Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

AG Holder: US could cooperate with a foreign court's investigation of Bush administration officials

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-29-09 02:34 PM
Original message
AG Holder: US could cooperate with a foreign court's investigation of Bush administration officials

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/30477302/

<snip>

In speaking to reporters Wednesday, Holder also said it is possible the United States could cooperate with a foreign court's investigation of Bush administration officials.

Holder spoke before the announcement that a Spanish magistrate had opened an investigation of Bush officials on harsh interrogation methods. Holder didn't rule out cooperating in such a probe.

"Obviously, we would look at any request that would come from a court in any country and see how and whether we should comply with it," Holder said.

"This is an administration that is determined to conduct itself by the rule of law and to the extent that we receive lawful requests from an appropriately created court, we would obviously respond to it," he said.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-29-09 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. Whoa. I hope the whole rotten cabal reads this. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-29-09 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. It's not up to Holder, though, it's a State Department matter
It will be interesting to see how Mrs Clinton handles it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-29-09 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. the SoS would be the go-between but the actual documents/evidence would come from Justice
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-29-09 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Agreed. That's the point
SoS may decide to block those documents based on diplomatic considerations, and Holder cannot deliver them otherwise.

I'm not saying it won't happen, I'm just saying Holder's assurance exceeded his authority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-29-09 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. That would be the best solution. It would remove the issue
of partisan politics and insure that an objective tribunal reviewed all the evidence. The Bush administration will, of course, scream state secrets to the high heavens. But, they should have thought about protecting state secrets before they authorized torture because inquiries into violations of international law are not going to be limited by the privileges established by American law. The rules are different.

I don't think on the other hand that we should become complacent. We must pressure the international public opinion to make sure the torture is thoroughly investigated, that the relevant evidence is made public and that appropriate charges are brought and sentences issued. The same should apply to any other government or group that tortures whether it is Al Qaeda or Syria or Egypt or whatever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-29-09 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
4. kick and nominate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-29-09 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
5. Spanish Judge has decided to investigate another Guantanamo torture claim...
Edited on Wed Apr-29-09 04:03 PM by lunatica
This is in today's news. It's the same judge who ordered the arrest of Pinochet in 1998. This case is unrelated to the one they just agreed not to proceed with. Since 2005 Spain has assumed the principle of universal jurisdiction in alleged cases of crimes against humanity, genocide, and terrorism. But it can only proceed if the alleged crimes are not already subject to a legal procedure in the country involved.

Here's another thread with this topic

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x5562234

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneGrassRoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-29-09 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
6. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pleah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-29-09 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
7. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC