Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

RUMMY'S Denials Were "FULL OF IT"-Newly Declassified Report: Bush Officials Approved Torture (NYT)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-22-09 07:06 AM
Original message
RUMMY'S Denials Were "FULL OF IT"-Newly Declassified Report: Bush Officials Approved Torture (NYT)
Edited on Wed Apr-22-09 07:18 AM by kpete
Newly Declassified Report: Bush Officials Approved Torture
By Jeralyn, Section Terror Detainees

The CIA wasn't the only agency involved in torture of detainees. A newly declassified report by the Senate Armed Services Committee shows that high level Bush officials approved the brutal interrogation techniques used by the military at overseas prisons. So now there's confirmation that the military, not just the CIA were involved, and that Rumsfeld's denials were full of it.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/22/us/politics/22report.html?_r=1&partner=rss&emc=rss

The Senate report documented how some of the techniques used by the military at prisons in Afghanistan and at the naval base in Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, as well as in Iraq — stripping detainees, placing them in “stress positions” or depriving them of sleep — originated in a military program known as Survival Evasion Resistance and Escape, or SERE, intended to train American troops to resist abusive enemy interrogations.


According to the Senate investigation, a military behavioral scientist and a colleague who had witnessed SERE training proposed its use at Guantánamo in October 2002, as pressure was rising “to get ‘tougher’ with detainee interrogations.” Officers there sought authorization, and Mr. Rumsfeld approved 15 interrogation techniques.

The report showed that Mr. Rumsfeld’s authorization was cited by a United States military special-operations lawyer in Afghanistan as “an analogy and basis for use of these techniques,” and that, in February 2003, a special-operations unit in Iraq obtained a copy of the policy from Afghanistan “that included aggressive techniques, changed the letterhead, and adopted the policy verbatim.”


From there it spread to Abu Ghraib where Lt. Gen. Ricardo Sanchez approved the techniques.

more at:
http://www.talkleft.com/story/2009/4/22/201/92298
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Postman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-22-09 07:08 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yeah but Lindy England is in jail so the torture issue is moot....
it's all the little peoples' fault.

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-22-09 07:21 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Yes, I'd like to see the memos where Rummy says he's put out the fire by blaming the little guys
Note that I am not saying the Lindy and her boyfriend were innocent.

I just have this strong feeling that the good old boys arranged the firewall and gave thanks for the shifting of blame. I suspect they metaphorically patted each other on the back and that there are memos to that effect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-22-09 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. Lindy England is still in jail? - Rummy; "just a couple of bad apples?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sanity Claws Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-22-09 07:14 AM
Response to Original message
2. Another example of how the Bush Admin hated the troops
Bush and his cohorts had full knowledge of how and why the low level troops were engaged in the abuses yet they blamed the abuse on "a few bad apples."
Bush, Rumsfeld, et al are the few bad apples.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-22-09 07:16 AM
Response to Original message
3. Where IS Rummy these days, anyway...
He's keeping a damn low profile

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wetzelbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-22-09 07:21 AM
Response to Original message
4. You read my mind
I was just thinking about this exact topic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyLib2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-22-09 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
6. Rec., to keep part of the focus on Rumsfeld.

He was portrayed in the first years as outmaneuvering others and being highly persuasive with Cheney/Bush. While we are pointing fingers--"Remember Rummy."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mnemosyne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-22-09 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
7. War criminals. knr n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC