I wish a mixed private/public plan could provide good care affordably for all, and not create more economic pain.
If the first line of defense for rising costs is cuts in care and/or subsidies as in the currently proposed plan, and not insurance profits and administrative expenses, coverage and/or quality of care will inevitably suffer. That kills people. Just ask the nurses.
Virtually all of the reforms being floated by President Obama and other centrist Democrats have been tried, and have failed repeatedly. Plans that combined mandates to purchase coverage with Medicaid expansions fell apart in Massachusetts (1988), Oregon (1992), and Washington state (1993); the latest iteration (Massachusetts, 2006) is already stumbling, with uninsurance again rising and costs soaring. Tennessee’s experiment with a massive Medicaid expansion and a public plan option worked - for one year, until rising costs sank it.
and
Enacting phony “universal coverage” has not brought any state closer to a single-payer system. Since the early 1990s, Minnesota, Oregon, Maine, Florida, Utah, Washington, California, Vermont and Massachusetts have been among the states that have attempted to “patch-up” their fundamentally fl awed systems while retaining a place for insurance companies. All have failed. Upon passage, incremental reforms in each of these states were hailed by politicians and the media as a “step toward universal coverage.” Yet despite all the claims of pragmatism, incremental reformers have been unable to shepherd through meaningful change in nearly four decades of trying. And while reformers in these states continue to wait for the next “step,” residents continue to suffer.
http://www.pnhp.org/news/2009/june/hold_out_for_single_.phpSee also the human consequences of supporting a plan that includes the spiraling costs of the many for-profit insurers:Because the U.S. going deeper into debt is certainly not painless. It's already costing me plenty in significantly reduced value of my IRA and pension and every essential purchase I make from food to utilities to transportation as the dollar loses value because of the U.S.'s excessive borrowing. It's costing me in additional state fees and property taxes as the state and local gov'ts have to try to make up for federal cutbacks and the inflation-fueled increase in costs for everything they use to provide essential services. Obama and friends think you can just keep printing money, not hold anyone to account in order to reduce theft, fraud, and excessive profit-taking and there will be no consequences. There already are painful consequences, especially to Baby Boomers who paid a lifetime in taxes and Soc. Sec. and find themselves unemployed and unemployable as businesses prefer to hire young people living in their parents' homes instead of 50-somethings. This economy is crashing down around our ears, with our few remaining large industries closing, and our gov't unwilling or unable to stimulate new industry as they promised instead of using our total revenue plus borrowing power each year to donate to banks and now to health insurance cos., and to service the debt on that expenditure. Debt in service of measures that truly revitalize the economy can protect quality of life and eventually pay for itself. What is happening now is just plain punishing for most people.
By not standing firm for single payer, we will also be abandoning hope for the economic stimulus of a plan that frees businesses, large and small, from crushing costs of insuring employees, the same costs that hastened the shut down of most of Chrysler and the bankruptcy of GM.
Americans need desperately to base our support of a measure on experience, if available, as the best kind of info, rather than repeating failures in hopes that the consequences will be different.