Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Joan Walsh: Impeach Jay Bybee, and ignore Rahm Emanuel

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
deminks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-19-09 06:57 PM
Original message
Joan Walsh: Impeach Jay Bybee, and ignore Rahm Emanuel
http://www.salon.com/opinion/walsh/politics/2009/04/19/impeach_bybee/index.html?source=rss&aim=/opinion/walsh/politics

The blogosphere has been charged with debate about impeaching Jay Bybee, the deputy attorney general whose name is on arguably the worst torture memo released last Thursday. Bruce Ackerman wrote a convincing case for impeaching Bybee on Friday; today the New York Times joined the cause with a fiery editorial: "These memos make it clear that Mr. Bybee is unfit for a job that requires legal judgment and a respect for the Constitution. Congress should impeach him."

But the editorial goes beyond that point – read the whole thing – to make the case that President Obama and Congress have a legal obligation to investigate the entire chain of command behind Bybee and other government lawyers' sick, skewed defense of torture.

(snip)

Unfortunately, on ABC's "This Week," White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel seemed to say that Obama had ruled out prosecuting not only CIA officials and agents but also higher-ups who authorized the torture.

(snip)

Emanuel can't be the last word on that; he's the politics guy, and sure, there are political risks to pursuing the architects of our torture policy. But the political risks that come with ignoring what happened are so much greater.

(end snips)

FU, Emanuel. 183 times in a month.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MarjorieG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-19-09 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. Isn't just politics, but actual policy needed to help people, like health care.
Having a hard time envisioning a reasonable debate and investigation, without bi-partisan acceptance of the need for this kind of reckoning.

Anyone really remember the Clinton impeachment, 24/7, Turley arguing for it, now amplified up with the seriousness of these crimes, and conducting a gov't at the same time. All for revenge as much as justice. Lower level CIA have a defense, as much as we don't like it. It's not Nuremberg.

May be an end justifies the means, pre-judging outcome, but I don't want this opportunity for other change to be eclipsed.

If GOP and media push for this, a different story. Media other than Joan Walsh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC