Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Shooting May Have Been Sparked By Sidewalk Chalk

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-17-09 08:44 PM
Original message
Shooting May Have Been Sparked By Sidewalk Chalk
Shooting May Have Been Sparked By Sidewalk Chalk

COLUMBUS, Ohio — Police believe that sidewalk chalk may have promoted a shooting on Thursday that left one man injured and another in jail.

The shooting occurred at about 4 p.m. in front of a home on Sestos Drive, located on the city's south side.

According to police, four children were using chalk to draw on a sidewalk when Jeffrey McDowell, 59, came out of his home and told them to stop, 10TV News reported.

The children ran inside their home and told their mother's boyfriend, Shawn Jarvis, that McDowell used foul language while telling them to stop using the chalk.

Jarvis went outside to confront McDowell and McDowell allegedly pulled a gun and shot Jarvis in the hand, 10TV News reported.

http://www.10tv.com/live/content/local/stories/2009/04/17/story_chalk.html?sid=102

My headline would have been:
Violence May Have Been Sparked By Sidewalk Chalk

Shooting was over the line, but so would have been beating, hitting, stabbing, etc and so on.

Can't people just chill the hell out???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-17-09 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. If the children had guns instead of chalk, McDowell wouldn't have had a chance.
And that's one to grow on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-17-09 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. If the kids had cars they could of run him over too
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-17-09 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Lets split the difference. If the kids had pitbulls...
nah, nevermind. The pitbulls would have eaten the children, stolen the gun, carjacked a ride and driven down the sidewalk killing everyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-17-09 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Who is calling for children to possess guns?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asdjrocky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-17-09 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. That's it, I'm convinced...
We need to arm the children.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-17-09 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Good thing it is just you calling for that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-18-09 12:42 AM
Response to Reply #4
12. I was declared an armed menace by my high school vice principal
I took exception to the ritual bullying of the new kid and dropped the three seniors on the varsity football offensive line. He was also the football coach. He argued that I should have accepted the beat down rather than defend myself. He would have been a Brady Bunch supporter if he were around today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
varelse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-17-09 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
5. If anyone involved had put common sense, courtesy, and decency in play
there'd have been no violence of any kind.

Kids could have used their chalk where it didn't piss off a neighbor.

Neighbor could have had a polite conversation with the parents about the use of chalk on the (public) sidewalk in front of his house.

Parents could have 1) told the kids to clean up the chalk and use it on a portion of the sidewalk near a more tolerant neighbor 2) had a firm but polite chat with grumpy neighbor over use of language.

Why can't people treat each other with the same respect each of them feels they personally deserve?

Probably because people no longer realize that respect is mutual by nature. It's never a one-way street.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tangerine LaBamba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-17-09 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. When we were kids, and got yelled at by a grouchy neighbor,
we knew not to go home and complain because our parents would have gotten right on us for bothering the grouchy neighbor.

Let's face it, folks: we're raising vegetables, not kids.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inwiththenew Donating Member (163 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-17-09 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
7. We should ban chalk
For the children safety.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-17-09 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Banning the kids is a better idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codeine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-17-09 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
11. Because people are idiots about their precious offspring.
Any criticism of their children is met with a full frontal assault, be it criticism from a teacher, law enforcement, or simply a neighbor. Parents are - in the main - pathetic imbeciles raising a generation of even more pathetic uber-imbeciles who will plague us all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC