Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

FCC Claims Right to Warrantless Searches

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Kali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 12:23 PM
Original message
FCC Claims Right to Warrantless Searches
http://www.allgov.com/ViewNews/FCC_Claims_Right_to_Warrantless_Searches_90525

Monday, May 25, 2009

With the advancement of wireless technology all across America has come an
expanded authority by federal regulators to enter homes without a warrant,
so says the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). Based on the original
law that created it (the Communications Act of 1934), the FCC claims today
the power to search any home or business using any licensed or unlicensed
radio frequency equipment, and that includes things like wireless modems
and garage door openers. This surprising claim of authority came to light
when FCC agents hunted down a 100-watt pirate radio station operating out
of a home in Boulder, CO, and left behind a notice informing the
operators: "Whether you operate an amateur station or any other radio
device, your authorization from the Commission comes with the obligation
to allow inspection."

Fortunately for those behind the Boulder pirate radio, they weren't home
at the time. The same was not true for a man in Corpus Christi, TX, who in
2007 was visited by the FCC for rebroadcasting an AM radio station through
a CB radio in his home. Donald Winton refused the FCC agent to enter his
home, and was fined $7,000 for denying entry (which later was knocked down
to $225 after he proved economic hardship).

Civil liberties advocates vehemently object to the FCC's interpretation of
their warrantless search powers. "It is a major stretch beyond case law to
assert that authority with respect to a private home, which is at the
heart of the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable search and
seizure," Lee Tien of the Electronic Frontier Foundation told Wired. "When
it is a private home and when you are talking about an over-powered Wi-Fi
antennathe idea they could just go in is honestly quite bizarre."

-Noel Brinkerhoff


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC