Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Agriculture Secretary Vilsack's interim directive on roadless national forest areas

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
pnutbutr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 06:51 AM
Original message
Agriculture Secretary Vilsack's interim directive on roadless national forest areas
basically he has halted construction and logging in the areas until more appropriate restrictions on such activity can be implemented. http://www.usda.gov/documents/Inventoried_Roadless_Interim_Directive.pdf :woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 06:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. I thought the Department of Interior had responsibility for the National Forests
Why does USDA have something to do with it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NOW tense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 07:22 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. USDA is responsible for forests
Timber is considered an Agricultural resource and falls under the USDA for management and sustainability. This link is very helpful.
http://www.fs.fed.us/
I don't work for the USDA or the gov.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 07:55 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Interior
National parks, Tribal lands, BLM, Landmarks and historic structures. Oil and gas, The DC mall, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
4. so hard to believe this is the same guy that was our governor.
this is change I can believe in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NOW tense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. I am withholding my praise
till I see something done about food monopolies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnutbutr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. what is a food monopoly
and what does it have to do with building roads and logging in national parks?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NOW tense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. The USDA and Monsanto.
Approximately 95 percent of the soybeans and 75 percent of the corn in the United States are GM.
http://www.monsanto.com/monsanto_today/for_the_record/gm_crops_increase_yields.asp

Monsanto Terminator Technology is a way to make all farmers pay for seed every year. Complete control of the food supply.
http://www.ethicalinvesting.com/monsanto/terminator.shtml

Monsanto at Wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monsanto
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnutbutr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. the fact that
you don't like Monsanto doesn't make them a monopoly. Terminator tech will never go forward. Massive protests by farmers and enviro groups along with an almost guaranteed action by the government to prevent it's use. Most soybeans grown in the US are exported. Most corn grown in the US is not used for human consumption.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NOW tense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. I am not completely against Monsanto
They have some good qualities. What I am against is Monsanto cornering markets. Most corn is indirectly used for human consumption. Don't all of our livestock eat it? There has been talk of using production cost to set milk prices. Wouldn't being the producer of almost all production of feed sources give you a lot of power? Cotton is another product. Sugar Beets is another. My main concern is that, I don't ever want to hear the company that produces a very large portion of agribusiness say, they are too big to fail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC