Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CREW ASKS OCE TO INVESTIGATE REP. HARMAN IMMEDIATELY

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Fireweed247 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 03:49 PM
Original message
CREW ASKS OCE TO INVESTIGATE REP. HARMAN IMMEDIATELY
Rep. Harman may have committed bribery and may have violated House rules prohibiting members from engaging in ex parte communications with executive or independent agency officials on the merits of matters under their formal consideration; failure to uphold the Code of Ethics for Government Service, and acting in a manner that does not reflect creditably on the House.

CREW asked OPR to investigate whether the Department of Justice dropped the investigation into Rep. Harman based on political considerations, rather than a lack of evidence, as has previously been reported.

Melanie Sloan, executive director of CREW, said today, “If Rep. Harman agreed to try to influence an ongoing criminal investigation in return for help securing a committee chairmanship, her conduct not only violates federal law and House rules, but also her oath to uphold the Constitution. As plum a position as the chair of the Intelligence Committee may be, the political gamesmanship necessary to win it must stop well before the grand jury’s door.” Sloan continued, “This whole sorry episode is also yet another example – as if we needed any more – of the depths to which the Bush Justice Department was willing to sink to advance its political agenda.”

http://www.citizensforethics.org/node/38992
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Fireweed247 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks for the Recs!
:hi:
(and sorry about the yelling-shouldn't have copy and pasted:spank:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fireweed247 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. anyone agree with this?
anyone?




















Bueller?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. K&R
I like this CREW. They have their heads screwed on right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chknltl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
4. KnR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kaleko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
5. How much clout does CREW have?
K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fireweed247 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 12:33 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. not sure
but they are mentioned in this article in the roll call
http://www.rollcall.com/issues/54_117/news/34122-1.html?page=1

"But at least one outside watchdog group sought to keep the focus on Harman. The generally left-leaning Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington issued a call for the Justice Department and the Office of Congressional Ethics to investigate.

“If Rep. Harman agreed to try to influence an ongoing criminal investigation in return for help securing a committee chairmanship, her conduct not only violates federal law and House rules, but also her oath to uphold the Constitution,” CREW Executive Director Melanie Sloan said in a statement.

Whether the still-fledgling OCE is inclined to look at allegations laid out in a single story is difficult to say at such an early point in the office’s operations, said Stefan Passantino, an ethics lawyer at McKenna Long & Aldridge. “The jury is still out on how this group intends to operate,” he said."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nictuku Donating Member (907 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
6. This should be a huge gigantic scandal

It could be an interesting turn of events, that helps overall in the prosecution of the BCF (Bush Crime Family). Think about it, if they (the DOJ) is forced to go after Jane Harman, a Democrat, it is a good way to begin, without the Obama Administration leading the investigation (vs how it would be perceived if he went after just Republicans)

Personally, I don't care what letter they have after their name. I take the Constitution seriously, and I expect a hell of a lot more from our representatives than what we have been getting for decades now.

I'm curious to see how this is covered in the news, or if the mega corporate media will succeed in burying it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 12:16 AM
Response to Original message
7. Big K & R !!!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 12:19 AM
Response to Original message
8. K & R !
Right on!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fireweed247 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
10. kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fireweed247 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-22-09 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
11. kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AzDar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-22-09 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
12. K & R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC