My local state Rep, Republican of course, wrote the following "Guest Editorial" in my local, small town, weekly paper. My LTTE follows.
Keeping you in charge of your health care
GUEST EDITORIAL
by Rep. Matthew Baker
Published: Thursday, June 11, 2009 10:01 AM CDT
With the cost of health care skyrocketing, we are facing a crisis. Fortunately, in Pennsylvania, 92 percent of our residents are insured. Yet, there are still too many people who are uninsured, particularly in this economy where employees are losing their jobs and, in turn, losing their health insurance.
We need to enact measures that will help to lower health care costs and improve access to care for the uninsured and underinsured. However, any reform must maintain the doctor-patient relationship and help to provide coverage for those who cannot afford it.
I believe every Pennsylvanian should have access to quality, affordable health care. To accomplish this, we need a balanced, common sense approach. What we cannot have is a government-run system that takes away your right to decide your health care treatment.
There are two competing ideas regarding health care reform in Pennsylvania and Washington. The Democrat plan seeks to ration health care and put government in control, instead of you and your doctor. The Republican plan helps to lower the cost of care for all Pennsylvanians, increase access and keeps you in charge of your health care decisions.
http://www.tiogapublishing.com/articles/2009/06/11/opinion/doc4a3117c7948f2732381854.txt Here was my response:
I am writing in regard to Representative Baker's guest editorial in the June 10th Gazette. In this editorial, Representative Baker makes much about "keeping you in charge of your health care," and not having a "government run system that takes away your right to decide your health care treatment." Since Representative Baker is a politician and does not have to worry about finding, keeping, and paying for insurance, I find it ironic that he wants to lower costs for ALL Pennsylvanians while helping to cover MORE of the uninsured. How many is more? Who deserves not to be covered?
We already have organizations that determine your medical decisions, from which doctors you can see to what procedures will be provided for you. They are called insurance companies. Provided you are fortunate enough to have health insurance, these companies can deny you treatment, not let you see the doctor you choose, and drop your coverage when you become a liability to their bottom line.
Access to health insurance is not the answer, access to health care for all is! For a politician to have any credibility regarding denying anyone access to quality, free health care, said politician needs to drop their government run health insurance and take their chances on the open market. Let us know how you make out.