Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Casino Class: The Looting of America by Les Leopold

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 01:20 PM
Original message
The Casino Class: The Looting of America by Les Leopold

The Casino Class
The Looting of America by Les Leopold. Chelsea Green. Paper, $14.95.
Reviewed by Bill Onasch
kclabor.org
May 28, 2009

If you want to know why it was necessary to give over a trillion dollars to big banks and insurance companies over the last year Les Leopold’s new book is for you. Carrying on the tradition of the Labor Institute he helped found and now directs, Leopold manages to explain the most complex shenanigans of finance capital in language the average worker can understand. To keep us going off the deep end in to despair he sheathes the sharpest edges with some humor. He even closes with some suggestions of what to do.

The reader finds out about derivatives; collateralized debt obligations, including their squared and cubed variations; credit default swaps; and, most inventive of all, synthetic collateralized debt obligations. You’ll also be equipped to impress the counterman on your next trip to the deli by instructing him to tranche your corned beef thin and extra lean. If, like me, you at first find yourself having trouble keeping these byzantine terms straight you can bookmark a handy glossary included by the author in the back.

It wasn’t intended that even mere stock brokers or politicians, much less workers, would ever understand this strange new lexicon, with its underlying definitions of finance. The author quotes former Senator Phil Gramm (of Gramm-Rudman fame) “politicians don’t know a credit default swap from a turnip.” This is the brave new world of “fantasy finance,” exceedingly complicated, not possible before powerful computers started appearing on bank desktops.

But once those PCs arrived, and the old firewall between investment and savings banks was scrapped, thousands of creative hustlers at banks big and small started designing new custom-made over-the-counter securities for customers eager to get more bang for their buck. Leopold explains how early perceived successes in this completely unregulated arena ultimately led to their handling of trillions of dollars–mostly other people’s dollars–like they were playing Fantasy Baseball.

There were a few sticks-in-the-mud who warned early on, even fifteen years ago, the potential for disaster and urged regulation. They were dressed down not only by Greenspan and Bernanke but Obama’s financial gurus as well–Volcker, Rubin, Summers, Geithner. All are free marketeers who likely review a few pages from Milton Friedman before going to bed every night.

If the gambling casinos had been risk takers on a par with the financial casino Las Vegas and Atlantic City would have become ghost towns long ago. With no one–not even the vaunted credit risk evaluators such as Moody’s and Standard & Poors--telling the bankers about their evolving nudity they lost their shirts and got caught with their pants down when the housing bubble burst. Their delicately layered tranches–“insured” by those turnip-like credit default swaps-- forced them to coin yet a new term–toxic asset. The U.S. meltdown also had ramifications throughout the world, even bringing down the government of Iceland.

Suddenly the banks not only had to suspend their fantasy finance; loaded with toxic assets they could no longer carry out their day job of providing basic credit for the day-to-day operations of industry and commerce. Plants and stores started closing. Blue chip companies geared to just-in-time cycles started looking at bankruptcy. That’s what led the free marketeers of both parties to unite around the extraordinary measures of the TARP bailout and even defacto nationalization in some cases.

Leopold writes,

“At least a trillion dollars was handed to big bankers in 2008 and 2009, with very little debate. This is borrowed money that we, the taxpayers and our children, are on the hook for. It’s an immediate transfer of wealth from present and future generations to the largest financial institutions in the world. It may well be the largest wealth transfer since African-Americans built the South. We went along because the financial markets had a gun to our heads. No bailout, no lending. No lending, no economy.”

Nobody tells this story better than Leopold. He also does a great job of explaining the decline of the working class in the USA. The decoupling of productivity and wages, that had moved in tandem through the Fifties and Sixties, mirrored the decline in unionization–especially since Bill Clinton’s NAFTA gave new impetus to offshoring unionism’s manufacturing base.

Unfortunately, the masterful job in looking at the grand scale of class relations and class crisis in the earlier chapters, that left us hungry for the solutions, becomes diluted in to a rather thin soup in the concluding ones. Some regulatory reforms, nationalization of banks, increased minimum wage, passage of labor law reform such as EFCA, are not bad things but hardly seem up to the epic struggle now required. Leopold says,

“…the choice is not between total socialism and unfettered capitalism. Given the vast complexities of our global economic system, we need to make room for more nuanced alternatives.”

I’m not sure what “total” socialism would be. The woman who cuts my wife’s hair in a salon in her home probably doesn’t have to be part of a nationalized planned economy. But there’s no long term future for peaceful coexistence of planned and market economies in any nuanceed setting in my opinion. The meltdown of the financial market might have been ameliorated by regulation but it was still driven by the basic internal laws of capitalist markets.

Merely preventing market catastrophes is not good enough. The market economy--especially with its vast global complexities–will continue to transfer more and more of the wealth we produce to the ruling class. And it is a obstacle that must be removed for the huge job of economic conversion essential to saving our biosphere from destruction by global warming. Only a democratically planned economy can handle that urgent task.

But answers to these questions are more than we have a right to expect from one book–or one book review. All in all, Les Leopold has done a commendable job with the Looting of America. Every worker trying to sort out the mess we find ourselves in should read it.

http://www.kclabor.org/casino_class.htm


Copyright Issues. The original content we provide is now copyrighted and may not be reproduced by commercial media without our consent. However, labor movement and other nonprofit media may reproduce with attribution.

http://www.kclabor.org/good.htm


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's not a casino if the "odds" are "fixed."
Edited on Mon Jun-08-09 01:23 PM by RUMMYisFROSTED
:think:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. On the contrary - it's not a casino if the odds AREN'T fixed - in favor of the house, of course . .
Oh, and you can't have any clocks, either - only celebrity infotainment & sports on the Giganto-Trons in every room . . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-09-09 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Note the ""
I understand the vig.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. He's right but the argument that the Grand kids are going to be paying is false.
Edited on Mon Jun-08-09 01:30 PM by Skink
there is enough capital in this country to get through this. Hell wall street could pay it back in the form of windfall profits taxes. Or we could raise taxes on everybody. Clinton did. Reagan did it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yep. It's political cowardice that is stopping it.
Conservatives have been very successful at making the people tax-averse but too bad, we're not going to get out of this situation for free.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
4. ttt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aldo Donating Member (297 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
6. Obama's economic gurus are like landlords who milk a building, i.e. make no repairs but collect the
rent, until the building falls down. We're being 3rd World-ized. The American way of life is built on a widespread middle class. Obama is failing us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nichomachus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
7. But there were other factors underlying all that
Edited on Mon Jun-08-09 03:07 PM by nichomachus
All of these phony securities wouldn't have been sold had there not been money in search of investment.

When productivity became detached from workers' wages back in the '70s, the trouble began. It used to be that higher productivity meant higher wages. This is what created the middle class. Workers would produce more and get more money. The workers would spend and that would pump the economy by creating demand for new goods. But that ended. Since the '70s, productivity has increased and workers' wages have stayed flat -- or declined.

This meant that the extra money was floating to the top. Money is always in search of investments. At the same time, the country began its love affair with eliminating taxes on the rich. That meant even more money floated to the top, also in search of investments. But, there are only so many solid investments available.

This accounts for a lot of real estate froth -- and the Internet bubble, when people were investing millions of dollars in crap. That ended.

The banks weren't stupid. They saw that there was all this money looking for somewhere to go. So, they started creating these phony "securities." They couldn't afford to have any regulation because if anyone with more than a sixth grade education really figured out what they were doing, they would have stopped them.

Trickle-down economics is right -- in theory. It doesn't work so well in practice. Theoretically, people at the top who get more money will invest it, but they won't necessarily put it back into the business or start a new business. They will chase the best return. And the best returns were coming from these phony "securities." So, that's where all the money went -- and this is why the manufacturing sector, along with everything else started to go to hell. Who is going to put their money into a machine tool plant and take a chance of getting 4 percent, when they can go into derivatives and get 10, 15, or 20 percent?

So, it was the labor policies that began in the '70s, along with the no-tax crowd that really set the stage for the current problem.

At the same time, we saw the WalMartization of America, where WalMart offered cheap goods to people whose incomes weren't keeping up with productivity. Of course, WalMart kept its prices low by demanding its suppliers produce more and pay workers less -- and eventually putting most of its American suppliers out of business.

Then, in order to keep consumption high, we hooked consumers on debt -- something that really didn't exist in the late 1960s or early '70s.

There is no single cause of the current mess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. You should run for something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nichomachus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-08-09 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Right now, I'm running for the border
I didn't come up with this on my own -- I read a lot. The situation is pretty scary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 01:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC