Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

More needless deaths in the war on drugs: Govt-suppressed evidence that cannabis kills cancer cells

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Fly by night Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-12-09 07:04 AM
Original message
More needless deaths in the war on drugs: Govt-suppressed evidence that cannabis kills cancer cells
Preface: I am posting (in its entirety) this recent NORML research summary on the chemotherapeutic effects of cannabinoids for a host of cancer cell lines. If you want to review the fifteen medical research references that document this research summary, please visit this link: http://www.norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=6814

The following research summary demonstrates that there are a host of additional needless victims of the war on (some) drugs besides the 800,000+ people who are arrested for cannabis use each year in this country. Those are cancer patients who are diagnosed with one of the half-dozen or so cancer cell lines for which we have known (since the mid 70s) that cannabinoids function as an effective chemotherapeutic agent. That research (some of which was conducted while I was at the National Cancer Institute in the mid-70s) has been buried for four decades by our federal drug-worriers, an act of intellectual suppression that boggles the mind (and saddens the soul).

One of my cousins, who died in his late 20s from glioma, wanted to get into one of the clinical trials in Italy or Spain that have helped demonstrate the powerful tumor-shrinking effects of cannabinoids for his brain cancer. Unfortunately, that was not possible and similar clinical trials are still prohibited in all US medical schools.

Damn the entrenched drug-worriers. Damn them all.

FBN
Federal Bureau of Prisons # 16502-075
www.saveberniesfarm.com
----

Cannabinoids As Cancer Hope

by Paul Armentano
Senior Policy Analyst
NORML | NORML Foundation

“Cannabinoids possess … anticancer activity (and may) possibly represent a new class of anti-cancer drugs that retard cancer growth, inhibit angiogenesis (the formation of new blood vessels) and the metastatic spreading of cancer cells." So concludes a comprehensive review published in the October 2005 issue of the scientific journal Mini-Reviews in Medicinal Chemistry.

Not familiar with the emerging body of research touting cannabis' ability to stave the spread of certain types of cancers? You're not alone.

For over 30 years, US politicians and bureaucrats have systematically turned a blind eye to scientific research indicating that marijuana may play a role in cancer prevention -- a finding that was first documented in 1974. That year, a research team at the Medical College of Virginia (acting at the behest of the federal government) discovered that cannabis inhibited malignant tumor cell growth in culture and in mice. According to the study's results, reported nationally in an Aug. 18, 1974, Washington Post newspaper feature, administration of marijuana's primary cannabinoid THC, "slowed the growth of lung cancers, breast cancers and a virus-induced leukemia in laboratory mice, and prolonged their lives by as much as 36 percent."

Despite these favorable preclinical findings, US government officials dismissed the study (which was eventually published in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute in 1975), and refused to fund any follow-up research until conducting a similar –- though secret –- clinical trial in the mid-1990s. That study, conducted by the US National Toxicology Program to the tune of $2 million concluded that mice and rats administered high doses of THC over long periods experienced greater protection against malignant tumors than untreated controls.

Rather than publicize their findings, government researchers once again shelved the results, which only came to light after a draft copy of its findings were leaked in 1997 to a medical journal, which in turn forwarded the story to the national media.

Nevertheless, in the decade since the completion of the National Toxicology trial, the U.S. government has yet to encourage or fund additional, follow up studies examining the cannabinoids' potential to protect against the spread cancerous tumors.

Fortunately, scientists overseas have generously picked up where US researchers so abruptly left off. In 1998, a research team at Madrid's Complutense University discovered that THC can selectively induce apoptosis (program cell death) in brain tumor cells without negatively impacting the surrounding healthy cells. Then in 2000, they reported in the journal Nature Medicine that injections of synthetic THC eradicated malignant gliomas (brain tumors) in one-third of treated rats, and prolonged life in another third by six weeks.

In 2003, researchers at the University of Milan in Naples, Italy, reported that non-psychoactive compounds in marijuana inhibited the growth of glioma cells in a dose dependent manner and selectively targeted and killed malignant cancer cells.

The following year, researchers reported in the journal of the American Association for Cancer Research that marijuana's constituents inhibited the spread of brain cancer in human tumor biopsies. In a related development, a research team from the University of South Florida further noted that THC can also selectively inhibit the activation and replication of gamma herpes viruses. The viruses, which can lie dormant for years within white blood cells before becoming active and spreading to other cells, are thought to increase one's chances of developing cancers such as Karposi's Sarcoma, Burkitts lymphoma, and Hodgkins disease.

More recently, investigators published pre-clinical findings demonstrating that cannabinoids may play a role in inhibiting cell growth of colectoral cancer, skin carcinoma, breast cancer, and prostate cancer, among other conditions. When investigators compared the efficacy of natural cannabinoids to that of a synthetic agonist, THC proved far more beneficial – selectively decreasing the proliferation of malignant cells and inducing apoptosis more rapidly than its synthetic alternative while simultaneously leaving healthy cells unscathed.

Nevertheless, US politicians have been little swayed by these results, and remain steadfastly opposed to the notion of sponsoring – or even acknowledging – this growing body clinical research, preferring instead to promote the unfounded notion that cannabis use causes cancer. Until this bias changes, expect the bulk of research investigating the use of cannabinoids as anticancer agents to remain overseas and, regrettably, overlooked in the public discourse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mnemosyne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-12-09 07:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. If only it was legal my mom wouldn't be suffering so horribly now. She was diagnosed
2 weeks ago with extensive bone cancer, metastasized either from her previous bout with rare breast cancers in 2005 or from melanoma in 2008.

Entire skull, scapula, sternum, ribs, hips, femurs and spine are involved. It is horrible to see her in such pain knowing a few tokes would help ease it, at least somewhat.

I hate the bastards.

I am so glad that my 'activity' over the last 38 years may possibly help spare me. I am a DES daughter.

Thanks for the info, Bernie! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-12-09 07:49 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. When someone is that sick
Edited on Fri Jun-12-09 07:50 AM by slay
fuck it - who cares if it's legal - get it anyways. Can bake it in some brownies if don't like the smoke. I have a friend who has AIDS and that's what she does. It's not legal here, but she has AIDS, and I know from watching her lose so much weight before the marijuana that she would be dead without it. it's an absolute CRIME to keep marijuana illegal and away from sick people. :grr:

*edited for clarity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fly by night Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-12-09 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Agree completely. Here's a letter (sent to my judge) by an MD whose patient received mmj from me.
Actually, this is just a portion of the letter:

"My patient was diagnosed with metastatic renal cancer.... At diagnosis, it was in both kidneys, her liver, lungs and spine. The drug that gave her the most relief was marijuana. More than a cocktail of morphine, zofran, phernegan and ativan/xanax. It was the only thing which relieved that unremitting nausea, the only thing that allowed her real respite.

"(When) she died, she was so thin I could have carried her to the hearse alone."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-12-09 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Yes - it was a benefit to my mom with pancreatic cancer
The medical marijuana buds were crumbled into hemp milk and slowly "cooked" using a low heat, then added to her green tea. Very effective anti-nausea after chemo and tasty too. She couldn't eat much but she could drink that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-12-09 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. I'd never heard of it being consumed that way
but that's very cool that it helped. I can see that since the THC is soluble in butter makes since it would work with milk too. Once something becomes illegal - like marijuana - it is sooooo hard to get it legal again - even though most people agree it should be - at the very least for medical. grrr.. argh..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fly by night Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-13-09 05:02 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. Cannabis can also be used as a tincture and as an oral spray.
If it is eaten or made into a beverage, it must be made with some oil or fat (like milk or butter) or alcohol to release the bioactive ingredients. Just pouring boiling water over it won't do the trick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Contrary1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-13-09 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
18. Amen to that!
When I was beginning chemo, a good friend gifted me with enough to get me through the ordeal. I only used it once for the nausea, but it was comforting to know it was there if I needed it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dem Nation Donating Member (2 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-13-09 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
20. Cannabis was the only thing that helped my mom in her last days.
My heart goes out to you and your mother. We must all speak up and advocate for those who are not well enough to do so. I have written my mom's story here:
http://my.nowpublic.com/health/how-i-became-medical-cannabis-activist-blame-mom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-12-09 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
4. But we must think of the children..
If any Tom, Dick or Harry can get pot just by having cancer, then what of their children that might sneak a toke from dad's supply and end up hooked for life.

We need to send a message and that message is one of zero tolerance for the demon weed.

And yes, it's :sarcasm: for the terminally impaired.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fly by night Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-12-09 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. My father died of cancer. I would have loved to have him around longer through the gift of mmj.
So when I "think of the children", that's my thought.

Thanks for keeping this thread kicked. Sarcasm or no, this medical research scandal needs to be exposed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-12-09 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
7. The lack of honesty by government in dealing with all related issues is appalling.
From the causes of cancer, to the prevention of cancer, to the utility of it for medicinal purposes, to the alleged "damage" it does to persons, the whole thing is a gigantic scam by government against this one item in the world.

Alcohol, tobacco, and prescription drugs are the real problems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fly by night Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-12-09 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Agreed. As is the tendancy to "refine" and "purify" substances that were just fine to begin with.
The continued effort to push Marinol (a synthetic THC) as an alternative to whole-plant cannabis, even though it has consistently been shown to be more expensive, less efficacious and more dysphoric (for naive users) than whole-plant cannabis, is a prime example.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BolivarianHero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-12-09 10:18 AM
Original message
Cancer too?...
I know I won't have to worry about Alzheimer's in 40 years because of the role THC plays in preventing its onset, but knowing this is a big nonus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fly by night Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-12-09 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
9. What's a "nonus"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backtoblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-12-09 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
8. K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wan Donating Member (18 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-12-09 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
10. Heavy marijuana use not linked to lung cancer
www.news-medical.net/news/2006/05/24/18122.aspx
<quote>
24. May 2006 16:09
Despite popular belief, a new study shows that people who smoke marijuana do not appear to be at increased risk of developing lung cancer.
It seems even heavy, long-term marijuana users do not appear to increase the risk of head and neck cancers, such as cancer of the tongue, mouth, throat, or esophagus.

Senior researcher, Donald Tashkin, M.D., Professor of Medicine at the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA in Los Angeles says the findings were a surprise as they expected to find that a history of heavy marijuana use would increase the risk of cancer from several years to decades after exposure to marijuana.
...</quote>

I smoked a lot when I was younger, yet the only two addictions I ever developed was for cigarettes and mountain dew. Of these two mountain dew is the difficult as it acts like a physical addiction. Funny thing is coffee or other sodas don't help for some reason that makes me curious. I'm considering going back to smoking some marijuana to alleviate some.. issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-12-09 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Great post wan
Even though it doesn't cause lung cancer, I can speak from first-hand experience that it does "take a toll" on one's lungs as you get older - and the more you smoke. I'm in my 30's now, been smokin mj since I was around 15 and in the last few years I find that my lungs don't feel as good for days after smoking. Luckily there are some alternatives to straight up smoking like vaporizers as well as making pot butter and baking it in food. I recommend one of those two way if you take up the herb again - however, smokin a bowl or what now sure isn't gonna kill ya. :evilgrin: :smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wan Donating Member (18 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-13-09 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. True, There are several consequences...
Respiratory distress is the most serious. Also there is demotivational syndrome, which is more serious for youth. In spite of my personal experiences, I have met people who were in fact addicted. This judgment is not based on just liking it and smoking it every day, I did that at one point, but difficulty in maintaining productivity through the day without it. If this was grounds for outlawing it mountain dew would also qualify for scheduling under drug laws. The vast majority of so called effects of smoking marijuana are better explained as reasons that group smoked it in the first place, rather than an effect of it. Use by youth certainly should be regulated like alcohol.

Respiratory distress, demotivational syndrome, and addiction aside, people who smoke marijuana tend to outlive people who don't, all else being equal. This is generally explained by reduced stress and anxiety, but there may likly be even more to it than that. A large reduction of stress and anxiety is certainly capable of the life expectancy results.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wednesdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-12-09 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
14. K&R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wan Donating Member (18 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-13-09 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Medical Marijuana: Unpublished Federal Study Found THC- Treated Rats Lived Longer, Had Less Cancer
I did some searching to back up my last response to slay. I didn't find the old studies I reviewed when I was youger, but I found this:
http://www.aids.org/atn/a-263-04.html">Medical Marijuana: Unpublished Federal Study Found THC- Treated Rats Lived Longer, Had Less Cancer
The reduced incidence of cancers backs up my assumption that life expectancy increases was more than just a stress reduction effect.

Even a basic google search, limited to reputable sources, shows that there is no public health argument against marijuana. Negetive effects naturally. People kill themselves with aspirin ever year, and even vitamines kill people on occassion. Marijuana is far safer than almost everything in your home, including much of the food you eat, and for all practical purposes it's impossible to kill anybody with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-13-09 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
19. Kick
Thanks for this thread, Fly by Night
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 04:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC