Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

EMPLOYEE FREE CHOICE IS DEAD…conservative Democrats killed it!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-25-09 03:35 PM
Original message
EMPLOYEE FREE CHOICE IS DEAD…conservative Democrats killed it!

http://gangbox.wordpress.com/2009/04/25/employee-free-choice-is-deadconservative-democrats-killed-it/

Posted in Uncategorized by gangbox on the April 25, 2009

Some Democrats only care about labor’s money.

*
By THOMAS FRANK

Columnist's name

It has been three hard months of political exile for those on the right, a time for them to count their grievances and dress their outrage in the trappings of centuries past. Some have donned colonial outfits to stage tea parties. Others have found the 1860s more to their taste, reviving the fiery language of secession fever.

But they can all take heart from one development in the nation’s capital. Good old K Street, where the big tea party never stopped, has all but halted organized labor’s effort to make it easier for workers to unionize.

After massive lobbying both by labor and by business, it appears that the Employee Free Choice Act (EFCA), which, as it now stands, would allow workers to organize in many cases merely by signing cards instead of holding elections, will not have the 60 votes required to get past a Republican filibuster in the Senate.

Now, to be pro-labor is to resign yourself to years of failures and defeats, with few tea parties along the way for consolation. Even so, the setback on EFCA has to be a bitter one. Union members worked hard to elect Barack Obama and the Democratic Congress, as they did to put Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton in the White House. And now, just as in those previous two periods of Democratic governance, labor’s friends are having trouble enacting basic labor-law reforms.

To understand why we need new rules governing unionization, look no further than yesterday’s New York Times, where Steven Greenhouse told the story of a Louisville, Ky., hospital whose nurses tried to form a union but failed after they were reportedly threatened with losing their benefits among other things.

Such practices are commonplace and well-documented by Human Rights Watch and others. But labor’s case never seemed to hit home. Instead, conservatives have carried the day, playing on lurid stereotypes to hint that intimidation by unions is the real worry and that EFCA spells the end of secret ballots in the workplace and hence of democracy itself.

Before I go on, I should acknowledge that this whole thing might be a clever bit of jiu-jitsu by the unions. After all, the mere threat of EFCA has turned business almost Soviet in its feigned concern for the proletariat. The Chamber of Commerce is now exhorting the public to “stand up for workers’ rights,” running a “workforce freedom airlift,” and, along with other trade associations, supporting groups with names like “Coalition for a Democratic Workplace” and “Workforce Fairness Institute.”

FULL story at link.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ananda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-25-09 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. Truly sad.
This country is so fucked.

As if the back of labor wasn't already
broken anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CANDO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-25-09 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. I'm a 20 year Teamster and there is major trouble in my near future.
The next time you're out and about, watch for trucks with the names Roadway, Yellow, Holland, New Penn, or Reddaway. They are soon to be gone because of corporate greed and plain old failed business decisions. Those companies are all under the same corporate ownership. There are 40,000 Teamsters among the employees of those companies and we are soon to go bankrupt. Our corporate captains have managed to saddle us with 1.3 billion dollars of debt that they can't service. We've already given a 10% wage concession for the life of our new five year contract. Now they are asking for a deferral of pension payments. Same old story...company makes decisions that back fire, and then the employees are looked upon as the way to make up for it. So yeah, we're fucked. And once again the Democrats have fucked labor. I can't tell you how many times I've had union brothers tell me they used to trust Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-25-09 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. I don't believe it is dead. But what the hell, my opinion is shit anyway.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-25-09 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. yes, parts of the party have an adversarial relationship
with labor and other "special interest" groups. But we knew that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-25-09 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
4. No, no, no, no, no - don't give up ---


http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x3847757

Biden is very pro-union and with the help of Mary Beth Maxwell, you can rest assured that there will be a big fight for this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Touchdown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-25-09 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. It's all for nought unless Reid tells the Repugs to grab a piss bucket
get the phone book out and filibuster until they collapse. So far with anything else, he's just let them threaten it. I don't see Reid changing his MO any time soon, not for this. It's too important to working people for it to be important to him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Touchdown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-25-09 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
5. The turncoats are
Edited on Sat Apr-25-09 05:07 PM by Touchdown
Pryor D, Ar
Lincoln D, Ar
Landreau D, La
Specter R, Pa
Carper D De
Feinstein D Ca

All of which bought into the "secret ballot" bullshit from the USCofC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-25-09 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. gee, those names are familiar from somewhere...
:grrr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laelth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-26-09 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
9. Make them filibuster. It only takes 51 votes to pass a measure in the Senate.
60 is not required, ever. Make them filibuster.

:dem:

-Laelth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishwax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-26-09 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I agree -- if they're going to stand against the workers, make them do so prominently
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-26-09 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
11. What difference does it make? There aren't any jobs
sorta kinda :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC