Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is "homeland" an appropriate term for the United States?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
mix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 08:14 PM
Original message
Poll question: Is "homeland" an appropriate term for the United States?
Edited on Tue Apr-14-09 08:34 PM by mix
For me, it is too volkisch, too similar to Heimatland and Vaterland.

Where did this term come from and why has it become a part of our national lexicon? Do you use it in daily conversation?

Will it ever go away or has it stuck because of the Department of Homeland Security?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. I've never used it..
and never heard of it in reference to the contiguous United States..which I'm assuming is what it means?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Der Homeland is der Volksfront
:P

Seriously, the National Socialism connection is too obvious to be denied
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSlayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. It's a bit too close to "Fatherland" for my taste.
I've never heard anyone use the term in an actual conversation though. People do not usually speak that way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
23. It is sinister and exclusionary, classically Bush n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-15-09 06:46 AM
Response to Reply #23
48. and yet it wasn't Bush who came up with the term. It was Gary Hart and Warren Rudman
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-15-09 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #48
72. Hart and Rudman were thoughtless in choosing the term.
It was a dire rhetorical mistake that reflects what is worst in our society.
And Bush in his inimitable way gave it its toxic, exclusionary, and jingoistic edge.
Just a bad choice all around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-15-09 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #2
66. Well, people *DID* use it that way, but...
even in South Africa, they were (eventually) kicked
out of power.

Tesha

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. Deutschland, Deutschland, uber alles.... ummmm, no. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
5. It came from the neocon fascists after 9-11.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-15-09 06:49 AM
Response to Reply #5
51. wrong.
Came from the Hart-Rudman Commission on National Security pre 9/11
http://www.cfr.org/content/publications/attachments/Hart-Rudman3.pdf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-15-09 07:03 AM
Response to Reply #51
55. But it wasn't publicly bandied about until after 9-11
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-15-09 07:43 AM
Response to Reply #55
58. the hart-rudman commission report wasn't a secret
it didn't get a lot of publicity until after 9/11, But it was their recommendation that was picked up on and followed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-15-09 07:45 AM
Response to Reply #58
59. Difference between public record and 24/7 yammering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-15-09 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #59
61. Doesn't change who originated the term
Edited on Wed Apr-15-09 09:23 AM by onenote
and that it was merely Congress following that recommendation.

Did anyone in COngress speak out against using the recommended term?

I don't think so.

I don't much care for the term, but as I've said, I am not going to distort history to hide its origins.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
6. NO ONE that I know of uses it in common speech. I wouldn't use it
if you paid me. Smacks way too much of "Vaterland" for my tastes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
7. It gives me the friggin' creeps when I hear it said. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GTurck Donating Member (569 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-15-09 07:18 AM
Response to Reply #7
56. Second that...
Ever since it has come into use by the previous (and unlamented) administration I have cringed especially when used by those smart enough to understand its meaning. I have lived 66 years and never heard this term anywhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-15-09 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #56
60. I'm 57 and the same for me. When fascist jargon and newspeak entered the lexicon
with the Shrub and gang, frankly, I wasn't surprised but I found it chilling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IDemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
8. Nein
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WestSeattle2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
9. No, it was a term used to incite fear, nothing more. It's silly. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
10. "Nation" was perfectly adequate - problem was our National Security Advisor. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democrats_win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
11. "Funny, I thought it would sound better in the original German." Pat Buchanan
Is it just me or does his name remind you of banana?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cirque du So-What Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
13. Why the hell doesn't 'domestic' work just as well?
I guess the neocons feel it's necessary to differentiate between the 'homeland' and the lands conquered in the quest for empire - the 'colonies.'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
14. Does "Heimat" have negative connotations in Germany?
I always perceived it to be a sentimental term, almost like a fierce love of your local area.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. I am not certain if it does or if it has fallen out of use in Germany today,
but it does have a Nazi connotation. Maybe someone who knows Germany would be able to answer this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #14
29. The connotation has always been of countries that are of a single racial and cultural heritage...
WE, the United States of America, are an inherently diverse nation that has decided deliberately to hang together. E Pluribus Unum: Out of Many, One. WE have always called ourselves a nation or a country.

In the Old Countries people referred to the lands where their ethnic group had resided for a thousand years or more as Fatherland or Motherland or Homeland.

I think how badly Bush's use of the term "The Homeland" set one's teeth on edge may be a function of age. I was born after WW II, but it was still all around us. Movies and comic books, even the funny pages in the newspaper, were full of stock villains from the Nazi Party. "The Homeland" was one of the terms for the Third Reich, self-chosen by the Germans along with "Fatherland." "Are your papers in order? Hand them over," was another genuine Nazi phrase, with the recipient cowering before menacing uniformed figures, sweating it out hoping not to be yanked off the railroad train. That shit was real, not just for the movies, as anyone who lived in Europe during those years could tell you.

The last 8 years have been a nightmare on so many levels....

Hekate


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #29
33. beautifully put, that is why it inherently grates on most people
by the way I'm from Carpinteria, miss the coast and the waves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #33
36. If I moved away from the Central Coast I'd miss it too. Carp is nice.
:hi:

Hekate


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-15-09 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #33
69. Carpinteria is a magical place. How does it feel to be landlocked? Kinda scary?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
16. You need a "F**K NO" option.
But yeah.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. done n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Too late for me, but thanks. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juno jones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-15-09 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #19
62. But not for me. Thank you for including that.
Fuck no.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doctor jazz Donating Member (474 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 08:33 PM
Response to Original message
17. You put 3 questions in the post but my response to the subject line is no.
...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
santamargarita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
20. Everything that happened under Bush inherently sucks
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InkAddict Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
21. Yuck, it makes me think of Julie Andrews' Edelweiss
from Sound of Music - sweet and sappy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
22. We did fine with "NATION" since the days of George Washington
who, for the purposes of this discussion, we'll call the GREATER George.

Pity it took the LESSER, nay, the LEAST George to fuck that up. So fuck no, it is!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #22
30. Pres. Washington is George the Great. George Bush Sr is just Bush. GWB is Bush the Lesser.
You're welcome. :hi:

Hekate


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
morgan2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
24. its an awful term
meant to stoke nationalism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peace13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
25. I voted no but i will add....
Maybe...if you are naming it with the American Indians in mind!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
26. The term makes me ill
:puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke:
:puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke:
:puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
27. I NEVER WANT TO HEAR THAT WORD AGAIN!
The United States is my COUNTRY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trayfoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
28. I haven't liked it since its introduction - does NOT suit the U.S.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
31. Where did it come from? From the Dept. of Homeland Security. It was a Bush
administration tactic designed to instill fear.

I hate it too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. exactly, and me, too
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-15-09 06:47 AM
Response to Reply #31
49. Wrong. It was the product of a pre 9/11 recommendation by the Hart-Rudman Commission
Edited on Wed Apr-15-09 06:50 AM by onenote
I'm not a fan of the term, but I'm not going to distort history either
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
34. No.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoSheep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
35. No.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
37. absolutely not.
I've hated that term ever since the Bushes started using it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
38. It's a fascist term.
Edited on Tue Apr-14-09 10:43 PM by backscatter712
It frames things in the fascist "us-versus-them" mindset - the Homeland (TM) versus the "Otherland". Very Orwellian.

The term needs to go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-14-09 11:42 PM
Response to Original message
39. "Yes" people
tell us why you like the term...that would interest me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-15-09 06:48 AM
Response to Reply #39
50. i don't like or dislike it
I don't recall a lot of belly aching about the term when it first surfaced pre 9/11 in a report on national security prepared for Congress by the (Gary)Hart/(Warren) Rudman Commission.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kitty Herder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-15-09 12:41 AM
Response to Original message
40. Not only does it sound fascist,
it's a poor term for people of predominantly European descent, like myself, to be using about a land to which we are not native, and that we stole from its native inhabitants through an act of genocide.

Sorry if that offends anyone, but that's how I see it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-15-09 12:43 AM
Response to Original message
41. Yes if we are a Nazi republic
:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-15-09 12:47 AM
Response to Original message
42. Homeland, Fatherland, Motherland - all portend jingoism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
timtom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-15-09 01:48 AM
Response to Original message
43. I, of course voted, "F**k no!"
And if the exclamation isn't in the original poll selection, it is still what I intended!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-15-09 02:28 AM
Response to Original message
44. I voted f* no. It always reminded me of South Africa and arpartheid. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-15-09 06:31 AM
Response to Original message
45. I despise the term. Every time I hear it I think of Hitler.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ForrestGump Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-15-09 06:33 AM
Response to Original message
46. Not at all. They would have been more honest naming it the far more appropriate

Reich.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-15-09 06:45 AM
Response to Original message
47. it came from Gary Hart and Warren Rudman -- before 9/11
http://www.cfr.org/content/publications/attachments/Hart-Rudman3.pdf

The Hart-Rudman report, submitted to Congress in 2000, recommended the establishment of a National Homeland Security Agency.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-15-09 07:33 AM
Response to Reply #47
57. Thanks for the research
I did not know that it had bi-partisan origins. Has anyone ever asked Hart or Rudman why they chose that term?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Control-Z Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-15-09 06:51 AM
Response to Original message
52. I clicked no
then saw the F**K no option and went back to correct myself.

To me, it is the post 911, Bush initiates the destruction our country, term. I hate it and will never use it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juno jones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-15-09 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #52
63. Same here.
Edited on Wed Apr-15-09 09:41 AM by juno jones
:) My first reaction was F NO! and expected only to see a mild 'no' as a response. Upon seeing the expletive in all it's glory I replied joyfully; Fucking-A!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Postman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-15-09 06:55 AM
Response to Original message
53. I prefer ....Ein Volk, Ein Reich, Ein Fuhrer...
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-15-09 06:55 AM
Response to Original message
54. we have to scrap that term, bush speak must go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aristus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-15-09 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
64. I remember that it was only a few months after the whole "Homeland Security" thing was passed
into law that some TV show about Federal agents started using the term "HomeSec". I thought: "Great. It's already got a cute nickname smacking of breezy familiarity!" :eyes:

That, or scarily NewSpeak sounding... :scared::hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-15-09 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
65. It's a very NAZI sounding term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-15-09 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #65
67. Chosen and used by people in our govt who are of the same fascist mindset
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-15-09 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #67
68. people like Gary Hart and Bill Clinton?
Edited on Wed Apr-15-09 05:16 PM by onenote
Just because you didn't notice doesn't mean the term homeland wasn't being used by the government before 9/11. It was used by President Clinton in a 1998 presidential directive entitled "Protection Against Unconventional Threats to the Homeland and Americans Overseas." And the recommendation to create a department of homeland security was found in the per 9/11 report of the Hart-Rudman Commission.

http://biotech.law.lsu.edu/blaw/general/pdd62.htm


As I've said elsewhere on this thread, I'm no fan of the term "homeland" but I'm not going to distort history by ignoring its origins.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-15-09 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #68
70. Huge difference between its use in a directive 10 yrs ago vs 24/7 usage in mass media...
...as a means of conditioning the public mind. Although I acknowledge that the intent to use the guise of terrorism for all sorts of nefarious corporate/state activity was ongoing while Clinton held office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-15-09 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #70
71. wrong. It was the product of a pre 9/11 recommendation by the Hart-Rudman Commission
its part of a continuum. It was used after 9/11 because congress voted to adopt the Hart-Rudman Commission's recommendation to create a separate homeland security department. I don't recall any Democrats in Congress objecting to the term, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC