Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Arlen Specter....."Magic Bullet Specter".......

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Mind_your_head Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-28-09 11:31 PM
Original message
Arlen Specter....."Magic Bullet Specter".......
I don't *believe* anything from this man after that "GREAT BIG LIE" some 46 years ago......

sorry, I just can't/won't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-28-09 11:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. A long memory is a handicap in politics.
Me, I don't forgive the Thomas/Hill hearings.

"Specter began by assuring me that he was simply trying 'to find out what happened.' Nevertheless, in short order, any hope that Senator Specter would transcend the political was dashed. He began his questioning with an unmistakably prosecutorial tone. He used a familiar cross-examination tactic--a tactic common in sexual harassment cases. He ridiculed my reaction to Thomas' behavior, suggesting that I was being oversensitive, even to the point of misrepresenting my testimony....

The tension between Senator Specter and me was measurable. The process seemed to break down completely. Senator Specter would repeat the same questions until he got the answer he wanted.... To the press and spectators, we must have sounded silly and ill tempered. More than one sigh erupted from the seats behind me as Specter returned to the questioning and I once more gave my explanation. Clearly, neither of us would budge from our position.

Something in the back of my head said, 'Just say what he wants you say and get on with it.' But I was much too stubborn to do that. And the more he pursued it, the more inclined I was to resist. Digging in was, perhaps, for me one way of hanging on to some amount of my dignity. By now I knew that his questions were both insincere and ill informed. Though I tried to answer him, I was equally determined that the senator not put words in my mouth.

With every question he asked, it became clearer that despite any declaration to the contrary, he viewed me as an adversary. Rather than seeking to elicit information, his questioning sought to elicit a conclusion that he had reached before the hearing began."

<http://www.geocities.com/zrrifle99/>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-29-09 12:32 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. It was definitely one of his lowest moments. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-28-09 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. Without getting into the whole debate, most ballistics experts and computer mockups
have also arrived at the same conclusion about the bullet. With the Zapruder evidence it becomes very clear that the bullet wouldn't have had to zigzag or do anything magical to cause exactly the wounds created if it were fired from the SBD window.

Not saying that means the shots came from there--just don't want to get into it--but the argument that the Warren Commission required a "Magic Bullet" is completely disproved by science now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stopbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-29-09 12:02 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Agreed. It would have been magic had that bullet not hit Connally after exiting JFK.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patriotvoice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-29-09 03:12 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Please, call us simulations.
We're easily offended by being labeled as merely static "mockups."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-29-09 05:23 AM
Response to Original message
6. his voting record is enough evidence for me ...
don't mind what he says he will do, mind what he actually does when the time comes to put his money where his mouth is ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC