Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did we torture Timothy McVeigh or Eric Rudolph?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ck4829 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-24-09 11:35 AM
Original message
Did we torture Timothy McVeigh or Eric Rudolph?
And why does it become necessary to torture once the terrorists are no longer ultra-right wing white Christian guys?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-24-09 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. good question n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-24-09 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
2. Yes, this is an EXCELLENT question.
And it's one I'd like to see one of the Repub shills answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bolo Boffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-24-09 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Especially in light of the recent right-wing terrorism report
Wasn't it irresponsible of the government not to torture McVeigh to make sure he didn't know about other plots against government buildings?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kid a Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-24-09 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
3. How about Terry Nichols?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bolo Boffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-24-09 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Still available. Maybe we can pencil in a waterboarding on Monday?
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yodermon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-24-09 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
4. rw response: "The should have!!1! Clinton was president and didn't; so he's a terrorist appeaser"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-24-09 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I'm unsure of this exactly, but didn't that "terror" attack yield legislation...
...that later benefited the whole phony "war on terror," and Patriot Act legislation? I know I've read that in various conspiracy/deep politics literature, although I'd have to go Google for it to be certain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-24-09 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
5. But but but
they're WHITE and "CHRISTIAN", not brown and Muslim. Whites are always honest, truthful, and "good" doncha know. And those other people who worship God but use Arabic to say His name are, of course, "bad".

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 04:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC