Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WTF is an "Islamist"?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 08:07 PM
Original message
WTF is an "Islamist"?
I've noticed terms such as "Islamist" and "Islamist extremist" have seeped into the lexicon and i've also noticed they are used primarily by right-wing hater types. Surely, this is not incidental. Where did these terms come from and what's the point? Any clues?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's a label Americans pin on any Muslim who needs to be murdered
for geopolitical reasons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SayWhatYo Donating Member (991 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. It seems to be a real word...
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/Islamist

Can't say I ever gave much thought about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dairydog91 Donating Member (520 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. Essentially...
An Islamist is an Islamic fundie who wants to implement Islamic law, enforce Islamic cultural standards, and create an Islam-based government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElizabethDC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. Pretty much
Islamism is a political movement to bring Islam into government and politics (an Islamist, of course, is then one who believes that government should be guided by Islam.)

Islamist is a legitimate scholarly term. As a matter of fact, I'm currently reading a book called "Islamist Mobilization in Turkey," which I was assigned to read for a comparative politics class.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Malikshah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. Actually, it's a hell of a lot less offensive than "jihadi"
Islamist is used, I've noticed, when discussing those who wish to have Islam reasserted as a guiding force in societies where it once was-- Movements in Turkey from the 1960s on...Hasan al-Banna and the pre-1950s Muslim Brotherhood, etc.

Adding extremist to the term means something different.

So too would adding such terms as Militant or radical

Unfortunately, those right-wing wackos and those thinking like them, like to lump folks together.

Someone calling for the reassertion of Islam as a guiding force within society is different than those who wish to do so via violence, or to convert by force, etc.

Jihadi on the other hand is both grammtically and intellectually offensive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Right; it seems to have that political component added; probably parallel to "Zionist"
At least that's how I've interpreted it.

We've seen how traditional religious identity has been used politically to draw people together and remind them of a shared past and possible future -- Lech Walesa did this in Poland by drawing on a specifically Polish version of Roman Catholicism that includes the Virgin of Chestohova. So it can be used benignly and still be quite powerful.

I've been interpreting "Islamist" as describing Muslims who are struggling for a national identity in context of their traditional homelands, sometimes but not always in violent ways.

Hekate

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. "Jihadi" might be gramatically and intellectually offensive,
but it's used in the liberal English-language press in countries that enshrine Islam in their constitutions. Millions of Muslims have no problem with it, esp. used as an adjective.

Seems fine in constructions such as "jihadi movements" or "jihadi parties", a normal nisba adjective derived from a noun. It's a bit off-hand to substantivize the adjective, but we do it any way, maybe because English doesn't do templatic morphology like Arabic, but we do understand adding a suffix.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Malikshah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-12-07 08:03 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. liberal English-language press? What does have to do with the issue
other than to create a debate about liberal or non-liberal

Enshrine Islam in their constitutions?

Oooookay...

Would love to have the poll numbers on the millions of Muslims.

As "jihadi" is relatively new...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
5. It's a word made up by people...
who don't realize that a practitioner of Islam is called a "muslim."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
6. Don't forget "Islamofascist" (for advanced freepers only, I hear.)
The right has tried to play these words into the national vocablulary, all the while using the words in such ways as to conjour feelings of fear and hate amongst those listening.

This is how you learn to hate a people, a culture.

Can't be the bestest country in the world, ever, without a big, bad boogey man to rally against.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingshakabobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Kind of like "Papist." No? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Which is a true oxymoron
Islamic fundamentalists have no belief in a corporate/dictatorial alliance to solve their problems.

Nobody WANTS fascism. It's always IMPOSED on a culture, either through fear or overwhelming outside influences.

Indeed, that's why radical Islam has gained such a foothold in the ME.

It's an attempt to define themselves by what they identify with the most. Their religion.

It's the one thing that they have in common and the West doesn't like it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wiley50 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
9. When You live on an Island
at times the atmosphere gets very humid

Sometimes it gets so humid it almost rains
But not quite

What happens in these times is called an

Isla-mist
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. "Is la mist" my franco-american relatives might say.
"I-slam-ist" for an angry kid slamming the door?
"Ia lamest" misspelled for what Mrbush does?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
12. I dunno, but we should start calling Pukers - Islamest Morans.
Edited on Wed Apr-11-07 09:03 PM by Rex
They still don't know what Moran means. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
15. It makes a useful distinction. That's what words are for.
Some take exception with words and are offended by them because they are niggardly with their understanding and good will. For example.

"Islamists" is equivalent to "Muslims" with a few modifiers. People like ignoring "with a few modifiers" because they are prickly and want to be offended. They should learn to be tolerant and seek understanding instead of insult.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC