Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Will Gay Marriage Pit Church Against Church? - Time

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-26-09 11:52 AM
Original message
Will Gay Marriage Pit Church Against Church? - Time
Sunday, Apr. 26, 2009
Will Gay Marriage Pit Church Against Church?
By Michael A. Lindenberger

<snip>

The fight over gay marriage may be far from over, but already some conservative Christian leaders are looking beyond the courtroom dramas and the legislative infighting. The trouble they see is not just an America where general support for gay marriage will have driven a wedge between churches and the world, but between churches themselves.

"More than anything else, these developments may signal the fact that those who, on biblical grounds, are led by conscience to reject same-sex marriage, really will be exposed as a moral minority," the Rev. Albert Mohler, president of the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary and a staunch defender of traditional definition of marriage, told TIME recently. "If so, it will expose a great divide over the authority of the Bible among many Christian churches and denominations perhaps in a way exceeding any other issue." (Check out the story "What If You're on the Gay 'Enemies List.'")

Ever since Jesus told followers to "render unto Caesar what is Caesar's," preachers have been warning about a clash between "the world" and "the church." But now Mohler is predicting something more, a clash between churches themselves. (Most recently, the Anglican Communion has been paralyzed by debate over the consecration of gay bishops.) Writing on Thursday morning in his personal blog, Mohler laid out his thoughts more clearly still. "No issue defines our current cultural crisis as clearly as homosexuality. Some churches and denominations have capitulated to the demands of the homosexual rights movement, and now accept homosexuality as a fully valid lifestyle," he wrote. "Other denominations are tottering on the brink, and without a massive conservative resistance, they are almost certain to abandon biblical truth and bless what the Bible condemns. Within a few short years, a major dividing line has become evident with those churches endorsing homosexuality on one side, and those stubbornly resisting the cultural tide on the other." (Read the story "A Gay Marriage Solution: End Marriage?")

Mohler's view is, to a certain extent, shared by Joseph E. Kurtz, Archbishop of Louisville, who leads an ad hoc panel of U.S. Catholic bishops set up to fight gay marriage. He too sees a potential future when a greater acceptance of homosexuality leads to pressure on churches to conform, and even to change their teachings. "There are grave threats that decisions by the courts, legislative actions or regulations could erode religious freedom," Kurtz tells TIME. "With regard to marriage, this implicates the right of Catholics to practice our beliefs. Here we are talking about the bedrock of society, it's not just a belief, it's written on the hearts of every human person."

Unlike the Baptist's stark outlook, however, Kurtz is more optimistic that the fight to preserve a traditional definition of marriage is not doomed and is actively forming alliances and organizing to shore up the one-man-and-one-woman concept of matrimony. He sent a letter last fall to Thomas Monson, president of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, praising Mormon support for Prop 8, the ballot-initiative in California that made gay marriage unconstitutional. That state's Supreme Court is expected to rule on the validity of the amendment soon.

Kurtz concedes there have been wins for supporters of gay marriage lately, but last November's statewide votes against gay marriage in California, Arizona and Florida buoyed him. "It's hard for any of us to have a crystal ball to know our culture society will move," says Kurtz. "The Catholic Church will certainly respond with a commitment to truth and love. ... November is not all that long ago, and I still believe that getting out the message about marriage, with a commitment to both truth and love, will succeed. In upholding the traditional definition of marriage, there is not a desire to punish or hurt anyone. We want to do a better job of communicating our concern for all, for both those who agree, and disagree."

Mohler sees the true church as a body comprised of believers who refuse to give ground on gay marriage. So does the Catholic Church, which has shown no willingness to change its own teachings, rooted as they often are in centuries of tradition. But, except for the November referendums, solidarity among fellow-thinkers has not borne much fruit. And a recent swarm of dire ads warning of a "gathering storm" of gay rights mostly backfired. "Those advocates want to change the way I think," a woman says in one of the most-viewed commercials. Another adds, "I will have no choice." And another warns that she will soon be faced with a choice between "my job and my faith." The ads prompted hundreds of thousands of views on Youtube.com, but they mainly served to show how far removed their creators were from the zeitgeist. The Colbert Report mocked the ads, and countless parodies have sprung up across the Internet at the expense of the ads' grave-faced actors.

So while both men are calling for courage and compassion among their flocks, it's not clear yet whether their message that homosexuals are sinners by definition is resonating beyond their staunchest supporters. Of course, that may be just fine with both men, who see in the future a kind of purifying ordeal that will sort out the true church from the others.

<snip>

Link: http://www.time.com/time/printout/0,8816,1893955,00.html#

("There are grave threats that decisions by the courts, legislative actions or regulations could erode religious freedom," Kurtz tells TIME. "With regard to marriage, this implicates the right of Catholics to practice our beliefs..." )


NO Archbishop Kurtz !!!

It does NOT erode religious freedoms, nor does it implicate your right to believe any silly-assed thing you or I choose to believe.

It DOES seek to enjoin you from foisting your bigoted beliefs upon those who do NOT believe the same as you, or on to anybody else for that matter.

:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-26-09 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. And then the "true" churches can go to battle agains the heretical churches.
Wheeee! We can have the Thirty Years War all over again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-26-09 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. Gay rights have already made clear opposing views among churches. . .but,
they already had been common -- i.e., orthodox vs non-orthodox --

Married priests still existed in some Churches vs Catholic Catholic ban, etal --

Organized patriarchal religions have long sought to impose their beliefs on society --

and in regard to intolerance and disrespect for women and homosexuals, they've largely

succeeded.

We need to laugh at religion more --

and the very structure of organized patriarchal religion which underpins patriarchy!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-26-09 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
3. Dividing the church? As if. As if there aren't already deep, deep
differences between the churches driven by bigotry and those who aren't? As if, say, my Episcopal church were suddenly going to go along with Mohler's biblical literalism? Dream on, dude. Unless you start opening your eyes to the nasty strain of hatred and bigotry you are fomenting, these divisions lay on your own head.

I hate the continued use of "lifestyle choice" as if gay people simply decided one day to piss their pastors off by "becoming" gay. And the idea that churches which have seen the light are of course described by him as caving in to insidious special interests. He should know all about those.

No one's religious freedom is threatened by finally acknowledging the rights that gay and lesbian people already have, by virtue of being human beings. No one will be forced to perform a marriage ceremony they don't want to perform. No church will be forced to change its theology - except perhaps from within, which is fine and proper, as the church IS its people, not its leadership. (Something the RCC ought to be reminded of, and often).

This is such nasty hateful tripe, all wrapped up in pious clothing. It makes me see red.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-26-09 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
4. These churches, all of them that oppose marriage equality, will adapt eventually...
or risk losing what little funding they have when younger members of society(the under 30 set) start replacing the older members in their churches. These young people by about a 2/3rds majority, support marriage equality, frankly most of them are puzzled by the opposition, from either their churches or from politicians.

The bigots and the churches who support them are still winning battles today, but ultimately, they are losing the war, and I think they know it, but don't know what to do. Simply put, its an adapt or die situation, and it won't be imposed by some type of government repression, but by societal pressure.

Churches have adapted to such changes before, and they will have to adapt again, or they risk being made irrelevant in society.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Sep 25th 2020, 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC