

I am a very aware rider. I expect drivers of all small vehicles are significantly more focused on the task at hand than those in bigger ones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sal Minella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Also helps to assume everybody on the road is drunk or stoned AND trying to kill you.
A pickup pulling a huge boat was in front of me signaling a right turn, and then turned left right in front of me. Since I was going very slowly (already having assumed the driver of the truck was drunk) I could stop without wrinkling anybody's fenders or propellers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KakistocracyHater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. so make a special lane for them
otherwise those suvs will "win" the who's biggest contest, that doesn't make filling the suv gastank affordable & it doesn't make the suv less likely to roll over when turning too quickly.

Make a special lane for the electrics, & put the over-big suvs into another lane.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. No, the midsize cars perform poorly ...
at limiting their damage to the minicars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
7. That hasn't always been the case ...


A Mini Cooper (left) compared to a pre-2004 F150 (right) after the same impact. The thing to look at is the "legs" of the dummies.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
corruptmewithpower Donating Member (411 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
8. Train vs. minicar
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 02:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC