Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CIA And The Washington Post: Joined At The Hip

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-28-09 12:42 AM
Original message
CIA And The Washington Post: Joined At The Hip
Edited on Tue Apr-28-09 12:45 AM by Hissyspit
http://pubrecord.org/commentary/867-cia-and-the-washington-post-joined-at-the-hip.html

CIA And The Washington Post: Joined At The Hip
Written by Melvin A. Goodman
Monday, 27 April 2009 00:00
By Melvin A. Goodman

Under the stewardship of Fred Hiatt, the editorial and op-ed pages of the Washington Post have gradually moved to the right. Post editorials and op-eds have defended the decision to go to war in Iraq; opposed any improvement in bilateral relations with Russia; refused to acknowledge Israel’s misuse of military power in the Middle East; and lobbied against the need for investigation of the detention and interrogation programs of the Bush administration.

As part of the campaign to prevent a rigorous examination of “enhanced interrogation techniques” (read: “torture and abuse”), the Washington Post's editorial pages have been particularly protective of the Central Intelligence Agency and its senior leaders--the ideological drivers for torture and extraordinary renditions policies. These CIA leaders, particularly deputy director Steven Kappes and acting general counsel John Rizzo, are not trying to protect the reputation and mission of the CIA; they are trying to protect themselves.

Surely senior journalists from the mainstream media must understand that reliance on anonymous CIA clandestine sources is neither good reporting nor professional journalism. Many of these “anonymous sources” almost certainly are former and current CIA officials seeking to protect themselves. George Tenet, John McLaughlin, and John Brennan are individuals who fit that description.

In the past several days, the Post has carried editorials and op-eds by its own editorial writer David Ignatius; its longtime national security writer Walter Pincus; former CIA director Porter Goss; former CIA operative Michael Scheuer; and Marc Thiessen, a former chief speechwriter for President George W. Bush. These articles have been similar in content and similar to the statements of other CIA directors past and present (Leon Panetta, Michael Hayden, Goss, Tenet, and John Deutch) who opposed the release of the memoranda of the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel that justified the use of torture and abuse.

The Scheuer article is particularly scurrilous, accusing President Obama of self-righteousness and intellectual arrogance” in deciding to release the torture memos. Scheuer believes that an end to torture will lead to future terrorist attacks that could involve the “loss of major cities and tens of thousands of countrymen,” and that the president will bear some responsibility. Scheuer, an aggressive proponent of torture and abuse, was the leader of the CIA’s Osama bin Laden unit in the 1990s. His behavior at CIA was so bizarre that he was eventually quarantined by the Agency, spending the last few years of his employment in the Agency’s library without access to classified documents.

These Post articles also reflect the opinion of key members of the CIA’s National Clandestine Service and Office of the General Counsel, who want to cover up CIA war crimes and prevent any authoritative investigation of the CIA’s creation, operation, and maintenance of its detention and interrogation programs. The CIA took a similar stance in trying to block investigations of such intelligence failures as the inability to track the decline of the Soviet Union in the 1980s; the 9/11 intelligence failure in 2001; and the provision of specious intelligence to the White House and the Congress of the United States in the run-up to the war with Iraq in 2003.

MORE

Melvin A. Goodman, a regular contributor to The Public Record, is senior fellow at the Center for International Policy and adjunct professor of government at Johns Hopkins University. He spent more than 42 years in the U.S. Army, the Central Intelligence Agency, and the Department of Defense. His most recent book is “Failure of Intelligence: The Decline and Fall of the CIA.”

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-28-09 12:50 AM
Response to Original message
1. Oh my. Scheuer? No kidding? And some people believe this.
The Scheuer article is particularly scurrilous, accusing President Obama of self-righteousness and intellectual arrogance” in deciding to release the torture memos. Scheuer believes that an end to torture will lead to future terrorist attacks that could involve the “loss of major cities and tens of thousands of countrymen,” and that the president will bear some responsibility. Scheuer, an aggressive proponent of torture and abuse, was the leader of the CIA’s Osama bin Laden unit in the 1990s. His behavior at CIA was so bizarre that he was eventually quarantined by the Agency, spending the last few years of his employment in the Agency’s library without access to classified documents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moodforaday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-28-09 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Scheuer is a psychopath
Depending on what interview with Scheuer you hear, or what part of an interview, you could think him a reasonable guy who just wanted to get Bin Laden. On occasion he criticized Bush for the Iraq war, but when you listened closely, it was only because he though Bush was doing it wrong. He doesn't just love torture; he thinks it's OK to killl people indiscriminately, as long as he thinks there may be terra-ists close by.

About a week ago I saw a brief interview with him on Al Jazeera English. Can't quote him verbatim, but basically he said we shouldn't torture people because we shouldn't even detain them in the first place. "At this point we should just kill them where we find them" - if not his exact words, it's pretty close.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democracyinkind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-28-09 04:22 AM
Response to Original message
2. That reminds me of the thesis presented in Katharine the Great :

..... Katharine the Great : Katharine Graham and Her Washington Post Empire
by Deborah Davis.

I think they're scoundrels.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unc70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-28-09 08:19 AM
Response to Original message
3. Post always close with intelligence agencies and with banking
There are lots of personal ties among the players, many running through Yale. Goss and Negroponte and W.H.T Bush were frat brothers at Yale. When Goss left the CIA, he was elected to a town council seat. Gov. Graham appointed him to fill an empty county commissioner seat, giving him a political kick start. In a few years, you find Sen. Graham (D-FL)and Rep. Goss (R-FL) as Chair/Ranking Member of the intelligence oversight committees no matter which party would be in majority.

Yes, that Bob Graham whose brother Philip became publisher of the Post following his marriage to Katherine, daughter of its owner Eugene Meyer (also head of Federal Reserve and first president of the World Bank). Eugene Meyer and Philip Graham were early investors pg GHW Bush.

Ben Bradlee came to the Post from intelligence/disinformation work in Europe. His second wife's sister, Mary Pinchot Meyer, was married to Cord Meyer, a CIA agent who just happened to run Operation Mockingbird. They had divorced before Mary Meyer was murdered in 1964. Mary had many affairs including one with JFK which she had described in her diary; this is a possible motive for her murder.

The father of the third Mrs. Bradlee's (Sally Quinn) was a senior OSS/CIA officer. And a lot more, most of it discussed here at DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-28-09 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
4. Wasn't called Spook Central for nothing....
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-28-09 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
5. known m.o. of the cia to recruit in business and journalism.
no surprise here, nor should it be a surprise at any other "news" outlet or corporation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-28-09 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
6. K & R for wider reading. All DUers should know about Operation Mockingbird
and its descendants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-28-09 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Yep, not just one newspaper, or one pundit, or one TV network in the mix
Edited on Tue Apr-28-09 04:37 PM by Supersedeas
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unc70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-28-09 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Also Operations: Northwoods, Mongoose, Gladio, Condor, et al
I recently was re-reading various discussions about Gladio and its cohorts, when I realized how many of the lunatic CTs -- those to wild for even me -- have now been confirmed.

If you are new to DU, try searching on those terms at DU and on the Net. After an hour or two, you realize that they are all related with the same families, the same talking points, the same control of banking, media, munitions, and governments.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happydreams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-28-09 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
7. THIESSEN!!!......MARC THYSSEN???.....
Edited on Tue Apr-28-09 03:32 PM by happydreams
This is just toooooo coincidental.
Fritz Thyssen, Prescott Bush's business partner, was the primary financier of Hitler!!
This guys family tree needs a look-see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Truth2Tell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-28-09 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
11. No. Really?
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 12:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC