somewhere
Bush Details 2002 Plot to Attack L.A. Tower
Intelligence Officials Play Down Importance of Case, Attribute Remarks to Politics
By Peter Baker and Dan Eggen
Washington Post Staff Writers
Friday, February 10, 2006; A04
President Bush, under pressure from Congress, defended his campaign against terrorism yesterday, offering for the first time a vivid account of a foiled al Qaeda plotto strike the United States after Sept. 11, 2001, by crashing a hijacked commercial airliner into a Los Angeles skyscraper. Bush said four Southeast Asians who met with Osama bin Laden in Afghanistan in October 2001 were taught how to use shoe bombs to blow open a cockpit door and steer a plane into the Library Tower, the tallest building on the West Coast. The four were captured by Asian authorities before they could execute the plan, he said ... But several U.S. intelligence officials played down the relative importance of the alleged plot and attributed the timing of Bush's speech to politics. The officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they did not want to publicly criticize the White House, said there is deep disagreement within the intelligence community over the seriousness of the Library Tower scheme and whether it was ever much more than talk ... The officials said four Asian countries were involved but would not identify them ...
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/25/AR2006092500402_pf.htmlVolume 53, Number 5 · March 23, 2006
Are We Safer? An Epilogue
By David Cole
On Thursday, February 9, shortly after my article "Are We Safer?" <NYR, March 9> went to press, and as criticism of his National Security Agency spying program mounted within his own party, President Bush delivered a speech to the National Guard Association in Washington, D.C., that offered new details about a foiled al-Qaeda plot aimed at flying an airplane into the Library Tower, a skyscraper in Los Angeles. President Bush presented the details as an illustration that the "war on terror" has been successful in keeping us safe. He did not explain why new details about a four-year-old plot were being made public now, but they appeared to be part of a concerted effort to dampen the increasing criticism of the NSA spying program. (The next day, CIA Director Porter Goss published an Op-Ed article in The New York Times making broad claims about how "leaks" about government initiatives in the war on terrorism—presumably including the one that disclosed the existence of the NSA spying program—had endangered American lives.)
The President's assertions about the Library Tower plot again underscore the need for close scrutiny in assessing the administration's claims. The President described a plan in 2002 to use shoe bombs to break down the cockpit door, overpower the pilots, and then fly the hijacked plane into the tower. The alleged planners, described only as Southeast Asians, were captured in early 2002 in Asia.
As far as we know, no one has been charged, much less convicted, of any crime in connection with the alleged plot. Intelligence officials told The Washington Post that there was "deep disagreement within the intelligence community over... whether it was ever much more than talk." A senior FBI official said that "to take that and make it into a disrupted plot is just ludicrous." Bruce Hoffman, a terrorism expert at the RAND Corporation, said of Bush's latest account: "It doesn't really give us any more indication of whether this was a plot that was derailed or preempted, or a plot that was more in the realm of an idle daydream."
The Los Angeles Times reported that when the plot was first publicly disclosed, authorities "said that, at best, the alleged plot was something that had been discussed but never put into action."
Moreover, while US officials reportedly learned about some of the plot's details by interrogating captured al-Qaeda leader Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, he was captured in 2003, long after the planners had been arrested. As the Los Angeles Times put it, "By the time anybody knew about it, the threat — if there had been one — had passed, federal counter-terrorism officials said" ...
http://www.nybooks.com/articles/18810