Who the Bell Tolls for in Iraq and Afghanistan

[bigtree]

Words and War

by Norman Solomon
June 8, 2009 02:33 AM

IT takes at least tacit faith in massive violence to believe that after three decades of horrendous violence in Afghanistan, upping the violence there will improve the situation.

Despite the pronouncements from high Washington places that the problems of Afghanistan can't be solved by military means, 90 percent of the spending for Afghanistan in the Obama administration's current supplemental bill is military.

Often it seems that lofty words about war hopes are boilerplate efforts to make us feel better about an endless warfare state. Oratory and punditry laud the Pentagon's fallen as noble victims of war, while enveloping its other victims in a haze of ambiguity or virtual nonexistence.

When last Sunday's edition of the Washington Post printed the routine headline "Iraq War Deaths," the newspaper meant American deaths -- to Washington's ultra-savvy, the deaths that really count. The only numbers and names under the headline were American.

Ask for whom the bell tolls. That's the implicit message -- from top journalists and politicians alike . . .


read more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/norman-solomon/words-and-war_b_212400.html

[kenny blankenship]

1. I don't know about you but I voted last Nov. for war, and plenty of it!

Didn't all good Democrats?

[BeFree]

2. Yeah

That's what we was promised. I 'member that. That and a change in defense spending. A change for more spending, that is.