Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama DOJ Seeks to Restrict Defendant's Right to Lawyer During Questioning

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-23-09 09:46 PM
Original message
Obama DOJ Seeks to Restrict Defendant's Right to Lawyer During Questioning


http://www.talkleft.com/story/2009/4/23/221528/555
Obama DOJ Seeks to Restrict Defendant's Right to Lawyer During Questioning
By Jeralyn, Section Crime Policy
Posted on Thu Apr 23, 2009 at 09:15:28 PM EST

More true colors?

The Justice Department is asking the Supreme Court to overrule Michigan v. Jackson, the 1986 Supreme Court decision that held that if police may not interrogate a defendant after the right to counsel has attached, if the defendant has a lawyer or has requested a lawyer.

he protection offered by the court in Stevens' 1986 opinion is especially important for vulnerable defendants, including the mentally and developmentally disabled, addicts, juveniles and the poor,

This isn't the first time the Justice Department, under President Obama, has sought to limit defendants' rights.


Since taking office, Obama has drawn criticism for backing the continued imprisonment of enemy combatants in Afghanistan without trial, invoking the "state secrets" privilege to avoid releasing information in lawsuits and limiting the rights of prisoners to test genetic evidence used to convict them.

The idea of overruling the decision originated with Justice Alito during oral arguments in the case of Jesse Montejo, a Louisiana death row inmate. Even some prominent former prosecutors and judges are not on board with changing the rule:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-23-09 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. that's fucked up...
Odd that Obama authored the law requiring cameras in all interrogation rooms, and was a civil rights attorney. Is this an argument limited to this particular case?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
natrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-23-09 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. just getting ready for mass civil unrest and 50% unemployment, that's change you can believe in
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-23-09 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. 94 days and counting. The Cheney/Bush cabal had EIGHT YEARS to load DOJ and the Judiciary ...
Edited on Thu Apr-23-09 10:16 PM by TahitiNut
... with fascists and corporatists. Furthermore, they had EIGHT YEARS even before that in which to prepare -- and with right-wing millionaires funding the 'government in exile.' The DOJ is loaded at least 5 deep with Federalist Society members and their ilk. It'll take time to change the crew and turn that ship around. The GOPhers in the Senate will be dragging their oars (hoars? whores?) every second and blocking every change they can.

Hell, Holder doesn't even have his first tier filled out yet.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigBearJohn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-24-09 03:50 AM
Response to Original message
4. WTF?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC