Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sad Obit for Farah (she deserves better)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
cagesoulman Donating Member (648 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-25-09 06:08 PM
Original message
Sad Obit for Farah (she deserves better)
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/26/arts/television/26appraisal.html?hp

The Burning Bed alone should garner Farrah some respect, but the heather writing the NYT obit (Alessandra Stanley) is just annoying.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-25-09 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. Some heather wrote for the LA Times...
...Farrah could act...people don't realize that just to appear natural on camera is acting and a helluva lotta people can't do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cagesoulman Donating Member (648 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-25-09 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. The LA Times actually had some good quotes; The NYTimes is just bitchy

"Robert Duvall cast Fawcett as his wife in his 1997 independent film "The Apostle," about a Texas Pentecostal preacher who escapes to Louisiana after accidentally killing his wife's lover. Again, she won praise.

"That woman's work has been very underrated," Duvall told Texas Monthly, citing her Emmy-nominated performance in "Small Sacrifices," a 1989 TV movie in which her character kills her children. "That woman knows how to act."

http://www.latimes.com/news/obituaries/la-me-farrah-fawcett26-2009jun26,0,4388762.story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-25-09 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. That's not an obituary, it's an article in the Arts section
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cagesoulman Donating Member (648 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-25-09 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. It's on the front page of the NYTimes.com
And it is, functionally, an obituary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-25-09 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Here's her NY Times obituary:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/26/arts/television/26fawcett.html

Goddamn, some people need to calm down.

What you posted is titled "An Appraisal".

Fuck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cagesoulman Donating Member (648 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-25-09 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. You had to search for the "official obit". The "appraisal" is gonna get more traffic and
the chiquita wrote it is a heather. Nasty piece of trash. Appraisal my ass.

And I'll see your "Fuck" and raise you a "Fuckin' A"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-25-09 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. I don't care what gets more traffic; truth is, what you posted is not the obituary,
even though offered it as such and, seemingly, continue to want people to believe that it is.

Also, there's no rule in the book - even though a lot of jackasses here will tell you so - there's no rule in the book that says you can't be critical of someone who's dead.

It's just fucking childish to think otherwise.

The appraisal piece is just that - an appraisal. Warts and all. Just like a movie review can be both praising and damning. Otherwise it would be called "propaganda", and we are not supposed to like propaganda. I know I hate it like all fuck-out. I prefer to dwell in the world of truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cagesoulman Donating Member (648 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-25-09 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. It's the first thing you see. The LA times had their obit on the front page
The NY Times knows this. Why that heather felt the need to add her fucking two cents on top of the official obit and why the Times thought her two cents was worth front page space is beyond me.

Critical is one thing. Being a bitchy heather is another.


An "appraisal piece" (WTF?) is a personal opinion, not really an objective appraisal. So don't go on and on about "appraisal" like it means something in the NYTimes. It doesn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dappleganger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-25-09 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. That's disgusting
If she were in my family I'd be furious!

When my mother passed away last August we agreed that I was to write the obituary and control all the writing about her. Am so glad that happened that way. The funeral home tried to change one sentence and I called them up and read them the riot act.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cagesoulman Donating Member (648 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-25-09 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I thought so.
You'd think Alessandra never saw The Burning Bed or any of Farrah's later work. Or maybe she just has something against the poor woman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-25-09 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
6. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-25-09 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC