|
Even the Bible. Think of the similarities of God granting occupied land to the original Hebrews for obeying him, and Columbus claiming and occupied land for the Europeans so he could bring Christ to the "savages."
Every great nation has them, and they are generally created to justify the existence of a nation that had to conquer someone else to exist. In the later 19th century, we were very aware that we were slaughtering the original inhabitants of this nation and stealing their land. To justify this and soothe our collective conscience, we developed a series of stories--an American mythology--to explain why we were really the owners of the land, and were justified in our conquests. Pilgrims, Thanksgiving, religious freedom, and Columbus all played a role in laying our claim. America was a savage land until discovered by a white European, who (and this is wrong) just accidentally found the place while looking for something else. He was Christian (notice how they got that into the mix, since our leaders in 1776 were rarely Christian), he was virtuous, he was kind and patient and paternal, and he had only the best interests of the natives at heart.
Next came the Pilgrims and others trying to escape religious oppression in England (notice the mythological justification for both the settlement here and the rebellion against England), then Thanksgiving when the "Indians" welcomed us and we shared our feast with them (notice the mythological acceptance into this land by the original inhabitants, justifying the later slaughter of the ingrate natives who were trying to take our land back from us).
The truth is much different than the myth. Columbus knew the Americas were here. His ships were loaded with weapons and supplies for a long siege and a settlement. Columbus wasn't trying to discover India, he was trying to conquer and settle, to find his wealth. There were stories all over Ireland, the Canary Islands, and Portugal and Spain that there was a land over here. Columbus wasn't a virtuous Christian, not even by the standards of his time. It is often said he died broke and out of favor with the crown because of his failures, but in truth he died very wealthy. He was out of favor with the crown because they were horrified--even by their standards--by the slaughter and enslavement Columbus brought to the Americas. On one of his journeys back to Europe, he brought several Native American slaves for Queen Isabella. She ordered them sent back to their families.
As for the Pilgrims, they were one group of settlers. They weren't the first, the biggest, the most successful--they were simply the most appropriate for the Founders Mythology because they fled religious oppression in England. More settlers came over for wealth, to exploit the land or find gold. More settlers were sent here as prisoners than came here for religious freedom. But criminals and exploiters make lousy Founders Myths. Thus, we celebrate the Pilgrims and Thanksgiving (where in reality the Native Americans shared their ancient holiday with the Pilgrims, not the other way around), and not the prison colonies in Georgia.
Columbus the person wasn't and isn't important. It is the myth of a white, Christian European "discovering" a "new" world that gives us our pretense to the land. Even now, simply abandoning Columbus (though we should) would just generate a new Founders Myth, showing how our white ancestors were brutal thugs, but we now are so much wiser and more gracious.
So, people won't give up Columbus. It has nothing to do with Columbus.
|