Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Today's unintenional humor brought to you by the Family Research Council and David Vitter

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ck4829 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-24-09 02:42 PM
Original message
Today's unintenional humor brought to you by the Family Research Council and David Vitter
Edited on Fri Apr-24-09 02:42 PM by ck4829
Over the last few months, Right Wing Watch wrote a handful of posts about how Sen. David Vitter was hard at work sealing off his right flank in an attempt to shut down any potential primary challenge he might face because of his past involvement with a prostitution ring.

Among those who considered mounting such a challenge was Tony Perkins of the Family Research Council, who toyed with the idea for a while before announcing that he would not seek to unseat Vitter.

With that awkward unpleasantness behind them, Perkins can now focus on helping Vitter restore his reputation among the Religious Right, which he started doing last week by inviting Vitter onto his Washington Watch Weekly radio program to discuss ... wait for it ... HHS nominee Kathleen Sebelius's supposed "ethical problems":

On this week's edition of Washington Watch Weekly: The nomination of Governor Kathleen Sebelius for Secretary of Health and Human Services as head of the largest cabinet department should be troubling not only to pro-life Americans but to every American who cares about integrity and accountability within government. Senator David Vitter joins me to discuss her ethical problems and actions you can take to stop her nomination.


That's right - Perkins and FRC invited David Vitter on to discuss "ethical problems" ... not his, mind you, but Sebelius's.

The discussion itself was not really all that interesting, with the exception of Perkins' introduction to the segment:

Is someone whose integrity is clearly in question fit to guarantee the integrity of the largest, and some would say the most important, domestic agency of the federal government? Well, Senator David Vitter of Louisiana joins me after the break (to discuss this question).


No, your eyes are not playing tricks on you; the Tony Perkins of the Family Research Council really did have David Vitter on to discuss the supposed "ethical problems" of someone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-24-09 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. "...sealing off his right flank ..."
Was he changing his own diaper this time?
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-24-09 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. It's a magical moment! I love this! We should all write Tony a sweet letter
about how wonderful it is that he should have someone on his show that would really like to legalize prostitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-24-09 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. Be sure to vote in the "religious free speech poll" on this page at FRC:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-25-09 04:52 AM
Response to Original message
4. kick for Diaper Dave.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC