Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Monsanto suing Germany: corporate interests vs public will?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
azul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-25-09 12:33 PM
Original message
Monsanto suing Germany: corporate interests vs public will?
I am no lawyer, but I think that this story is at the heart of the world's woes. Businesses have way too much influence in critical decisions on the direction of human activities. Corporate "persons" have been given a legal seat somehow by courts and laws, and they have spent their influence monies to dominate the world's economy at resource spending.

Can Germany, or any other country for that matter, resign from trade agreements or rules, when it believes it proper, and just ban monsanto from dealing in the country? I know that this case is an EU rules one, but the multinational corporations seem to have more say in international law than do the national citizens. I think that this situation makes many people feel helpless and get mad and violent.

___________________



FRANKFURT, April 21 (Reuters) - Monsanto Co (MON.N), the world's biggest seed company, has filed suit against the German government's decision to ban genetically modified (GMO) maize, the company said on Tuesday.

The German government banned the cultivation and sale of GMO maize despite European Union rulings that the biotech grain is safe.

The ban affects Monsanto's MON 810 maize, which may no longer be sown for this summer's harvest, the government said.

A Monsanto spokesman said Germany's action to restrict Mon 810 was an "arbitrary ban" that violated EU rules.

He said EU member states can invoke a safeguard clause against an already approved plant but such a move required new scientific evidence and none existed to support the ban.


http://www.reuters.com/article/marketsNews/idUSLL62523620090421

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
angstlessk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-25-09 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think new evidence lays in the graves of all the thousands of Indian
farmers who have taken their lives because of Monsanto practices?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC