Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cheney must end reign of destruction

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-07-09 10:03 PM
Original message
Cheney must end reign of destruction
Cheney must end reign of destruction
By Mark Mansperger, Special to the Herald

...

Let's examine his major claim: The Bush policies, which he undoubtedly had a huge hand in crafting, kept us safe.

...

It is rather amazing that culpability still is somehow evaded. The Bush/Cheney failures actually began in the late 1990s, when they criticized the Clinton administration for the cruise missile strike against al-Qaida in Afghanistan, which obviously was the right thing to do.

Later, when Bush/Cheney assumed office, they seemed to be unaware of the danger terrorism posed, even though the millennium bomber, just to name one threat, recently had been thwarted.

It was abundantly clear that we were being targeted by terrorists, yet there is no evidence of significant attention aimed at the problem.

...

Another attack could just as easily be blowback from what he's done as anything else. Our nation needs to move beyond Dick Cheney.

http://www.tri-cityherald.com/962/story/605784.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tangerine LaBamba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-07-09 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. The best answer -
when the Bush/Cheney defenders say "They kept us safe for seven years," the only reasonable - and accurate - response is "Yeah, but they were in office for eight years."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-07-09 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Or, "No, they were only in office for eight months."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-07-09 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. In the Tricycle Herald?? (aka DryShitties Herald)? Heads are exploding on the Mid-Columbia.
Edited on Sun Jun-07-09 10:24 PM by TahitiNut
:rofl: Doc "The Corrupt Dwarf" Hastings must be pissed.

:rofl:
With his bleak ambiance, frequent sneer and caustic tone, Cheney is akin to some creepy character out of an Ingmar Bergman film. An unabashed exploitation of 9/11 and fear mongering are his standard practice.

Amen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Motown_Johnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-07-09 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
4. Let's ignore his major claim, and just point out that everything he did was illegal
regardless of it's results.

Torture isn't outlawed because it is ineffective, it is outlawed because it is immoral.

Don't play his game. The only response to every thing he says should be "But isn't that against international law and doesn't that make you a war criminal?"


End of story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
metapunditedgy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 01:02 AM
Response to Original message
5. No... Cheney's game is to set himself up as the point man or fall guy, if necessary.
Every time Cheney speaks, ask, what about the other people in the administration who worked to carry out torture policies? How will they be prosecuted? Lots of people need prosecutorial attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
6. kcik
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuliantheApostate Donating Member (32 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
7. Ahh, good ole Dick Cheney...
My favorite Cheney moment had to be declaring that everyone had been mistaken for the past 200 and some odd years, and that the Vice President was not in fact part of the Executive Branch. Instead, he existed in some previously undiscovered middle ground between the Legislative and Executive Branches, which conveniently was not subject to oversight from either one. What a douchebag.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 02:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC