Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Psycho: Bush's Willing Medical Torturers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
laststeamtrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-18-09 10:39 AM
Original message
Psycho: Bush's Willing Medical Torturers

Jacob Heilbrunn
Author, They Knew They Were Right: the Rise of the Neocons
Posted April 18, 2009 | 11:13 AM (EST)

Psycho: Bush's Willing Medical Torturers



The Washington Post features an exposé today by Joby Warrick and Peter Finn that further illuminates the darkest recesses of the Bush administration's so-called "enhanced interrogation program." Numerous psychologists, physicians, and other health officials, the Post reports, played a key role in not only drawing up but also implementing the torture of suspected terrorists.

The Hippocratic oath says "First, do no harm." The malignant credo of these medical professionals was that they could torture up to the point of not causing permanent harm. They were not government civil servants but contract employees. They were not remotely under any compulsion to authorize torture. But whether from venality or sadism or misguided notions of protecting national security, or some combination of all three, they have forfeited the right to practice medicine. Under the guise of extracting information from alleged terrorists, they themselves sought to terrorize. They should be identified and disbarred.

As the New York Times underscores today, these measures were not only morally abhorrent, but also utterly ineffective. CIA higher-ups, for example, insisted on torturing al Qaeda figure Abu Zubaydah even after he already had volunteered valuable information. The brutal interrogations accomplished nothing. Which points to the real culprit--George Tenet, no doubt trying to please George W. Bush and Dick Cheney, by showing that he could act decisively to protect national security.

Cheney and his henchman David Addington were obsessed with rolling back the reforms that the Church committee, which investigated CIA abuses in the 1970s, had prompted in the intelligence services. Cowardly congressional liberals, they thought, had emasculated America's defenses. Cheney and Addington didn't believe that they were ever any abuses. So he and Bush went them one better.

President Obama, who entered Washington preaching bipartisanship, doesn't want to go prosecute the perpetrators. But the sheer degradation and incompetence of the Bush administration demands some kind of reckoning. Simply releasing the documents about its embrace of torture has further soiled Bush and Cheney's legacy. But whether that is punishment enough is another matter. ... http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jacob-heilbrunn/psycho-bushs-willing-medi_b_188557.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AzDar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-18-09 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
1. K & R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-18-09 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. The Hannibal Lechters of the Federal Government.
The ones I've me were creepy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC