Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

“We are going to spend the rest of our lives if necessary passing medical care." LBJ

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-07-09 08:33 PM
Original message
“We are going to spend the rest of our lives if necessary passing medical care." LBJ
“Medicare would not have been enacted in 1965 if Lyndon Johnson had not been President.”

“The Medicare Program as a Capstone to the Great Society-Recent Revelations in the LBJ White House Tapes” by Larry DeWitt May 2003


http://www.larrydewitt.net/Essays/MedicareDaddy.htm\

The above document describes how the first Medicare legislation was passed in 1965. It was not easy. Truman advocated a national health insurance program for everyone, but the idea was shot down by Republicans opposed to “red” policies and by the AMA, which objected to government regulation of medicine. Decades later, LBJ worked like a dog in order to win passage of the nation’s first major public health insurance program, one limited to seniors and folks on disability. He shuffled the staff at HEW so that he could get an ardent Medicare supporter, Wilbur Cohen in charge. He applied pressure directly on Congressmen of both parties. He exploited his political capital from the landslide 1965 election and sentimentality about JFK.

The result was the Social Security Act of 1965 which created Medicare Parts A and B (physician and hospital health insurance coverage for the elderly and disabled ) and Medicaid, which covered the nation’s poor. This was intended to be just the first step towards universal health care. Insurance for the nation’s elderly was supposed to be an easy sell (it was not). Once people got used to Medicare, there would be popular calls to expand it to cover everyone.

Forty years later, we still do not have universal coverage. Instead, we have a system that seems designed to discourage disease prevention in the young and encourage health care over utilization in the elderly. The nation’s 50 million uninsured are denied basic care that would keep them healthy. As a result, they are more likely to reach retirement age with severe, debilitating and costly diseases like congestive heart failure and renal insufficiency. Even those with insurance often find that well care is not covered. Since younger people do not have a dedicated health insurance provider, there is little economic incentive to spend money to prevent disease. Private insurance companies stand to make more profit by “cherry picking” healthy people and denying care to anyone who happens to get sick. This means that younger people who develop illness are often unable to get the treatment they need when they need it. Instead, they have to cross their fingers and hope they survive until 65. Or become so ill that they qualify for Medicare disability.

Medical costs associated with end of life care have risen, since universal Medicare coverage for these procedures has encouraged the development of new, expensive (sometimes futile) technology. And after a few decades of medical neglect, our nation’s seniors are ready for lots of overpriced, futile care from their “forget disease prevention, we’ll just pay to fix you up once you break” Medicare system. When you treat your organs and joints as disposable, your health care bills stack up pretty fast. Sort of like buying a new car every year, when proper maintenance on the old one would have kept it running---except that when it comes to the human body, the "new car" is never as good as the one you trashed. The U.S. spends twice as much per person per year to achieve results that would embarrass an Eastern European country. Americans die earlier, they are more likely to die in infancy, they suffer more chronic preventable diseases than their counterparts in other industrialized countries like Japan and France. And their Medicare costs keep rising.

By any parameter---cost, outcome, accessibility---“the best health care system in the world” is broken. Congress’s proposed solution---make everyone buy private insurance—is pretty broken, too. There is only one way to fix what ails us. We must take the next step, the one that Medicare's creators envisioned, the one that Harry Truman worked for almost 60 years ago. We must make Medicare a universal, cradle to grave health insurance program.

If one insurer knows that it will be responsible for Michael’s health care expenses for the rest of his life, that insurer will spend a few hundred dollars to keep his cholesterol down and his blood pressure controlled, so that it does not have to pay hundreds of thousands of dollars later to treat his congestive heart failure. The insurer will have a financial interest in helping Wanda keep her blood sugar under control, since that will save on dialysis costs twenty years from now. There will be an incentive to fund research into disease prevention. Broad public health initiatives aimed at keeping people from getting sick will become more cost effective.

The single insurer does not have to be called “Medicare”, but it must be the same insurer that cover folks of Medicare age. If we allow privates to collect the premiums of young Americans but do not make them responsible for the diseases of later life, the privates will continue to scrimp on preventive services.

I am delighted that Obama has decided to follow in the footsteps of LBJ and seize control of the health care debate. As a nation, we will continue to suffer from chronic diseases at an unacceptably high rate, unless we change our basic health insurance model. If we become healthier, then our health care costs will go down, too, making the single payer option a win-win proposition for almost everyone.

This is going to be a long, nasty fight---as it was back in 1964-5. There is a lot of money at stake, which means that the public is going to be bombarded with misinformation and Congress will be bribed with campaign donations. Even if the executive branch fights for health care reform, it is not guaranteed to pass this year. However, now that the administration has gotten serious about it, I think that there is a much better chance that we will see some progress. And I think (hope) that years from now, someone will write

"National Health Care would not have been enacted in 2009 if Obama had not been president."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ginny from the Block Donating Member (43 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-07-09 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. I wish I could remain so confident in Obama's leadership........
There's no question that public statesmen go out on a limb to pass legislation truly noteworthy. Obama has never firmly committed to a public option in the health care debate, except when he was a state senator and claimed we would get single payer care if we had Dem. controlled White House, Dem. House, & Dem. Senate. Now we have that, and Obama is waffling.

Even the Dem.s in Congress and the White House are caving in to Big Pharma and Big Insurance's demands. It's time to truly put on the grassroots heat and drown out the special interest voices that have bought every decibal that can be heard! Log onto www.1payer.net for more information on the upcoming National Sickout Day and the Rally at the US Capitol on Thursday, 6/25!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-07-09 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. June 3 Letter
I strongly believe that Americans should have the choice of a public health insurance option operating alongside private plans.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/Letter-from-President-Obama-to-Chairmen-Edward-M-Kennedy-and-Max-Baucus/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-07-09 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Obama WAS in favor of not for profit, single-payer HC for all when
running for the Senate, NOW he is in favor of a public option along with private for profit health insurance.

A public option is not the same as Not For Profit SPHC.

Welcome to DU :)







Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-07-09 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. Excellent points....thank you knr n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-07-09 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
5. Great post, thanks; k&r'd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jakes Progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 01:08 AM
Response to Original message
6. Optimism is a good thing.
I'm glad you feel hopeful, but as you pointed out LBJ had a rough time passing health care for seniors and disabled. And we've never had a president who knew more about controlling and manipulating congress than Lyndon. Perhaps the believers are right, and Obama is savvy and wise beyond his experience. God, I hope so. As far as evidence of it, that hope is about all i've got. So far he seems caught between recalcitrant neocons and personal agenda driven cronies in advisory positions.

He got into office on hope and promises. If he can only deliver one, this is the one the country needs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 05:42 AM
Response to Original message
7. Kicking for the history. People should know. . . . .n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
8. Universal health care--another casualty of the Vietnam War.
Your post makes me realize for the first time how damn close we were to UHC in 1968. LBJ was a wheeler-dealer Senator, up to his eyebrows in crooked Texas politics, but once he got free of the need to keep Dixiecrats happy, he rose far above what he had once been. He had a deadly combination of new-found high purpose and an intimate knowledge of where all the Congressional bodies were buried, so he was incredibly effective at getting his way. We owe civil rights legislation and Medicare to him. If only he hadn't stepped on his dick in Vietnam! His immense ego, his inability to back off, cost us all dearly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
9. kick nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC