Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I want this thread to be a RESPECTFUL disucussion of the decision to not prosecute torture

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 07:07 PM
Original message
I want this thread to be a RESPECTFUL disucussion of the decision to not prosecute torture
Edited on Thu Apr-16-09 07:13 PM by Stinky The Clown
I am very disappointed in the administration's disinclination to prosecute known crimes.




edit to correct the meaning - changed "inclination" to "disinclination"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. I am disappointed too - and so is Keith Olbermann, who is covering it now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllieB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'm watching KO right now.
I'm very very disappointed in the Obama Administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. I respectfully think Obama is shielding Bush by not forcing those...
lower in the food chain to talk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. That sort of makes no sense
I have no idea if your assertion is true or not, so I am not arguing that. I am simply saying that it makes no sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. If everyone in Watergate (including Dean) were given blanket immunity...
would Nixon's crimes ever have been revealed?

Dean talked because he was looking at a prison sentence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. Good luck with that. It's only a matter of time before the "Obama is a war criminal" folks show up..
But yah - it's hugely disappointing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #4
22. interesting assumpation of the comment of Obama is a war criminal.
Senator Leahy will not get any repigs stepping up to the plate on any sort of investigation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LakeSamish706 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
5. Not sure what the point of releasing the memo's today was if they are not going...
Edited on Thu Apr-16-09 07:13 PM by LakeSamish706
to go after some of the people that were involved in these crimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Actually, that's the good part.
As John Dean just said on Olbermann's show ...... having him release the memos tells us he doesn't plan to use the methods.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. No. I read that Holder officially rescinded all memos and the use of those techniques today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. Uh ..... I think we agree, don't we?
He released the memos which is tantamount to saying he isn't going to do that. Then they rescind the 'orders' implicit in the memos, making it official that they're not going to do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Yes, we agree. Sorry for the confusion, I meant "no" as in "no they don't plan to continue"
Sorry
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Dean also said he has left a door open for prosecutions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #11
20. I admire Dean, but I think the door is kind of closing unless we pry it open.
I hope the ACLU comes up with something, this decision is horrible, and the practices of the bush regime deemed to reappear again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. I think he was referring to the lawyers - they could be prosecuted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. another thing that Dean said that I remain hopeful is that
the Spain court has not said they will not prosecute the 6 bush thugs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. This was just posted...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #11
23. I think he did leave a door open, certainly for those not listed as being...
protected from prosecution. None of the DOJ officials who authorized this are covered under the protection from prosecution, none of them.

"will not prosecute CIA officers"

None of the people who authorized this in the memos, etc, are CIA officers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #23
28. That's the only faint hope I have in all this .......
.... and for me, I actually don't care all that much about the CIA guys. I want the gangleaders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #28
35. On legal issues like this, it is very telling what is NOT said as well as what is...
and not listing anyone BUT the CIA officers as being protected from prosecution sends a very clear message that those NOT on the 'protected' list are vulnerable to prosecution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LakeSamish706 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. Yeah, I understand that and would not have expected him to use such means....
But when all of the public (If many get to read/hear about what the memo's contain) they may demand investigations and indictments, I hope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
6. I agree. It's disheartening to say the very least.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
8. I'm disgusted
respectfully
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
12. Elizabeth I didn't want to behead Mary Queen of Scots, either.
Didn't like the precedent. But she finally got off her ass and did it. Sometimes it just takes time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antigop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
13. I'm more than disappointed. I'm angry. n/t
Edited on Thu Apr-16-09 07:18 PM by antigop
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
18. On the bright side, nothing was said about immunity for the ones who gave the orders
But you're right, of course. Torture is a CLEAR violation of the Geneva Conventions AND Title 18 of the U.S.C. § 2340.

I don't think there's much "wiggle room" if the law is invoked in a court of law. It's clearly a crime.

BUT the question is, who's going to prosecute it? It would be a minefield of "political interference" accusations and YOU KNOW they're going to use The Military Commissions Act to defend this.

No prosecutor in his right mind is going to touch this unless ORDERED to do so.

And I don't think Holder has the guts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Qutzupalotl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
19. Prosense has a great thread on this subject:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x5473136

As I understand it, the door is still open for prosecuting the higher-ups who authorized torture.

I'll concede that it is the usual practice to go after the lower-ranks and get them to turn on the higher-ups. My suspicion is that this was not done here because of the unique position of the CIA (too much power)--but I also think more culpability lies at the top anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
24. Well ..... Olbermann left us with little more to discuss
The past is prelude.

Mr. Obama has made the easiest mistake a national leader can make - to think that "just following orders" is worthy of a pass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #24
30. but these practices are not worthy of a pass.
Edited on Thu Apr-16-09 07:39 PM by bdamomma
doesn't anyone else feel dirty and frustrated about this, we are all involved in these horrible practices, I just see Cheney chuckling away, I want to see justice done to these thugs, damn them all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
26. I would suggest that these are some very calculated decisions by the Obama Administration.
He has released the paperwork from the Bush Admin which shows what they were doing. His next decision is politcal and the decision not to publicly go after these things. Unfortunately, politics do run this country. If he goes all out pursuing Bush criminalities may well ruin his administration.

I would not be surprised if a couple of years from now, there actually some interesting indictments announced by the JD.

just sayin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #26
32. or the bush thugs may ruin President Obama.......something to think about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marlakay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
29. That's how I feel, I think Obama is great but
I am very very very upset about this and think Keith is right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laelth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
31. I can only assume ...
That we traded justice for the peaceful transfer of power. I suspect Bush made it very clear that he would declare martial law and invalidate the 2008 election if Obama did not give his administration immunity from prosecution.

This sux, and I am not happy about it, but the peaceful transfer of power is, ultimately, probably worth it.

:dem:

-Laelth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. all this stuff makes me just shake my head.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. That's sort of impossible
Think of Charlie, Lucy, and the football.

Bush sez tee it up. Obama sez okay. Bush leaves office. Bush tries to kick it and falls on his ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #31
38. ??
:tinfoilhat:

:wtf: are you talking about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kaleva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
36. MacArthur made the Imperial family off limits to prosecution
for war crimes. This wasn't fair to the millions of victims of Japanese war crimes nor was it fair for those Japanese who were imprisoned or executed. It was done for political reasons for a docile, friendly Emperor greatly increased the chances the Japanese population would tolerate the occupation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
37. Nuremberg did not occur until the war was over.
Right now, the war is not over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #37
39. What war is that?
We have so many.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HopeOverFear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
40. Let Cheney Yoo and 'em think they got away with it
don't ANNOUNCE you're going to prosecute immediately, so they can skip the country. Damn, don't ya'll watch Law & Order? LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notesdev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
41. It's perfectly in line
with the failure to persecute financial fraud.


Welcome to America, the land of the free getting away with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rateyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
42. You may get a respectful discussion, but those who refuse to prosecute
war crimes get NO fucking respect from me. NONE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 06:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC