Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WSJ: Cash-strapped cities try private guards over police

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
antigop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 09:03 PM
Original message
WSJ: Cash-strapped cities try private guards over police
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124027127337237011.html

- Facing pressure to crack down on crime amid a record budget deficit, Oakland is joining other U.S. cities that are turning over more law-enforcement duties to private armed guards.

The City Council recently voted to hire International Services Inc., a private security agency, to patrol crime-plagued districts. While a few Oakland retail districts previously have pooled cash to pay for unarmed security services, using public funds to pay for private armed guards would mark a first for the city.

Hiring private guards is less expensive than hiring new officers. Oakland -- facing a record $80 million budget shortfall -- spends about 65% of its budget for police and fire services, including about $250,000 annually, including benefits and salary, on each police officer.

In contrast, for about $200,000 a year the city can contract to hire four private guards to patrol the troubled East Oakland district where four on-duty police officers were killed in March. And the company, not the city, is responsible for insurance for the guards.

Oakland is not alone in seeking to improve public safety while reining in spending. This month, the Chicago City Council, facing a possible $200 million budget deficit, proposed expanding the responsibilities of private armed security forces by authorizing them to write traffic citations. In New Orleans, neighborhood committees have sought to expand special tax incentives to pay for private security for neighborhood patrols.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Arctic Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. I see no good coming from this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. Corporate fascism comes like a thief in the night......
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. Reminds me of my former life in Mexico
when "veladores" (night watchmen) were responsible for patrolling each city block.

And came to our door, once a month, to collect a service fee.

And trash collectors came in donkey drawn carts to collect trash, and were paid by the barrel.

I'm just providing an outsider's perspective...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Funny, my mom just paid hers
I know what you speak off
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WHEN CRABS ROAR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
16. I remember those as well, did a good job, knew the area and us,
but that was in Mexico 40 years ago, different times and country, I don't think it would work here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. That's bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
5. Great!!! I understand blackwater is looking for work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
6. won't be much savings when the lawsuits start up
Private corporation cops? Those corporations are for-profit and they will cut corners until some bad shit happens, then they will pass the responsibilities back to the local governments that hired them. It will be bad. Only winners will be the top guys at the private corporations. Public, hired guns, governing agencies will all loose. Mark my words.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. You echo my thoughts exactly.
The rent-a-cops will be low-paid bullies with little training and a TV-informed conception of police work. (Image of cop pounding citizen's head against concrete wall: Slam! "You have the right"-slam-"to remain silent." -Slam-"Anything you say"-slam, slam! -"may be used against you"-slam! <etc.>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressIn2008 Donating Member (848 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
7. What could go wrong?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Beats me.
"Hey, Becky Sue, lookit this Taser. They let me take it home for practice."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. exactly what the Black Box Voting machines told local governments all over the nation
SSDD
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mopar151 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 03:04 AM
Response to Reply #7
25. Look up "Ludlow Massacre"
Plenty more examples too - Start with Pinkerton, the Blackwater of the 19th century.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
10. This is EXACTLY what Republicans dream off
what's next, private FD? Oh wait, during the fires in SD we had them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulsby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. i have no problem
with a private person (or homeowner's assocation, merchant assocation, etc.) hiring private security.

however, the govt. should employee PUBLIC servants aka peace officers.

this is a very bad idea imo.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. Of course this is, but this is exactly what republicans want
to privatize ALL public services
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulsby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. SOME republicans
most of the repubs i know ARE cops, and trust me they don't want this.

i am a cop myself, used to be a firefighter. i feel strongly that communities have the right to hire their own private security to supplement law enforcement, but that law enforcement is a uniquely govt. role.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. State Senator for cali, guy's extreme
and it is the ones who are in government who want this

Not the rank and file

So lets be clear

Guv'ment is bad, therefore we need to privatize it is believed by many state and federal legislators

At one time that was a meme for the base, but they now allow the base that believes that to run for office
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulsby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. that's just insane.
i remember all the crap the guardian angels got in NYC. i thought that was wrong. the GA's fwiw, were not law enforcement substitutes, and they didn't even CARRY weapons.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. I am talking of state legislators that hate government
and all that it implies and believe that we need to privatize schools, FD, police, roads, all, save perhaps defense

They believe it

And by the way, this guy scares the living daylights out of me

Last time I found him at Starbucks making his usual rant against taxes, I plainly asked how exactly did he expect to be paid if all of us paid zero taxes?

Make it personal... nothing funnier than seeing jaws flap

I wish he was the exception, but in cali, he's the rule


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
12. Police have to be trained, these security guards don't have to
have training - if they are like the blackwater thugs, we are in a shitload of trouble - god help Oakland.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
13. Watch "Robocop" and see how that turns out
What you have is the most nightmarish system you can imagine.

Corporate dickfights over revenues while the city dies.

Wonderful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
17. They're Outsource 911 Calls Here...
I heard from a person who had just lost her job at a local 911 Call Center where she had worked for the last 15 year. She did the night shift, working with Police, Fire and Emergency Services for 8 nearby communities. She was told that budget cuts meant the communities could no longer maintain the center and would be using a new company located 50 miles away in Chicago. She was outraged at what the consequences could be as that Chicago center has no clue about these areas and by the time they do a Mapquest or try to figure out if it was Park Forest or Forest Park, people will die.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stellabella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
19. That is a HUGE mistake.
Private guards do NOT get the training police do. That is NOT 'improving public safety'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TreasonousBastard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-20-09 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
24. For years Wackenhut provided...
police services to small towns that couldn't afford a PD and didn't have laws prohibiting it. I'm not really sure if there were any major problems.

There is that problem of accountability, however, although it's arguable whether controlling a private company is more difficult than a police department.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BreweryYardRat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 06:51 AM
Response to Original message
26. This couldn't possibly go wrong...
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 07:00 AM
Response to Original message
27. Yeah, they think that they'll be saving money,
Until that multi-million dollar lawsuit kicks their budgetary ass, year in, year out for a few years. Then we'll see just how "cheap" those private firms are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dorkulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-21-09 07:06 AM
Response to Original message
28. Nothing could possibli go wrong.
:wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 02:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC