Bush supporters are either lying assholes or morons

[BlueStater]

Either the cartoonist (Mike Lester) is so uniformed that he doesn't realize that three GOP congressmen visited Syria just a week ago or he's purposely deceiving his readers into believing Bush's bullshit.

And here he has Uncle Sam, a symbol of America, smaking his forehead. You and Bush can speak for yourselves, you pair of douchebags. You certainly don't represent the rest of the country.

[Little Wing]

1. Agreed. Either way, they're holding a great nation back in the stoneage.

[Rex]

2. Both. Lying, asshole morans.

See FreeRepublic for details. Google it.

[Monkeyman]

4. Yep

[Union Label]

10. No thanks

I went to that place once and what I could find was vile shit. It looks like a three year old designed that shithole, you can't navigate in there worth a shit.

[Rex]

12. I love playing with their fragile little minds.

It, er they amuse me.

[dogday]

3. Uh, I think they are both nt

[jaysunb]

5. Both

:evilfrown:

[Democrats_win]

6. They could draw the same cartoon after she meets with Terror-supporter Bush.

There's been news reports of buscho supporting terrorists in Lebanon and Iran.

[Double T]

7. lying assholes, complete morons and totally brainwashed.

fox news and lush limpballs drill and drum the same message to their minion listeners hour after hour, day after day

[cassiepriam]

8. I can't decide either if they are just plain stupid or crooks.

Hard to tell.

[lefador]

13. You don't have to decide....

... they are pretty stupid crooks. Those are not necessarily mutually exclusive, you know?

The average republican is a moron, why? Because the republican party pretty much caters to the interests of 5 to 10% of the population tops, which means that a majority of republican voters are actually voting against their own interests, which could mean that as many as 3 out of 4 voting republicans are actually pro-actively against their own interests.

Which to me it is pretty moronic: some republicans have to work 3 jobs to make ends meet so that the rich people -which they are not- get their tax breaks, all while their social coverage gets reduced, and while they send their kids to die in a war where the rich republicans won't have their own offspring with a 2000 mile long pole. So yes these people are dumb as rocks, and of course can you point me at a single week in the past six years in which there hasn't been an scandal involving a republican politician? So the case can also be made that a lot of these republican voters do support such corruption, since themselves are crooks.

I am willing to bet that some of these die hard Bush supporters are worse off now, than they ever were with Clinton. But they don't want to even entertain the notion that they voted a complete moron into the highest office in the land, because that would point out about the possibility of mental retardation on their part. So they rather create an alternative reality in which the fault of everything is actually due to the party which is not in power to begin with. If you look at it from a distribution point of view, the 20% of Bush supporters could be very well be a representation of the left end of a bell curve expressing the IQ of the population with a low to high ordering on the x-axis.

This is a lot of these moronic Bush supporters don't know better than to realize that not only are they being the whores, but they are providing the bed and paying their Johns (aka the republican elite) to screw them. Which means a lot of these idiots don't even have the skills to become prostitutes.

See only a group of people who were dumb as rocks would consider a good thing to take a nation with unprecedented economic growth, hoisted by 8 years of relative peace and clear prosperity that lead to a massive surplus, and turn it into an economy that has gone through at least a recession, massive deficits, with increasing economic inequalities all under the frame of a constant war-like state.

[Ian David]

9. ABC News Exclusive: The Secret War Against Iran

A Pakistani tribal militant group responsible for a series of deadly guerrilla raids inside Iran has been secretly encouraged and advised by American officials since 2005, U.S. and Pakistani intelligence sources tell ABC News.

The group, called Jundullah, is made up of members of the Baluchi tribe and operates out of the Baluchistan province in Pakistan, just across the border from Iran.

It has taken responsibility for the deaths and kidnappings of more than a dozen Iranian soldiers and officials.

U.S. officials say the U.S. relationship with Jundullah is arranged so that the U.S. provides no funding to the group, which would require an official presidential order or "finding" as well as congressional oversight.

Tribal sources tell ABC News that money for Jundullah is funneled to its youthful leader, Abd el Malik Regi, through Iranian exiles who have connections with European and Gulf states.

More:
http://blogs.abcnews.com/theblotter/2007/04/abc_news_exclus.html

[lefador]

14. So let me get this straight....

...if any country harbors/supports terrorist who may attack us, then they are evil and will be bombed back to the stone age.

However, the US can harbor/support terrorist as long as they attack other countries. Because we all know how well some previous CIA protegees, *caugh* Bin Laden *caugh*, turned out! I mean, when do we get people imprisoned for treason in this country, jeebus!


So I think the US needs to re-brand the "War on terror" as "War on terror*"


*some restrictions apply, terror may be a relative term, terror maybe OK if used by the US.

[Dune]

11. evil

They are both... as well as scared little rats in a world of mirrors.

[ComerPerro]

15. its one of the two, maybe both.